MFSA not offering 'parity of arms' on BOV share offer - Finco

MFSA chairman Joe Bannister says regulator will not publish reports into property fund.

The financial regulator will not be publishing the three investigative reports on the La Valette multi-manager property fund as demanded by investors and Finco Treasury Management, the authors of multiple judicial protests against Bank of Valletta.

Malta Financial Services Authority chairman Prof. Joe Bannister told The Times today that the regulator has never published the report of an investigation and said that only in the property fund saga has “much fuss” been made on the publication of what is “usually considered by everyone concerned as a confidential document.”

But Finco managing partner Paul Bonello has accused the regulator of “not offering investors parity of arms” with Bank of Valletta, the custodian of the fund that lost in excess of €50 million.

The bank has offered investors a compensatory 75c per share valid for 30 days – but Bannister has asked that the offer be extended to give more time to investors “to reflect calmly, seek good advice, and take informed decisions” on the offer.

Bank of Valletta is expected to announce today whether it intends extending the offer.

“What hurts me is that articles 19 (a) and (c) of the MFSA Act is clear and unequivocal when it says the regulator must provide complainants a full copy of the report,” Paul Bonello told MaltaToday.

“We formally asked that the MFSA pronounces itself on whether the BOV offer had the prerequisites of a just offer, namely whether investors are fully informed – which they are not since only one of three investigations is complete and the reports are not being published; and because we don’t have the report itself which BOV have had for the past six months, as Bannister himself said, giving the bank ample time to study its offer.”

Bonello also slammed comments by Bannister, quoted by The Times as referring to “accusations and insinuations certain people – very unprofessionally in my opinion – thought fit to print.”

“It bothers me that he is ridiculing the protests by trying to make it seems like a big fuss. I have people crying and families who are financially destroyed – they are not in the mood for laconic and sarcastic comments.”

Bannister told MaltaToday he was abroad when asked to comment on his suggestion that BOV extends the offer.

Labour MP Evarist Bartolo, who has raised the matter of the regulator’s behaviour in parliament, said Bannister had reduced himself to an “Oliver Twist timidly asking BOV for more time for shabbily-treated investors”.

“It’s pathetic… the MFSA is showing itself a very weak regulator and is letting down the very people it is obliged to protect. Apart from betraying its mission to protect consumers, it is giving the green light to financial operators who want to abuse their clients… We need persons of the right moral calibre and professional commitment to be regulators and carry out their duties fairly and fearlessly.”

The MFSA fined BOV €347,816 for regulatory breaches in relation to the property fund, which the bank has decided to appeal. But the authority has still to conclude its two other investigations into allegations of mis-selling and access to price-sensitive information that people might have had before selling their shares.

“Both investigations are ongoing and they are both time consuming. The MFSA has to request the necessary files from the operators involved and then carry out interviews with both parties, analyse the facts and try to reach reasonable founded conclusions,” Bannister told The Times in his interview.

