The hunt for the ‘liberals’

The rise of illiberalism within the PN has been too strong for their appeal to ‘liberals’ to be credible. If GonziPN wants to reestablish itself, it needs more than a rebranding exercise.

In post-divorce referendum Malta, the ‘liberals’ are in vogue. The two main political parties are falling all over themselves to win the hearts and minds of ‘liberals’. Yet, they fail to ground their appeal in any vision that shows signs of a liberal agenda.

The Nationalist Party (PN) “has embarked on a drive to attract liberal candidates for the next general election” and the Labour Party (PL) is the “home of liberal-minded people“. What they mean by the term ‘liberal’ is not clear; like ‘conscience’ and ‘the common good’, it is another term being used and abused.

Labour Party Leader Joseph Muscat seems to define it around a single issue – divorce. The fact that he took a personal stand in favour of divorce, while the party did not, is enough for him to fly the liberal flag. But what the Leader of the Opposition embraces is not liberal democracy; it is consumer politics, in which one’s vote is seen not as a responsibility to choose what is best for the country but as an instrument of self-interest.

It involves a view of voters as consumers rather than rational citizens. Instead of treating them as people you can appeal to with ideas, with the aim of persuading them, you treat them as a static given, as something you need to change your policies to satisfy. And instead of feeling that you can stick to your principles and lead people to a future on the basis of a vision, you need to learn their short-term wants and move yourself to accommodate them.

In his attempt to please everyone Joseph Muscat stands for everything, and nothing. His politics is characterised by a mess of contradictory positions with one main concern – immediate popularity. The issue he raises most frequently is water and electricity bills – the same issue that consistently tops consumer concerns in surveys. He promises he will lower costs for consumers, without presenting a satisfactory or convincing argument to the question ‘how’?

If politics is seen simply as ‘buying’ consumers in a political marketplace, it will soon lose all coherence, and hence, in the longer term, it will lose all credibility. Pure manoeuvre replaces attempts to reflect values. This is a problem that both of the main political parties need to address.

The Nationalist Party are masters of consumer politics, with their ‘rainbow of opinions’. The GonziPN brand built before the last general elections secured the party another term in office, but at what cost? An identity crisis. The party satisfied the personal demands of citizens and lobby groups, even when those demands conflicted with the broader public interest.  As a result, they face a sea of disillusionment and the GonziPN brand has lost its market value because credibility is vital to the success of any brand.

The PN’s Information Director, Frank Psaila, made a public appeal to his party to “forcefully put forward its social liberal agenda”. It may have been a surprise to many that the party actually had one. In fact, he said “more concrete measures need to be taken, not least legislating some ‘much needed and long overdue civil liberties the country can’t afford to postpone any longer’.”

The fact that the party in government for more than two decades has not legislated “much needed” and “long overdue” civil rights, makes it glaringly obvious that these issues are not a priority.

Meanwhile, the party’s Information Director admits the PN’s grass roots are “conservative by nature”. He is promoting a social liberal agenda and at the same time saying that “no way did his proposals mean that the party should alienate its grass roots… but it is a given that unless the party caters for many a social liberal it will have a difficult task come 2013″.

He did not explain how the PN can reconcile the contradictory values that characterise conservatives and liberals. In the meantime, the party in government is clearly entrenched in the conservative camp, led by a Cabinet whose vision is largely limited to the divine kind. The only reason they are showing a sudden consideration of ‘liberals’ is their electoral interests.

In this context, calls for “liberal candidates” smack of spin rather than sound political vision. The rise of illiberalism within the PN has been too strong for their appeal to ‘liberals’ to be credible. If GonziPN wants to reestablish itself, it needs more than a rebranding exercise.

This political manoeuvring by the PN and the PL is one of the factors behind growing disillusion with politics in Malta, which in turn is a major threat to political freedom, as disillusion turns inevitably to cynicism. It is the opposite of what a social liberal agenda sets out to achieve.

The country needs democratic reform to address the inadequacies that are the result of these two parties’ control of political processes. The ‘liberals’ they are now targeting will influence which of them gets the reins… it is now time for the ‘liberals’ to voice their demands and articulate the change they want to see. If they don’t, the political parties will do it for them and the only change that will be seen will be in language, not policies.

