Walls, Settlements and Ethnic Cleansing

This blog comes from Nablus in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. There are breathtaking views from the top of the Beit Wazan hills. 

Yet the rugged terrain and garigue, so typical of the Mediterranean landscape, are scarred by the crushing sprawl of new Jewish settlements in the surrounding area. Militant orthodox Jews set up home here. Unlike the typical settlements which exist all over the Occupied Territories, here settlers control parts of the valleys and they are slowly but steadily besieging the Nablusi in the middle.

Typical Jewish settlements first appear when caravans are strategically placed on hill tops. These then turn into building sites that spread on the hillsides displacing Palestinians and usurping their land. In their effort, settlers are supported by the state. The Israeli author Tikva Honig-Parnass aptly observed how in the past 60 years Jewish Zionist politics treated Palestinians like an “environmental nuisance” that needs to be swept away. Other Israeli activists have commented on efforts to remove inconvenient Arab residents since the advent of the infamous Nakba of 1948.

 Brutal ethnic cleansing takes place on a daily basis as expounded by scholar Ilan Pappe’. In the past days we have heard of such cleansing efforts in the northern town of Yanun and some other towns and villages where residents are offering resistance to new settlements. There settler harass Palestinians on a daily basis; Israeli soldiers close off the area without any warning; land is systematically confiscated denying farmers of their olive groves and access to water tanks. Away from the glare of the television cameras and the attention of global news media, there exist silent but resilient struggles by villagers in most areas of Palestine.

Take the village of Yasir Az-Zarka, which I visited only yesterday. It is adjacent to an Israeli municipality which boasts the oldest Jewish settlements that were sponsored by Baron Rothschild in the 1880s. Zarka is the last remaining Palestinian village on the shores of the Mediterranean, apart from those that are confined within the Strip of Gaza.

Try to look up Zarka on a map or try to look for road signs and you will hardly find any indication. Ask for directions to Israelis inhabiting the affluent clusters, whose comfortable homes are coloured bybougainvillea creepers just outside the historical park of Caesarea.  You immediately realize they hardly have a clue Zarka exists as these Israelis exist on a different plane from the Bedouins that inhabit Zarka. There you can walk the unpaved road in the midst of decrepit Palestinian houses; men idling their lives away in open tea shops because there is no economic activity whatsoever. Children learning from the street what they may never learn at school. They look at our Jerusalem-registered car with suspicion.

I was told that there were recent riots in Zarka; the authorities disconnected the water supply as the inhabitants cannot afford to meet the bills. I saw generations of villagers that were being pushed, squeezed, isolated and punished for one unpardonable crime: They are resisting dislocation.

No wonder that the Jewish settlements are the biggest bone of contention in the Middle East peace process. And since the settlements are growing with the blessing of the Israeli government, no wonder that the Palestinians have come to believe that peace talks are mere delaying tactics to keep depriving them of their rights.

I reached the city of Nablus merely two days before Mahmoud Abbas addressed the United Nations General Assembly to demand full Palestinian membership of the United Nations. Palestinians aspirations had been immediately frustrated by Barack Obama’s opposition and by declarations issued by the Quartet that peace negotiations should resume as soon as possible. Israel immediately responded with a provocation: the construction of a new 1, 200 Jewish dwellings in the Palestinian East Jerusalem.

I joined the crowds that gathered in Nablus’s dawwara on the evening of September 23. I went with a new friend whose love for her people is truly inspiring. That day the city centre was packed with families: men, women, youth and kids. The international media were somehow anticipating uprisings but this was an entirely peaceful festival that celebrated Palestinian culture. The music stopped just when Mahmoud Abbas was about to deliver his speech, which was screened for the benefit of the crowd attending the rally. As soon as he commenced, the transmission came to a mysterious halt. A voice announced that the television station was being deliberately jammed. People waited patiently until they could resume watching the speech on a foreign station. In the dawwara people applauded Abbas, as did most of the world leaders in New York.

The Palestinian leader delivered a speech that earned him respect and support. During the rally I heard people say that Abbas reminded them of Yasser Arafat’s heyday. But there was also resentment towards Barack Obama, the man who claimed that we should all have the Audacity to Hope; the man who was awarded a premature Nobel Peace Prize mainly on the basis of his promise to deliver peace in the Middle East. “We will never trust the Americans and the Europeans again” one disappointed man told me. While many were angered but not surprised that Israelis responded to Palestinian aspiration with the setting up of new settlements in East Jerusalem, Washington’s response cuts deeper.

