Brussels sounds warning on pensions, urges increase in retirement age

Tonio Fenech says EC assessment shows economy demonstrates sound economic results – Brussels calls for action without delay on pension reform.

In its recommendations the EC highlighted pensions as a key area of concern – just a day after the government issued a new communication on the forthcoming pension reform.
In its recommendations the EC highlighted pensions as a key area of concern – just a day after the government issued a new communication on the forthcoming pension reform.

The European Commission has warned that Malta remains at high risk to sustain public finances, due to an increase in spending on pensions and other age-related costs such as healthcare that will exceed the EU average considerably and urged the government to raise the retirement age.

In a statement, finance minister Tonio Fenech welcomed the EC's review of Malta's national reform programme fo 2012: "While noting that Malta continues to face several challenges, the Commission is clear in its praise for the steps taken by the government," Fenech said.

"The executive summary points out Malta's investment in adapting its education system to industry requirements, reducing dependency on imported fuels and increase the share of renewable energy, and the progress to raise the skill level of the workforce."

But in its recommendations the EC highlighted pensions as a key area of concern - just a day after the government issued a new communication on the forthcoming pension reform.

"A very low activity rate of older workers, including of older women; a relatively low exit age; and recourse to early retirement schemes add to the scope of the challenge," the Commission said, noting that the government has yet to announce its position on the introduction of new pillars to the pension system.

"Moreover, the National Reform Programme does not propose a comprehensive active-ageing strategy. While noting the measures introduced by Malta to combat undeclared work, its incidence also risks exerting undue pressure on the sustainability of public finances."

Brussels said Malta had to "take action without further delay" to increase the retirement age, by increasing the participation of older workers in the labour force and discourage the use of early retirement schemes; and also encourage private pension savings.

The EC said that while the economy had performed well, this had also created a mismatch between demand and supply of skills, due to a low number of university graduates and high early school-leavers. Malta is expected to present a strategy to tackle early school leaving by end of 2012, but there is no comprehensive system for collecting and analysing information on the phenomenon.

The EC noted that steps have been taken to bring women back into the labour force, but said the gender employment gap and the impact of parenthood were particularly negative for women, primarily due to the lack of affordable childcare, and low uptake of flexitime and teleworking practices.

Brussels also cited higher energy tariffs having hampered the competitiveness of SMEs, but noted efforts for the generation of solar and wind power, and building an electricity interconnector with Sicily.

The Commission also took note of an ongoing review of the Cost Of Living Adjustment index, which it said could be unfair to labour-intensive businesses, and recommended that COLA increase should reflect gains in productivity.

While the objective of the government's budgetary strategy is to reduce the deficit to 0.3% of GDP in 2015, the Commission says this could be slightly skewed due to risks of lower revenue and possible overruns in expenditure; as well as the ongoing restructuring of Air Malta and financial situation of Enemalta.

After peaking at 72% of GDP in 2011, the debt ratio is planned to reach 65.3% of GDP in 2015 - still above the 60% of GDP reference value.

avatar
Isnt' this pure interference by Brussels. Isn't this a hostile threat. Is this what we voted to when we decided to vote to join the EU. What a big shame the EU has became.
avatar
Why not investigate the people who stole hundreds of millions from Enemalta and AirMalta - and confiscate their assets ... instead of stealing the ASSETS of old people without the energy and strength to work further. Maybe they will introduce euthanasia upon retirement. Well the people sitting pretty in Brussels can look forward to a comfortable retirement flushed with money and generous pensions, while we can look forward to living in fear and anxiety, on handouts and on the verge of poverty. Let's face the facts - pension is the biggest legal PONZI scheme in existence. The money has long been stolen and we are now forced by threats to continue feeding the ponzi scheme. There is a solution, private pension funds and let individuals decide when they want to stop working. No government should be trusted with money - its like trusting a drug addict with cocaine.
avatar
I think that this issue again shows the gross incompetence of the current administration. Having joined the EU has produced certain advantages to some but it has also great disadvantages. The way workers are being treated in Malta is an example. Why increase the pension age? This is just another form of slave work and reduction in the quality of life! It seems that workers must work till they die! A 60 year old cannot compete with a 30 year old in terms of work! What has the current government really got from EU. It seems that our bargaining power is practically zero. The EU is like a dictator that is telling us what to do and implement and we have to follow blindly! Even the education policies seem to follow this pattern unfortunately! This EU seems to be full of evil. It is a place where certain persons benefit at the expense of others. The working class is being treated very badly. In reality the EU and its policies have created suffering and miseries to the working class. Poverty seems to be again rearing its head in certain families. The EU is just about totalitarian control over our lives and work. SHAME!
avatar
This report is another (I would say pathetic) attempt to defend business interests. The cherry on the cake was when it was alleged that there was, "... a low uptake of flexitime and TELEWORKING practices". Simply unbelievable and this coming from business interests which haven't emulated efforts undertaken by the public/civil service to assist employees in terms of this arrangement. It's a 'win-win' situation which can also be beneficial to reduce pressures on elderly centres and to be a further support for elderly services in the community. Mind you, this thinking mode is popular in Nordic countries!
avatar
Brussels should have highlighted the incompetence of this Government. Brussels should have also highlighted the corruption that exists, the discrimination, the utility bills, gas, fuel costs and the cost of living and most of all the irresponsible spending. The Euro has brought a nightmare to the Maltese Families. Do Brussels care about all this? Or their only interest is to get hefty Salaries, bonuses or allowances? Why don’t they decrease their Salaries to the bare minimum, instead of wanting to put age pension upwards? Why don’t they ask the Maltese Prime Minister to increase our salaries equivalent to those of theirs, or at least equivalent to €27 per hour and not just €2.7 per hour? Why didn’t Brussels mention the precarious work offered even by the Government of Malta, or this fits in their plan? Aren’t we supposed to be ALL equal or are we equal in paying taxes ONLY? Why do they get 3 years salary when they aren’t re elected to the European Parliament and then the workers when they are unemployed they just get enough to exist and not to live? Isn’t this a form of discrimination by those whom we have selected to serve in the European Parliament? Are we supposed to be your slaves, we have to work for you while you have the best of everything? Is this the kind of equality and brotherhood you speak about? Apart from all this why don’t you process the Governments that screw up everything instead of inflicting pain on the lower classes? After all who is responsible for all the mess we’re in. Is it the worker who is to blame? I know people that have worked for more than 43 years and then, to have the barest of a decent living they have to continue working. Don’t we pay enough in direct, indirect taxes and National Insurance to cover the last few years of our lives? Under the Labour’s Government the Maltese were better off since benefits used to increase ona yearly basis. Poverty disappeared from this Island. How come under the Nationalist Governments we have to go through all this hardships and seeing poverty on the inceasing. Was Mintoff right when he used to mention Cain’s and Abel’s Europe?