Caroline Muscat is a freelance journalist. She was awarded the European Commission's national prize for journalism against discrimination in 2010. Read her blog here.

avatar
Joseph Sant
@bejn il-linji. There's nothing I love more in life than a good hearty laugh. Sadly however this time I fail to see your joke. Maybe you could explain? What's so funny about one person being in favour of an idea but not imposing his own opinion on everyone else? Personally I find it much more hilarious, illogical and incomprehensible that a party should collectively take a stand against something while at the same time saying that everyone can do what the heck they like. Now that I find really funny!
avatar
Soldarity, Do not mention the one public holiday. The greatest victory for the working class was when both parties wanted to agree on having just one national day. We ended up with five ! We may soon see the addition of another public holiday. When shortly Opus Dei open an office in Malta, Gonzi may give us another feast - Oh Puss Day !!!!
avatar
Labour Party Leader Joseph Muscat seems to define it around a single issue – divorce. The fact that he took a personal stand in favour of divorce, while the party did not, is enough for him to fly the liberal flag. while the party did not..... What a joke!!!!!
avatar
I fully agree with Gecko here. It has become a habit of certain opinion makers to say that both large parties are the same for the only sake of keeping a so called "independent" face. . In reality, the PL has historically been more secular and liberal than the PN. One only need to mention the separation of state-church. When it comes today, its pro-gay policy clearly mark the PL more liberal than the PN. If you want to dismiss that as opportunism - then so be it. Either way, minorities are getting more rights and protection. A point should also be made that divorce got through because of a majority of PL supporters voting in favour of divorce.
avatar
I don't label myself liberal, quite contrary I am more of a conservative. On the other hand I feel better represented by Muscat then Gonzi. I feel that The PN has been reduced to a puppet show in the hands of either the EU masters or the church. We feel grateful whenever a big EU nation take 10 immigrants, we loan Greece millions of euros without asking the EU big guys for anything in exchange and whenever Brussels/Church tells them to jump, Gonzipn limits himself to ask how high. That's got to stop.
avatar
You write: "Labour Party Leader Joseph Muscat seems to define it around a single issue – divorce. " This is patently wrong. One need only mention his stance on gay rights. Caroline Muscat seems to have a rather highly selected view of Maltese history.
avatar
Excuse me miss or mrs. but the labour party has been a liberal party a long time ago. Who legislated in favour of homosexuals. Who fought and finally introduced the 6 points, including civil marriage and taxing the church income. Who gave the vote to women? Who gave the vote to 18 year olds? Who introduced free education? Who introduced social services? . If that is not liberal enough for you my dear than we are living on different planets.
avatar
Caroline Muscat is so obvious and not at all surprising. Her opening paragraph is a sequence of downright distortions of facts. Dr. Joseph Muscat, right from his very first speech as party leader, made it clear that his vision for Labour is that of a MOVEMENT AND A COALITION of liberals. He also made it amply clear that none were barred and all were welcome with open arms TO JOIN THIS MOVEMENT OF LIBERAL-MINDED PEOPLE WHOSE INTERESTS ARE IN DOING WHAT'S BEST FOR THE COUNTRY, IN THE BEST WAY ONE FITS IN! The list of people who turned up to that call included those: (1) who had long turned away from Labour; (2) who never ever thought they'll come ANYWHERE CLOSE TO labour; (3) who felt uncomfortable functioning within the emerging /GonziPN. The list of people who answered the call was amazing and staggering. Right from the start Joe Muscat called out loud that the LP is now the movement and natural home of all liberal-minded people of good will and good intent. This statement was shouted out by Joseph Muscat well before the divorce issued ever got underway. Towards the end of Ms Muscat’s nauseatingly useless piece she regales us with her personal distortion of what's liberalism and liberal thought. She conveniently and most disrespectfully avoids the damning historic fact that: (1) the NP and GonziPN have been in power for 30 years (or quasi), (2) have been all the time promising heaven-on-earth to everybody, from hunters to dog-lovers, from investers to dock workers from saints to sinners, (3) have made virtue and art out of lies, half-truths, payoffs, commissions, murky deals and nepotism. After years of abusive misgoverning a whole country for the benefit of much less than half the population, and with the national wealth and assets swiftly vanishing off into thin air, that select gang is now kicking and biting within itself to compete for what’s left for grabs. That exclusive gang has become selective even within itself. It’s not just whose blood is bluest that gets what’s left of the national cake, it’s HE who can exert the strongest and most painful squeeze on some well-placed dangling bunch that gets the goodies that’s left. Blue is the banner that attract the gullibles. When GonziPN aims for the liberals he's aiming at those thousands who have over the years realized what perfect hopeful twerps they’ve been all those years they were taken in by NP professional liars and scoundrels.
avatar
Joseph Sant
I believe I have read paragraphs three to six of your article in a hundred other blogs by various writers over the past couple of years... almost in identical words. Everyone seems to pooh pooh Joseph Muscat's liberal credentials but if truth be told if today we are looking at legislating divorce in this country it is because Joseph Muscat introduced the public debate even before he was elected to the party leadership. The Labour Party since it's inception has always stood for social liberalism whether you care to admit it or not. The PN on the other hand has favoured economic liberalism at the expense of the environment and social equality. And look at the mess they have landed us in! In the sixties Maltese citizens left these islands in droves because they were starving. In the seventies and eighties many came back. Today they (especially the young) are once again leaving in droves because the atmosphere in this blessed country of ours is suffocating them - they yearn for individual freedoms a stagnant government refuses to give them. Playing the liberal card will not crack it this time for the PN - their credibility is zero.
