Be yourself or stop being yourself

An open letter to Joseph Muscat

Dear Dr Muscat,

I hope you will be here around this Sunday to read this. 

It is the eve of Santa Marija and most of the population is either outdoors, in Gozo, or on the beach. 

This is probably your last quiet summer before the next election. 

I’m pretty certain you won’t be taking it that easy, when that time comes.

But let’s get to the point. 

I assure you, none of this letter is plagiarised. Poor Nikita Alamango and stupid David Agius would have carelessly copied some missal and sent it you.

The other day, you met a delegation from the hunters’ federation.  I don’t know why you even bother.

Do you mean to tell me that you will be caving to their demands?

Can’t you see that they are a dying breed, and that their voting lobby is one big bluff?

Or are you hungry after each and every vote?

Can’t you see that if you are to be Prime Minister in two years time, hunting and trapping will be more regulated than ever before? You cannot suck up to each and every lobby. People want strong leaders, not ones who say ‘yes’ to everything.

But on to more mundane matters.

Let me start by stating that yes, the Nationalist administration is not fit for office. But that does not mean voters believe you to be the better alternative.

I am of the opinion that the Gonzi administration is expired, and is now wasting all its time on surviving and doing little to administer the country.

You are being criticised for not coming up with concrete proposals.

You are arguing that if you are to publish these proposals, they will be dismantled by the ‘free’ media and the Nationalist media machinery.

This is all probably true… but you have no alternative except to make your proposals known.

And those proposals should be presented by the people who are expected to captain their implementation. 

If the men and women who are presenting these policies have skeletons in their closets then rest assured that someone will expose them before the election. And unlike the JPO contract – which was kept a secret until the eve of the March 2008 election – the Nationalists have a knack to dig deep and display them for their own purposes.

You are also being taken to task for taking in everyone into party.

I would tend to agree. Having welcomed Marisa Micallef Leyson, who crossed over, and then proceeding to embrace Cyrus Engerer were seen by you as pluses. But are they long term investments. 

My view is that Labour has enough good quality people to foster.

There is a great inferiority complex – fuelled by the hate and bile bloggers – who picture Labour as party of the underclass, and a bunch of morons.

Rest assured that there is a real concern – that if you are in government, their fiscal umbilical cord will be severed. So expect them to be vicious.

The best policy is to ignore this class talk and outdated view of political campaigning.

If the Nationalists want to see what ‘class’ is all about, they should parachute into a coffee morning with Clyde Puli in Qormi

Maybe then all these refined PN women and men can be dragged off to Baia beach to linger on with those who consider themselves custodians of a great body and classy style… even though, I have to say, some Qormi girls have curves like nothing I have ever seen.

You will also be facing a gargantuan task if you are to do what Lawrence Gonzi promised… and then simply not deliver. Just to remind you: he promised a new way of doing politics and did the complete opposite.

You will have to make many sacrifices if you are to implement his idea of ‘a new way of doing politics’.

After 25 years in government, you have a regiment of angry and frustrated Labourites who want blood and revenge. But they also want to be given appointments.

If Gonzi had any sense, he would have widened his network of appointments and regulated the extent of his apartheid system.  Stupidly, he did the complete opposite, abetted by the puerile petty politics of his soldiers Edgar Galea Curmi and Gordon Pisani.

How are you going to tackle this?

Good one. You will have to be tough.

And tough means appearing tough.

There’s nothing wrong with changing all the political appointees, but don’t then replace them with creatures who spout red fumes instead of blue smoke.

So the blend must be based on meritocracy.

Everyone will welcome fresh faces, but they must be competent people, and not buttheads who are only good at looking good.

The same applies to everything else: from ambassadors, to TV hosts, to consultants and even Commissioners of Police.

Meritocracy is the answer?

Then you have the long list of businessmen and women who are now embracing Labour. They are obviously not endeared to Labour for ideological reasons, but surely because of the fact that they have been forgotten by the PN in favour of big giants like Zaren, and are the recipients of repeated circulars from the contracts division that their tender applications has been turned down.

That will mean that they expect to be given preference.

You will have a very difficult time saying ‘no’.

When you start saying ‘yes’, there will be no turning back.

