Scicluna says Le Monde’s hack job of Natixis report ‘sensationalist’
‘Malta is not Cyprus’, says Natixis but Le Monde claims Malta ‘could be next detonator of European crisis’
French newspaper Le Monde was accused of sensationalism by Malta's finance minister Edward Scicluna, after apparently misrepresenting a Natixis comparison of Maltese and Cypriot banks by claiming that Malta could be the source of a new crisis.
While the French investment bank's report claimed outright that Malta "was not Cyprus" and that its 'non-core' and foreign banks were not carriers of risk, Le Monde's reading of the report overturned the verdict, headlining its article with portentous tone: 'Malta, next detonator for a European crisis?'
READ Natixis: Are Maltese banks risk-carriers? [French]
Sounds ominous, but Natixis's conclusion is clear enough: international banks in Malta are not carriers of risk, Maltese domestic banks - like Bank of Valletta, HSBC Malta, APS, Banif and Lombard Bank - are well capitalised, and though remaining exposed to the credit extended to a dampened construction and property sector, the country's sound fundamentals make up for this apparent risk.
"The risk of contagion from non-resident deposits after the Cypriot episode is counterbalanced by the fact that the non-resident deposits are essentially those of international banks' parent companies. Finally, the relative confidence that Malta enjoys in the markets does not sound unjustified."
Not so Le Monde, which latched on the similarities between the two islands: small, open economy, a fast expansion of the financial services system, and an accommodating fiscal system that attracts much offshore business. With its banking sector at some eight times the size of Malta's GDP, this would be "too big to save" if the sovereign had to intervene and bail out the banks.
"It is quite unfortunate that another sensational article has found its way, this time, into Le Monde," said finance minister Edward Scicluna, who said the article's slant and speculative headline were "completely devoid of the truth... more authoritative bodies that have carried out serious and close evaluations of the Maltese banking sector have concluded the opposite."
Far from it, Natixis cautions its readers "not to force the comparison" between Malta and Cyprus: the greater part of Malta's banks is firmly compartmentalised between core banks like BOV and HSBC Malta, non-core banks like Volksbank and FIMBank, and international banks like Garanti of Turkey. While the Bank of Cyprus and Laiki represented 55% of the Cypriot banking sector and 400% of GDP, Malta's domestic banks represent 222% of GDP.
Even then, the international banks - 500% of GDP - are not carriers of risk. An important rejoinder would be Standard & Poor's recent reminder that the two islands were incomparable. Malta would only have to support banks that take deposits and lend domestically - international banks like Akbank and Garanti use Malta as a booking centre for foreign-exchange loans, but do not take local deposits or lend to Maltese residents.
So hypothetically, if a Turkish bank had to cease operations the result would likely be "at worst a minor shock to the economy and nothing like recent events in Cyprus". Even if HSBC Malta finds itself in difficulty, it would be its UK parent, HSBC Bank plc - which has a higher credit rating than the Republic of Malta - that would likely extend assistance.
"The Maltese banking sector is fundamentally different from that of Cyprus," Scicluna said. "We need only refer to the numerous following recent post-Cyprus crises studies on Malta as proof of this, and of the stability of Malta's banking sector. Among them, there are the reports issued by the Malta Central Bank, Bloomberg News Service, credit rating agencies Fitch and Standard & Poor's, and the conclusions of the European Commission's In-Depth Review for Malta, which have all underlined the inherent differences between Cyprus' and Malta's respective banking sectors, and that there is no risk of contagion from the Cypriot crisis."