Judge finds BP 'grossly negligent' in Gulf spill

Ruling opens oil giant to $18 billion in potential civil penalties

The spill in 2010 sent an estimated 5 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, wreaking havoc on the ecosystem
The spill in 2010 sent an estimated 5 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, wreaking havoc on the ecosystem

In the four years since the incident on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig killed 11 workers and sent millions of barrels of oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico, BP has spent more than $28 billion on damage claims and cleanup costs, pleaded guilty to criminal charges and emerged a shrunken giant.

Through it all however, the company has maintained that it was not chiefly responsible for the accident, and that its contractors in the operation, Halliburton and Transocean, should shoulder some of the blamce.

Yesterday, a federal judge rejected those arguments, finding that BP was indeed the primary culprit and that only it had acted with “conscious disregard of known risks.” He added that BP’s “conduct was reckless.”

By finding that BP was, in legal parlance, grossly negligent in the disaster, and not merely negligent, United States District Court Judge Carl J. Barbier opened the possibility of $18 billion in new civil penalties for BP, nearly quadruple the maximum Clean Water Act penalty for simple negligence and far more than the $3.5 billion the company has set aside.

The gound-breaking ruling in environmental law serves as a warning for the oil companies that continue to drill in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, where high pressures and temperatures in the wells test the most modern drilling technologies. The spill was the largest offshore spill in American history.