Elected as Prime Minister, you will be facing an amazing economic crisis. Apologists such as Pierre Portelli argue that the country is least affected by the crisis. He would not know of a crisis of course… unlike him, many small businesses make money by creating their own money and not depending on the benevolence of government.

But anyhow, in government, you will be facing a debt crisis of enormous proportions, you will not be able to tax more and you will have no money to dish out to ease the great stress index on the middle class.

You would have to make a Thatcherite move and go for a windfall tax on the banks, which could give you a small reprieve.

A windfall tax is a difficult decision, but you will have no money to spare.

You would also need to create a feel good factor to people.

How, is the question?

For one, the state of our surroundings should be given priority. 

EU funds should be centralised and utilised to upgrade our infrastructure.

Not only that, you will need to eradicate the warden system once and for all and give more of a role to the police. Beef up the police and divert all funds to the police, make them a force that could gain our respect, and which is made up of respectable men and women.

The social welfare gap cannot be solved by simply saying “we have a problem.” You will need to look at the private pension system and think of incrementing the social contributions for pension system.

The same will apply for the health system. Mater Dei cannot solve its problems with waiting list if it does not have doctors and paramedics to man the rosters. That means money, more money… and there is no money. So you will have to sit down with the private insurance companies to devise a private health scheme that works.

You will also need to eradicate all the private contracts at Mater Dei, with the security firms and clerical and cleaning staff.

The property crisis cannot be solved by simply doing away with MEPA and the high tariffs, but rather by reviving our city centres. Renovation and reconstruction should be the buzz words. Extensive underground parking to allow businesses to attract clients who cannot get to retail centres should be a starting point.

New initiatives to gentrify our centres and to bring life back into our centres, whether it is business or domestic.

The construction industry can get back on its feet without some direction.

But before doing that, the hoarding of property can be stopped by introducing incentives or doing the unthinkable and introducing a hoarding tax.

Getting into government not because you offer policies but simply because your opponent has lost the plot, is like winning a football game based on auto goals.

You have to work on policies, and implementing policies. 

This country can work. It can have a smaller government which serves the people rather than construct hurdles for creating business and investing.

Which is why MaltaEnterprise must be turned upside down and, together with commercial officers in our embassies, attract more investment which is supported by the best conditions one could ever think of. Doing away with people like the man who likes cars and crashes them – Mr Alan Camilleri, who is more preoccupied about the body hairs of his staff members than anything to do with business.

Business across the board should be given the kiss of life, venture capital should be made available to allow new business ideas to flourish. Companies that have been diligent and paid their VAT and national insurance and tax on time should be given some ‘credit’ for their financial diligence.

The idea of awarding amnesties to defaulters should stop.

The collection of tax should remain a priority and should not be influenced by any policy change.

But the legal provisions for criminalising failure to respect deadlines should be reviewed.

The great challenge in the next years will be the creation of jobs.

Gozo should be a centre for government’s processing centres in tax, inland revenue and social security. That way, employment there will be given a boost.

The idea of defying the tradition of expecting employment to be generated from the traditional manufacturing concept should be discarded.

The dream of having Malta serve as a Smart hub for IT development and services may well be the solution for the young IT-fluent generation… very much in the same way that Austin Gatt’s farcical vision at Xghajra with Dubai TECOM was supposed to develop.

The next years will see the turmoil in North Africa turn into an opportunity that cannot be ignored. Your policies on the refugee crisis must change from being xenophobic to being humane and forward-looking, and your vision for Maltese investment and presence in the area should be opportunistic.

Malta’s positioning in the international sphere can also bring prestige and finance.  We should be promoters of initiatives, and offer a base for mega-companies involved in energy to set up research here, together with a more pro-active university.  Research institutes beyond the one office institute confine in language, in Mediterranean studies and regional conflicts should be welcomed. 

The hospital should specialise in promoting special centres attracting foreign patients for certain medical treatment. A specialisation in the field of cardiology comes to mind, but there certainly are others.

In tourism, it is about time we come to terms with the fun side, which will require a government that relaxes regulations which attract hordes of rowdy young tourists. Yes, we may need to take a small chunk of the Ibiza crowd, but for that to happen, we will have to change.

On the other hand, the idea of going for the high end of cultural tourists and promoting small boutique hotels in Valletta, the three cities and other localities may well serve to bring an added sector to our tourism.

