Bank of Valletta issues compensation to retail clients of property fund

CEO Charles Borg says bank has carried out comprehensive review of its procedures to learn from the experience and to benchmark against best-in-class standards.

Bank of Valletta chief executive Charles Borg.
Bank of Valletta chief executive Charles Borg.

Bank of Valletta has made ex-gratia payments to investors in the La Valette Multi-Manager Property Fund which were identified during a review carried out by the independent professional services firm engaged by the Malta Financial Services Authority.

The bank had already reached settlement agreements with 99 per cent of the investors in the fund, but has effected payments of €1 per share, less previous payments already made, to those investors who could not be determined by the independent professional services firm engaged by the MFSA to be "experienced investors" according to the fund prospectus, due to insufficient information or evidence.

"The bank has cooperated fully with the independent review and now that these payments - including the ex-gratia payment of €0.75 per share made unilaterally by the Bank in June 2011 - have been made, we welcome the opportunity to close this issue," BOV chief executive Charles Borg said.

"In the meantime, the bank engaged an international financial services consultancy firm to carry out a comprehensive review of its procedures to learn from the experience and to benchmark against best-in-class standards. This enabled us to move forward to ensure that we could offer our customers a better service. This has resulted in a number of procedural changes, considerable staff training, and also organisational changes, such as the opening of Investment Centres which offer our customers the chance to seek expert advice in a more discreet and professional environment," Borg said.

The file review by Mazars was ordered by the Malta Financial Services Authority back in June 2012, to review BOV's client files and establish which clients were entitled to compensation of €1 per unit invested in BOV's property fund.

The review was completed shortly before Christmas 2012.

"Most people due compensation have received credits direct into their accounts, and others will be receiving cheques shortly. BOV has written to all clients involved, informing them of the decision in the Mazars Report," the MFSA said.

The MFSA is also publishing the report prepared by Mazars [DOWNLOAD PDF] which sets out the methodology used, the conclusions and the number of BOV clients who were considered to be due compensation under the terms of this review. Those investors will have now effectively received €1.00 for every unit invested.

The MFSA has also updated the Question and Answer document on its website, that sets out many of the issues raised by consumers during the investigation.

The MFSA's investigation relating to the sales practices adopted and employed by BOV and its subsidiaries when selling shares in the property fund was closed in June 2012, having found that in various instances BOV had failed to act in the best interest of investors.

The statutory maximum fine of €203,150 was imposed on BOV for breaching licence conditions when selling units in the fund to its clients.

The MFSA also issued a directive which required BOV to co-operate with a client file review by an independent professional services firm.

The client file review, conducted at the offices of BOV, determined which of BOV's advisory client investors in the property fund could not be shown to qualify as experienced investors: investors for whom the client fact find or BOV's transaction history or other records held by BOV did not demonstrate qualification as an "experienced investor" as defined in the prospectus.

BOV has to pay all expenses relating to the client file review carried out by Mazars.

BOV has however appealed the directive which orders them to co-operate with a client file review and pay compensation to advisory client investors who were not experienced investors when the investment was made. The appeal is currently being heard by the Financial Services Tribunal. BOV is still required to comply with the directive.

 

avatar
Joseph MELI
And the other ONE per cent?It is not the BoV who has learned lessons -as they never will as profit over prevention will always rule with these financial terrorists- but rather their clients and customers and if they have any sense will make their feelings known in the only way possible -by withdrawing their funds.However,having said that what options are left for bank customers?The Blood-money ,drug-lord friendly,money-laundering too big to fail -too big to jail HSBC ? Crooks and thieves the lot of them and is your money safe in the bank?As the DCS(Depositors Compensation Scheme)is inexplicably not funded nor contributed too by the banks but is rather a self-underwritten insurance policy sponsored by the their customers/taxpayers (courtesy of our generous benefactors -the government.Incidentally ,would there be enough funds to pay out to all depositors/savers in the event of a bank or banks failure?)