avatar
This situation had to arise sooner or later. A liberal mentality is equivalent to a more individualistic approach or outlook and our political system is at a loss how to deal with it. So much so there is total confusion whenever a politician dares speak out of line and the subsequent fears of total anarchy invariably follow. This not only confuses and scares the electorate but actually stamps liberal thinking solely as a mutiny to undermine the political parties ( which is maybe the reason why liberal thinking is almost totally alien amongst our present stock of parliamentarians). Our problem in Malta is that we still lack a more healthy measure of liberal thinkers with the result that our electoral system has always been a game of musical chairs of the same stereotyped politicians. A dejected populance may be the result but after all we are the ones voting every few years and our country is simply getting the politicians we deserve, no more and no less.
avatar
Liberals adhere to a conception of état laïque which is neutral to all religious (whether believing in one or more gods, whether small or large in number of adherents) and non-religious beliefs (including agnostics and atheists). With freedom for - the citizen - defined as being free and equal - religion is referred to the private sphere. However, sometimes ‘private’ is interpreted as a demand for individualism, meant in the sense that organised religion in civil society should be rejected. But nothing could be more wrong. Liberalism welcomes people joining together in voluntary organisations for different important issues, like religions - as without a vivid civil society with a large variety of organisations and associations we do not have a liberal society! But on the other hand, in today’s world were diversity in society is becoming increasingly explicit, the State has to stand for human rights and values that are neutral to different religious interpretations and values and norms. To privalage certain religious movements in the civil society to the detriment of others only creates unnecessary divisions in society. Any democratic reform must therefore be towards an all inclusive society, were like a “melting pot,” the total sum of the parts that make the ‘whole’ blend together - equally. But isn’t it a true Republic that can guarantee this end, were the ‘citizen’ – being fee and equal – is what really matters? Freedom to choose one’s belief or non-belief system is a fundamental right belonging to the private sphere and to the civil society. Religious and non-belief communities should be free from influence from the State. It is in this respect, that the State must be neutral!
avatar
All we liberal PN supporters, some of us leaving the party (like I did) want is for Gonzi and his entourage to leave the party and elect somebody who is more humanistic and in touch with people of all sorts, str8s, gays, handicapped etc etc. Only this move can salvage the party from total disaster.
avatar
How can the PN attract liberals with its eternal 'Regio et Patria' doctrine? Regio & Patria can only bring the like from EFA's breed and recently he has how liberal (and democratic) he really is. There are no half measures. You are either ultra conservative like the PN has always boasted to be (under the veil of Democratic Christians) or you not. In their glorious times if you were not on their side you were branded a communist.
avatar
During the campaign of the divorce referendum, the masses of our country, men and women, PN and PL liberals, were eager to clasp hands across their political chasm which has so long divided them. There is hope that finally the Maltese people understand the need for political maturity, where theocracy must be eradicated in order for a secular state to fulfill its civil rights obligations. The referendum result has shown that the cultivation of liberalism is alive and well in Malta and the party that is seeking the mandate to govern in the next election better be prepared to pay close attention to the will of the people who resented the interference of the Catholic Church in Malta over civil matters. Over the years the Catholic Church has advertised itself as an organization for good and a bulwark against evil amongst non-Catholics, professing doctrines widely associated with the concept of morality and human values. Liberalism is Malta is now questioning this Catholic Church that excommunicated politicians in the 1950’s & 1960’s for their liberal thinking or is prepared to excommunicate women for attempting to become priests but does not excommunicate priests for raping children. The same Catholic Church that has put itself in the forefront by teaching against contraception and doctors threatened with excommunication for performing abortions to save a mother’s life- even when the mother is a nine year old girl raped by her step father and pregnant with twins.- but it tolerated fascism and did not excommunicate a single member of the Third Reich for committing genocide. One must commit to hope that the new age of global information sharing will continue to fulfill the Maltese hunger for the liberal truth that has been missing for the last half a century and bring a new dawn on this country when it comes to electing its representation in parliament.
avatar
Can anyone remind me please how the PN in opposition said it would reduce the electricity tariffs increase raised by Alfred Sant? Also was it good critisizm by the PN opposition to stop the cottonera yacht marina because there was a hut selling lemonade? I believe it is good that the PL does not act as the PN in oposition benches. And by the way the PN when in opposition protested on roads for extra public holidays. What a great opposition we had we had a day off but the economy was ok then under the PL so we could afford it. I remember Louis Galea telling us on TV that money no problem so all his and his party policies could be done since money was no problem? I really don't imagine Joseph Muscat say these words after nearly 30 years of PN rule. Well for sure Joseph muscat would not have given himself a pay rise whilst asking us to sacrifice for our country that is for sure.