As you eye Castille, I ask you: do you have an idea how to handle the burocracy that inflicts every segment of government?

Apart from the fact that the civil service in general will do anything that’s possible to disrupt you.

And finally, there are important institutions which need to be reformed if the country is to leap into the 21st century. I would suggest a closer look at the resources and independence of the judiciary, the police and the auditor general.

At the importance of transferring the role of the Commission on corruption to a inquiring magistrate and of giving an executive role. 

At the importance of taking PBS and transforming State TV into a channel that serves a democracy and provides a solid educational and cultural role, should be a top priority.

In all these priorities, the implementation can only be successful if the right people are chosen. People who are committed to making change, and not just committed to having a bigger salary and perks.

It’s not going to be easy. 

But as you look at these points, I am sure you are still wondering whether it is possible to get to Castille in the first place. On a personal level, you are more liberal than the present Prime Minister, give credence to that label and use that new symbol to promote a cultural change in a society overtaken by the supremacy of the Church and dominated by the networking ‘mafia’ of the last years.

As in all things in life, you can never be sure that you will win the next election. The ball, I’m afraid, is in your court. Don’t expect anyone to do the dirty work for you. 

Most especially the press and the media, who are traditionally either emotionally and financially attached to the PN or too mindless to take a decision.

Yours sincerely,

Saviour Balzan

 