avatar
Anthony Haidon
An MEP has started the ball rolling in Europe, I believe it's with the Financial Commissioner. Questions will be asked and this time there will be little dilly dallying . The MFSA was, a few months ago, found to be breaching European regulations and for this it is the Government who will be held responsible. The uncaring attitude shown both by the Bank and by the authorities is shameful and I am sure Europe will agree. No European country facing a similar situation has acted the way our venerable institutions have. After all the defiant talk uttered by the chairman of the Bank, irregularities HAVE been found. So I say to all investors ' accept the offer,' unless you have money to burn, you will clearly be doing this both UNDER PROTEST AND UNDER DURESS. And remember there is nothing to stop us from seeking redress through Europe, a process which has already started. Acceptance of the offer will not sweep the matter under the carpet, the battle will go on. In the meantime the general public will be reading and assessing the kind of protection the citizen is receiving.
avatar
@ 0454755m - you think that I am on the payroll of BoV to blog in a damage limitation exercise........my foot!!! > I am not on the payroll of anyone to blog and you should refrain from making such wild accusations. I am simply stating my views on the matter to which I am fully entitled to, like ultimately you are likewise entitled to...or shall I allege that you are one of the disciples of Finco simply because you and others of your ilk have a different view on the matter. Please let us be pragmatic and accept that bloggers have different views on matters that come up and about and respect such views.
avatar
owen sammut
It seems that BOV are planting some of thier officials writing under a pen name in a futile attempt of 'damage limitation' This will not worry me in the least. Public opinion everywhere is against BOV and this is what counts. It was obvious from the start that BOV will not extend the offer. They want to come out of this mess incurring the least possible expense. They wish that most of the investors (even those who suffered mis-selling by BOV) will accept the offer. Obviously the valuation of the offer by BOV is only based on the low gearing of some similar funds but does not take into account the hundreds of investors that have been mis-sold the products which are entitled to th repayment of full capital and interest. This Pandora's box will soon be opened and will have to be faced by BOV. What about the 'insider trading' allegations? Obviously the offer by BOV is a pittance to what they should be paying but the day of reckoning will eventually come for the bank. What about the MFSA, the supposed Regulator? It does not even have the courage and the pride to publish the reports it has compiled. What Regulators do we have in this country? Puppets on a string at the beckoning of the Government and the licencees such as BOV. Mr Bonello is right. The sarcastic comments by a public institution such as the MFSA are uncalled for especially when such an institution is lacking and some of its top officers do not possess the right personality, attributes and drive to discharge properly their responsibilities. They should publish the reports since the legislation states this. Who are these people? Are they a bunch of untouchables acting outside their legal remit? One day these reports will have to be produced in a Court of Law and will serve as further evidence of the of the unprofessional way in which this fund was managed by BOV. Surely the investors are at the right side of the law but notice the panic of BOV and the MFSA. They do not even know where to start.
avatar
Il Bank imissu jirtira l offerta sakemm jitlestew l investigazzjonijiet tal MFSA. iIr rapporti ghandhom jigu ippublikati halli l investituri jaraw jekk il bank imxiex sewwa jew le. Wara ikollhom zmien jahsbu jekk jaccettawx l offeta tal bank. Irrespeddivament minn dan kollhu, meta din is saga tispicca kemm Chalmers, Depasquale u dawk kollha involuti f din il froga ghandhom ikollhom id dicenza li jirrizanjaq. Wara l bank jirrevedi l policies tieghu fuq is sales tatics, dan il hard selling mhux tajjeb ghal hadd
avatar
I truly admire Paul Bonello of Finco for what he is trying to do. He has given a voice to hundreds of investors who have lost their savings due to the unethical (and possibly criminal) behaviour of Bank of Valletta. As for those who are claiming that Finco have some commercial or hidden interest - had this been the case BOV would not have hesitated to expose them! After all, Roderick Chalmers has not been reticent so far, what with his Put up or Shut up comments and other ridiculous remarks. So cut out all the ridiculous speculation and innuendo. All of us who have lost money because of BOV are immensely grateful to Paul Bonello and his team at Finco!
avatar
Mark Fenech
The Alchemist and pcassarm. Both of you are attacking FINCO for doing the right job on behalf of their clients, but may I ask you once again to write under your true name so that we shall know what is your agenda on this case. You may be BOV employees, you may be competitors of FNCO and do not want the latter to come out of this case with flying colours. FINCO through their legal adviser, are quoting what the Regulator should do in accordance with their Act of Parliament, Mr. Bannister is just saying what they normally do, but that is not the appropriate practice according to the law establishing MFSA and Mr. Bannister has no right to decide on his own what should be done. Is he above the law aswell???? Come on show us your face so that we shall be able to know more on your agenda. Both of you are ready to accept BOV version. We, investors are not willing to accept BOV version as through the course of this saga we have come accross plenty of lies coming out from the mouths of BOV administrators. Why should we accept their version now?????? Once again I also thank Hon. Evarist Bartolo for continuing to give his support to the small investors by challenging BOV and MFSA to come clean on this very important issue.
avatar
@pcassarm At least there is someone who sees it my way.
avatar
After all the statements made by Finco over the past ten months that they have full trust and confidence in the Regulator, Mr Bonello is now making wild accusations that Malta has a weak, spineless MFSA. This is surely not shared by many industry practitioners who view the regulator as having been pivotal in the development of the financial services industry. In this technological world, it is clearly evident that Finco does not give a hoot at the international reputational damage that these statements inflict on the industry which employs thousands of workers and which is also attracting increased international interest as is evidenced by the various international financial services firms operating from Malta. My question is this....if the Offer of Bank of Valletta covers the gearing issue as being interpreted by the MFSA, what is really Finco's agenda and commercial interest in all this debacle? Clearly, they are not doing all this raucus on a pro bono basis?
avatar
@D. Borg I have my doubts to what you are saying. Lending its voice - oh come off it. You would soon say that they are the modern and maltese version of Robin Hood!! I asked a simple question which may not be that simple after all!!!
avatar
@Alchemist maybe Finco is effectively lending its voice, expertise and more to all the unqualified savers who have found their savings lumped into a fund aimed at a different type of investor. ....something which mfsa has evidently failed and is failing to do
avatar
I have already asked: What 's in it for Finco? Do they have any conflict of interest - since they are a financial intermediary operating in a small and limited market like Malta. What gives them the power to dictate? They even went so far as to threaten suing MFSA - the HIGHEST authority on the Island. Who are Finco to think it is can threaten so?