Anthony Debono’s defence claims ‘private’ works fell within CMU’s remit
Prosecution says Gozo ministry's projects director had complained to minister Giovanna Debono over works husband was commissioning, for which he could not executive payment
The defence counsel for Anthony Debono, 59, tore into the evidence presented by the prosecution, saying the allegedly ‘private’ works that Debono commissioned using public funds under his authority as head of the Gozo ministry’s construction and maintenance unit (CMU), were in fact public works.
In the third sitting of the compilation of evidence against Debono, husband of former Gozo minister Giovanna Debono, defence lawyer Joe Giglio listed all the works presented by the prosecution, submitting that each of them were public works, and not private commissions carried out abusively using public funds.
Debono is accused of having misappropriated over €5,000 in public funds by virtue of his employment; of having profited to the tune of over €5,000 from public monies and private contractors; used his official capacity as a civil servant to his own private advantage, in dereliction of his public duty; rendered himself an accomplice in the falsification of public documents for the issuing of payments and goods; and abused of his public role and of public acts entrusted to him.
Giglio challenged prosecuting inspector Ian Abdilla over the outright majority of some 22 works that whistleblower Joseph Cauchi alleges were privately-commissioned works carried out on the ministerial budget.
Cauchi, a contractor who now enjoys protection under the Whistleblower Act, is to testify in the compilation of evidence against Debono next week.
Cauchi has told police investigators that Debono would pay him for private works under a system of false invoicing so that private works could be financed by the ministerial budget.
But in showing that each of the works were in some way or another, repairs or maintenance of public amenities or farm access roads, Giglio argued that this work fell squarely within the CMU’s remit.
At times the prosecution was unable to answer whether works they insisted were privately commissioned, could have been “spillovers” from public works: in one case, a farm access road that finished “just 10 centimetres” beyond a private gate, Giglio said.
Giglio ran through each individual contract listed as evidence, to ask Inspector Ian Abdilla on what ground had the police surmised that works such as those for Gharb FC’s football ground, had been considered “privately commissioned”.
The line of questioning turned out to be uncomfortable for Abdilla, who as Giglio was about to repeat all throughout the sitting, had to answer how public works requested by a local council, voluntary organisations, for public safety reasons, or for farm access roads could be considered illicit.
Giglio said that it was well within the CMU’s remit, as he quoted from the Gozo ministry’s annual report, that it could carry out repairs and maintenance on government-owned properties.
Abdilla tried rebutting Cauchi’s line of questioning, saying that many works were not carried out according to public tender.
But here Giglio would point out that Debono, a civil servant, was not being called to answer to the Public Service Commission or the Internal Audit and Investigation Department. “These are financial breaches you mention here… not the charges of fraud you have accused my client of.”
Giglio cruised through almost each of the individual works, pointing out why they could not be considered ‘private’ works.
He said a basement excavated for Brookies restaurant, allegedly a wine cellar according to Abdilla, had been necessary for works related to the flooding in the area.
In one case of a surfaced countryside lane, Insp. Abdilla insisted that the road passing through the country lead directly to a private residence and over private property. But Giglio said that the CMU’s role was to provide farm access roads. Another job submitted as evidence was the widening of a bridge at Lunzjata valley, which was government-owned property. The works were allegedly done at the behest of a private person, who has since then passed away.
Another private job in a residence was said to have been part of road alignment works.
A Fontana road surfaced by Cauchi allegedly on instruction by Debono, was claimed by Giglio to have been created to divert rainfall away from farmers’ fields. Abdilla said that there was no documentation substantiating Giglio’s claims, and that the road did not appear to serve as a diversion for flooding.
In another case, Giglio insisted that works by the CMU connecting a house’s sewage to the government mains was a public works job, but Abdilla countered that private residences could not expect the CMU to pay for their drainage pipes to be connected to the public system
“I never accused Debono of having carried out private works,” Insp. Abdilla said. “I presented a conclusive list of accusations by Cauchi, as a whistleblower, which I investigated, and which I have presented in its entirety to the court. I never specifically referred to any works being carried out either publicly or privately.”
Giglio also said that works Cauchi carried out for €13,000, allegedly at the behest of Anthony Debono for quarry owner Sammy Camilleri, had been settled by Camilleri himself.
Various were the examples in which Giglio pushed the line that the works Cauchi had carried out for Debono, were works the CMU was officially charged with doing: the repair of a dangerous wall bounding on a private piece of land, a surfaced parking space for a private residence which Giglio said was actually a public road; access roads to the San Dimitri fireworks factory; and a concrete platform for a feast statue, requested by the Gharb festa committee.
“Was this wrongful use of public funds?” Giglio asked. “Was Debono allowed, or not, to finance maintenance works for the football ground on request of Gharb mayor David Apap?” To this, Abdilla said that while Debono was authorized, these works were to the detriment of Cauchi.
“Debono did not find any time since 2006 to issue an invoice… if anything that is a breach of financial regulations,” Giglio said.
Giglio also asked Abdilla in his cross examination, whether he had unquestionably considered Cauchi to have been set for whistleblowers’ protection considering that the allegations first made the news on 8 March, and then were followed by Cauchi seeking protection under the law on 1 April.
Inspector Abdilla said the police examined the evidence seized from the Gozo ministry and that police spoke to ministry officials, but not to contractor Joe Cauchi, accused Anthony Debono, or the beneficiaries connected to the 22 sites in which the works were carried out.
Abdilla said they only interrogated the beneficiaries after hearing what Cauchi told them.
“Debono did not find any time since 2006 to issue an invoice… if anything that is a breach of financial regulations,” Giglio says. Matthew Vella