This article appeared in the Maltatoday printed edition of 14 August, 2011

avatar
@briffy "The PM warned that there were black clouds looming on the horizon, He did not promise pies in the skies, ............" . I agree with salgister, didn't he promis a cut in income tax for the higher 35%bracket? Briffy get your facts right before wrinting silly posts. Of course gonziPN was very prudent, OMG this beats the lot.
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
@briffy "The PN as usual was very frank and prudent in the election runup". Nearly fell out of the chair laughing! Now pull the other one!
avatar
@ Salgister...there again you are mistaken..The PN as usual was very frank and prudent in the election runup. The PM warned that there were black clouds looming on the horizon, He did not promise pies in the skies, like the reduction in utility rates which would have attracted more voters. It was Labour that promised a 50% reduction in the utility rates; fortunately people saw through this and were not taken in. If you have in mind the PN promise to reduce the top tax-rate to 25%, it's a good thing that the measure was not adopted; for the simple reason that the time is not ripe for its adoption. Although it appears strange prima facie that JM is still clamouring for the adoption of this measure (in fact Malta's Labour is the only socialist party in the EU to clamour for tax-cuts) it's not so odd on closer examination; one must remember that the beneficiaries of such a measure are only those earning more than Eur40 000 which, incidently includes all MPs. So it's not as mad as it looks; charity begins at home.
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
@briffy. PL's manifesto is hullabaloo?!!! Either you don't know the PN's manifesto or you want to ridicule our intelligence. In the last election the PN promised the wind. Now it's reaping what it has sown!
avatar
This thing about Labour's manifesto is a lot of hullabaloo. It's just a myth. What are people expecting, the coming of the Messiah? It reminds one of the budgets of the 1980s when people used to hope for the reduction of prices of some commodities, the end of the wage freeze or that workers in some factories would go back to a five day week The upshot used to be the reduction of a few mils in the price of tuna cans, or a Lm1 increase in wages. Again this time, the people are hoping for a promise to reduce the utility rates and the fuel prices, or a substantial increase in the minimum wage. Fuel prices can be reduced only if the price of oil goes down, or if the fuel tax is reduced. While the former does not depend on the local administrations, the latter can be done - but this will bring in its wake the introduction of other taxes, unless one is prepared to increase budget deficits. Increases in the minimum wage can only be marginal because of competitivity. Going beyond a certain level would result in reduction in exports and the attendant job losses, something which no government would want to happen. So it would be foolish to raise people's hopes in the run-up to elections; not all the people are stupid and the one's who aren't can tell between promises that can be kept post election and those that can't.
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
By any chance has any read "The Independent" article on the same subject by Stephen Calleya. It is more objective than Saviour's. And well written too! Sorry Saviour, not this time.
avatar
An excellent analysis. Prosit!
avatar
You have to know when to hold them know when to fold them know when to walk away know when to run You don't count your money while sitting at the table There will time enough for counting When the dealing's done. . Kenny Rogers.
avatar
How easy it is to comment when you are inside looking out. . I might agree with most of what you wrote but you are doing the mistake to belittle PL equating it with gonziPN. This craving by gonziPN and your goodself for PL to show its hand is simply senseless, every poker player worth his salt knows when to hold his cards, fold them or show his hand, it is simply not the time yet. So just sit back and pontificate since you do not have the urge to play party politics and speculate until such time your curiosity is satisfied.
avatar
Always spot on SAVIOUR!
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
@Briffy. Jien bhalek pensjonant u ma nafx fejn hu t-terrur tal-pulizija li qieghed issemmi. Taf x'naf li min kien imexxi l-pulizija u gabha f'li gabha bhala fama, hadu l-promotion taht gvern Nazzjonalista. Kellu jkun Dr. Sant li qalfathom il-barra, biex illum taht Gvern Nazzjonalista, x'uhud minnhom anke kuntratti favoluzi mal-gvern ghandhom. Hallina tridx!
avatar
IN MY OPINION, there are some good ideas in there and there are some bad ones - other things are missing. But don't you think it is a little presumptuous, even for you Mr. Balzan, to write about all these topics as though your opinions are the gospel truth?
avatar
Luke Camilleri
Give the man a chance, he has always proved himself in all challenges he undertook, always had the National Interest at Heart , and let's face it when he was an MEP he truly got something from the EU for all the Maltese Families, lest one forget! We certainly know where we are with Joseph who makes his intentions known ...and does not wait for a referendum result to be published! He has his ears to the ground, the feel of the people's pulse AND MOST OF ALL HE IS WITH US with a heart that truly feels the aches of the populace and not like Dr. Gonzi with a HEART THAT VOTES SO FERVENTLY FOR INCREASES IN SURCHARGES ON BILLS AND FOR HEFTY PAYRISES PERKS AND HONORARIA for him and his coterie!
avatar
