MaltaToday.com.mt - Author highlight

Malcolm Mifsud

Malcolm Mifsud is a partner at Mifsud & Associates.

Articles by this author

Administrators of a vacant inheritance have to follow appointment procedure

Law Report

Malcolm Mifsud

In their application, the plaintiffs claimed that the defendants held on to a house in St Paul’s Bay against their will and they wanted them to be evicted from this property

Court turns down plea that the applicant has other remedies

Law Report

Malcolm Mifsud

The First Hall of the Civil Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction turned down a pleasince the complaint is 50 years old

Law Report 19 May 2016, 9:00am

Harassment is harassment if there is more than one incident

Law Report 7 April 2016, 8:12am

Cash payments still have to be proved

Law Report 31 March 2016, 8:05am

A co-owner has to pay his share for urgent works

Law Report 28 March 2016, 8:39am

Damages arise when a co-owner excludes another co-owner

Law Report 17 March 2016, 7:05am

In spoliation, the perpetrator must be identified

Law Report 10 March 2016, 7:55am

Departmental decision is required for judicial review

Law Report 3 March 2016, 9:25am

Interpretation of a contract is taken from the wording of the contract

Law Report 25 February 2016, 7:49am

Court must limit itself to the ground for liquidation proposed by the plaintiff

Law Report 18 February 2016, 8:00am

Court disagrees with easement claim

Law Report 11 February 2016, 7:48am

Court orders defendants to follow up judicial letters by instituting lawsuit against plaintiff

Law Report 4 February 2016, 8:21am

No spoliation if defendant had purchased the property, with plans showing windows

Law Report 28 January 2016, 8:01am

Malcolm Mifsud

Administrators of a vacant inheritance have to follow appointment procedure

Court turns down plea that the applicant has other remedies

Harassment is harassment if there is more than one incident

Cash payments still have to be proved

A co-owner has to pay his share for urgent works

Damages arise when a co-owner excludes another co-owner

In spoliation, the perpetrator must be identified

Departmental decision is required for judicial review

Interpretation of a contract is taken from the wording of the contract

Court must limit itself to the ground for liquidation proposed by the plaintiff

Court disagrees with easement claim

Court orders defendants to follow up judicial letters by instituting lawsuit against plaintiff

No spoliation if defendant had purchased the property, with plans showing windows

Wife responsible for breakup of marriage following a one-way trip