@ Salgister........ Il-Mintoff regime tqisux. Dak kien zmien it-terrur. L-anqas Boffa ma ghamel il-full term - veru ghax Mintoff kissirlu l-partit. U fl-1958 Mintoff irrizenja ghax ried izjed flus mill-Ingilterra u ma rnexxilux. U fl-1998 Sant waqqghu Mintoff. Insomma kull fejn kien hemm Mintoff dejjem inkwiet u qtih il-qalb/ Issa trid tiftakar li qabel l-Indipendenza il-gvernijiet kien qishom kunsill lokali. Foreign affairs kienu f'idejn l-Imperial government; law and order kien johodha l-Imperial government malli things get out of hand. Kien wara l-Independenza li l-gvernijiet lokali kont tista' ssejhilhom gvernijiet. Issa x'gara fil-1971; Malta kienet sarat kolonija tal-Libja - he who pays the piper plays the tune. Jalloud li kien PM mill-1972-77 kien gej u sejjar Malta. Gaddafi kien jigi hawn u jindirizza l-mass meetings tal-MLP qisu qieghed go Tripli. Malta saret police state..insomma m'ghandniex ghalfejn noqoghdu nerghu nirrepetu. Kull minn jien Malta daq iz-zmien jaf minn xhiex ghaddiet Malta.
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
@briffy. Ghalfejn Gvernijiet Laburisti m'ghamlux il-full term? Mela nsejt 1971-1981. Dawk zewg terms. 1955-1958 kien hemm il-glieda ma' l-Inglizi. Mintoff ma riedx icedi ghat-theddid ta' l-Inglizi b'hekk irrizenja. Mhux ghax ma kienx jaf jiggverna. 1981 ma nsterqet l-ebda elezzjoni. L-elezzjoni kienet mirbuha kostituzzjonalment, u l-ebda tidwir tal-kliem ma jista' jibdlu dan. Tkunx daqshekk brainwashed li temmen din. Dwar ta' Dr. Alfred Sant, taf x'kienet ir-ragunu ghalfejn issejhet l-elezzjoni. Dr. Sant ma riedx ikun pupu ta' hadd, u ma ried il-hadd li joqghod jigbdulu l-ispaga minn wara l-kwinti. U btw bejn 1981-1987 il-Gvern Laburista t-term kollu ghamel minkejja x-xkiel li kellu mill-oppozizzjoni Nazzjonalista. Mela gejn ma jafux jiggverna l-Partit Laburista. Taf x'naf, li kull meta jkun hemm Gvern Laburista hlief bsaten fir-roti ma sabx. Issa naraw fit-2013 jekk hux se jigri l-istess. Niggarantilek minn issa li taht Gvern Laburista nergghu nibdew naraw protesti nazzjonali, azzjonijiet industrijali, boycotts, ecc. Iz-zmien itina parir.
avatar
Sur Montebello.....Jien ma nithallas min hadd, Jien pensonjant u ma ghandi l-ebda umbilical chord mwahhalla ma' hadd. Jien li ghidt huwa kollu veru u hadd ma jista' jmerih. Jien ghamilt 40 sena f'karigi gholjin fic-civil u hdimt mal-Colonial government, PN u MLP u nista' nitkellem ghax kelli first hand experience. Bil-fors li l=performance tal-gvernijiet trid tinkompara biss bejn iz-zmien ta' GBO, Fenech Adami u Mintoff. Sant kull ma ghamel 22 xahar fil-gvern u kkommentajt ukoll fuq dan. Imma l-Labour ilu ma jkun fil-gvern mill-1987 allura bil-fors li wiehed irid jikkompara ma' 70s u l-80s. Huwa fatt li l-ebda gvern laburista minn wara WW2 ma ghamel it-term tieghu. Mintoff ghamel zewgt terms; it-tielet term ghamlu ghax seraq l-elezzjoni tal-1981. Ghaliex l-ebda gvern laburist ma rnexxilu jaghmel il-full term?. Ghax ma jafx jiggverna. Period
avatar
@ briffy Possibbli int ma ghandekx x'tghamel f'hajtek hlief tikteb fuq il- blogs biex tfahhar dak kollu li huwa nazzjonalist mis sema l-isfel? Int jew bniedem idisprat ghax bhall ma qal saviour " your financial unbilical chord will be cut" meta jinbidel il- gvern inkella wiehed minn dawk li ta gonzipn jghatuk 50c ta kull post fuq il-bloggs!! U jekk tahseb li b'dak li qed tikteb ser timpressjona lill xi hadd sejjer zball, il-bloggs tieghek riciklati, dejjem l- istess, 70s, 80s Mintoff etc etc, u il-faqar li hallejtu intom fis 60s ma issemmieh qatt!! Ma tinbidlu qatt, ghadektghix 40 sena lura bhall ta martinu!!
avatar
Saviour Balzan's open letter gives the impression that he is trying to reinvent the wheel. It shows in no uncertain terms that he is not familiar with the way the public sector works; this lack of knowledge leads him to think that the government is run solely by ministers. It is true that this is the public perception of the way government acts. This perception is not totally wrong and seems to have gained ground from the way the administration functioned during the Mintoff government days. The main difference between a typical nationalist administration and a Mintoff administration is that in the former case top civil servants are expected to submit proposals for their minister's consideration, while in the Mintoff days the civil service had stopped to function as all they were expected to do was simply to put the ministers' directives into practice. The civil service in those days was not only rendered non-poductive but was simply a passive tool to carry out the ministers' directives; and ministers were in turn expected to do nothing else but carry out directives from Castille . This state of affairs culminated in all ministers assuming responsibility for the actions of the administration and heads of departments were thus relieved from any responsibilities. Hence the chaos that regned supreme in those days. Ministers were summoned to Castille, lectured to and instructed what to do. Even these directives weren't always clear to ministers as many times they only wondered what they were supposed to do and used to spend time analysing the verbal instructions they were given. Everybody kept their own notes; so it was a matter of interpretation.. Directives were several times given to individuals in particular departments during meetings which were not attended by the head of those departments as they were not even asked to attend; so the heads themselves were many times not even aware of what was going on. Obviously this bypassing led to a lot of confusion because the right hand was not aware of what the left hand was doing or was supposed to do. Directives were at times not acted upon for fear that heads would not be following them. Several heads of departments were in limbo as they were left out of things either because they were peceived as saboteurs or because they were not asked to attend meetings for other reasons.. The conclusion by several members of the top echelons of the civil service was to keep a low profile. They felt relieved that they were not summoned to Castille. One can't blame them as it wasn't particularly pleasant to be called to attend a meeting and being shouted at, told you were a fool, and showered with all sorts of praises in front of some twenty people sitting round a conference table. It frequently happened that heads of department weren't even sure of their position after undergoing this treatment; some used to feel that their services had been terminated and that they were not expected to report for work the following day. Thank goodness this all changed post 1987 including the two years of the Sant government. But it seems that the perception of the public at large is still that government is run solely by politicians and that top civil servants don't play an active part in what goes on. Ministers are advised by civil servants and their actions reflect the ideas of their advisors. Except for the 1970s and 80s, it has always been like that. One of the successess of successive nationalist administrations is due to their relaxed form of governance. Not much progress was achieved by lengthening the arrm of government; the less government there is the better for the functioning of the private sector. Stifling of the private sector is a sure way to economic stagnation. The function of governance is the creation of a favourable economic climate leaving the rest to be done by the private sector.
avatar
SAVIOUR IN YOUR OWN WORDS "But as you look at these points, I am sure you are still wondering whether it is possible to get to Castille in the first place. On a personal level, you are more liberal than the present Prime Minister, give credence to that label and use that new symbol to promote a cultural change in a society overtaken by the supremacy of the Church and dominated by the networking ‘mafia’." COMMENT: The first thing the PL must be looking at should be a new draft of the Maltese Constitution. None of your suggestions can be implimented unless there is a change in a new Constitution that protects it's citizens rather than it's government. The new draft must not declare what the government can do to the state and it's citizens, but rather what the government cannot do against it's own people. Unfortunately all the changes that you are suggesting would be very hard to accomplish as every executive branch of this administration including the judiciary are overun with collusion, corruption and organised crime. They will resist any means that will try to take away their theocracy powers and rest assured Malta will be back to the days of cowboy diplomacy and terrorists actions. Fascism has no shame and they will resort to anything to disrupt the changes that can expose their abuse of power and their collusion in dismantling state assets for the benefits of the chosen priviledged insiders. The financial state of Malta has yet to be audited and God only knows how a new administration would be able to cope with such a mess. This next coming election will be a true test to the people of Malta and democracy. The PL must not repeat their incompetence in safe guarding a fair election.
avatar
My DNA is left, no matter what people say, history will show that Malta had only one leader worthy of the name: Dom Mintoff. My vote will always be Labour. Having said that I do not indentify myself with this Labour Party. It behooves me to say that I agree with Saviour, Joseph Muscat is in fisherman's terms trawling. I do not know what Labour is anymore . It irks me that today it is taboo to label labour as left or, God forbid, anyone should say that the Party is socialist. That is why I do not feel as one of the Party because I am left and I am a socialist. Those are my core values and won't betray them for anything! So what? we will stay another 50 years in opposition. Maybe times have changed Saviour but the moronic element of the Party has been its ruin. Given the option to choose between Alfred Sant and Lino Spiteri the Labour morons prefered the former. It was then the Party started its de profundis.
avatar
@Observer Such a long list to begin with... Well there is much to clean up after 25 years of corruption and favoritism from a party who has been in power so long they think they are Olympian gods...
avatar
Belinda Huckson
Such a long list to begin with Are you sure that the right perfect people for the tasks you mentioned can be found? How can you be sure that the networking mafia is composed of only nationalists? How can you change old Pl supporters in the police force as a decent corps? Are you proposing to take the place of Edgar Galea Curmi and Gordon Pisani? So many other questions, Government has phases of development with humans as tools. It is not like mixing a pudding with suggested ingredients. Above all the superman must be up to standard.
avatar
Excellent analysis! Has anyone read this about Galea Curmi's machinations? http://mazzun.wordpress.com/2011/08/17/ir-renju-ta-galea-curmi/
avatar
Good one Saviour, I think Joseph Muscat as prim minister will not only do what you have suggested but even more.One thing you have forgotten to add to your list is that once he is the head of a new government he should establish an inquiry into how and where our finances where allocated, and any wrong doing or mismanagement punished by imprisonment and confiscation of assets.
avatar
SPOT ON!!