Congress has now blocked $200 million of aidto Palestinians. Long are the days since Obama’s Cairo Speechwhere he declared  “Wewill not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own” and his opposition to Jewish settlements. Rife are the rumours that the US president backed down on his Palestinian promises because his arms were twisted by domestic politics. Obama’s bid for a second term in office depends on Jewish support; it is estimated that in the last presidential election he obtained 78% of the US Jewish vote.  

The cut in US aid will have devastating effects on Palestinians as most of this money was being spent on health care and infrastructural projects. Palestine is one of the biggest aid receivers in the world.  External aid makes up a third of the Occupied Territories’ GDP, even though aid has been dwindling in the past years. Some claim that aid fosters dependency but I have met some very enterprising Palestinians who cannot advance merely because of the Occupation. This week the Palestinian Authority published a study on the cost of occupation.  It concluded that in 2010 the total costs imposed by the Israeli occupation amounted to 85% of the total estimated Palestinian GDP. It was stated that if Palestinians were not subject to occupation, their economy would be double the size it is today.Palestinians cannot make their economy work as long as they do not become a sovereign state.

On top of all this, very striking is the apartheid that is forcing Palestinians into poverty and dependency. Striking are the separate roads and The Wallthat separates the West Bank from Israel. Over 20 years ago the world rejoiced with the fall of the Berlin Wall but little did we know that less than two decades later, world leaders would be turning a blind eye to another Wall that confines Palestinians. One can only cross The Wall at checkpoints, so non-Jews need to travel for many hours to merely visit villages on the other side of The Wall that are actually only a few kilometres away from where they live. There are days when the crossings are closed for Palestinians, like last weekend when Jews were busy celebrating their New Year.

Apartheid systems became immediately clear to me as I was being driven by one of the underemployed youths of East Jerusalem. He has post-graduate qualifications from a prestigious international university; yet in spite of his credentials there are very few work opportunities for intelligent young people like him so he is now resigned to earn a living driving. Israeli occupation is pushing one fourth of the Palestinians into such underemployment. These are luckier than the other one fourth of the Palestinians who are unemployed and the one-third of all Palestinians who are living in poverty, as reported earlier this month by Oxfam.

I have to acknowledge that I did not really know what to expect when I decided to head towards the Occupied Palestinian Territories. My perceptions of the region where shaped by years reading about the human tragedies and the myriad political failure that afflict the region. My family resented this trip. Most of my friends responded with calculated hesitation. I arrived with little knowledge of what is happening on the ground but it did not take me long to gain a deeper understanding. People on the street are very conscious of what is being played in the world of High Politics; nonetheless most of them only wish to lead a normal life where they have jobs, they feel secure and they can obtain the human dignity and rights that are only afforded by citizens of nation states.

Last week I stood in an open ground in front of the Palestinian Authority’s headquarters in Ramallah. There the Maltese flag was among those of all the nations supporting Palestinian statehood. Malta has a moral obligation to speak vociferously and clearly about the Palestinians’ right to sovereignty as we have the responsibility to defend the rights of others. Whereas too many players are gambling the future of Palestinians for their own ends, as a small nation we can maintain our moral ground by standing tall and using a strong voice in the community of nations. 

avatar
@Zammit I agree with you that the American-Jews voters are not exactly the problem and this big votiing block that could sway the results in any way. However the strength behind the control exerted by 'Zionist Jews' in America over the fate of Politicians lies in the financial and coverage backing recieved by those who promote the Israeli agenda. Although the number of American-Jew Voters can be considered insignificant as a voting block, the influence the Israeli Leaders, and those who harbour such ideals, is vast and capable of persuading even the most die-hard and genuine of politicians to bow down to the pressure and concede enormous amounts of cash, and political support, such as using the Veto Power in the UN when discussing or proposing something which Israel Dislikes or would put Israel at a 'disadvantage'.
avatar
@Dr. Sammut I agree, fully, with what Ken has stated, and there is no need to further elaborate on his comments.   I have one point to make: The way you have presented the American-Jewish vote -- 78% of the US Jewish vote -- raises a red flag.    American-Jews count for less than 3% of the US population, therefore, 78% of less than 3% equals to about 2.25% of the national vote. That is a statistically insignificant number. Of course, it can be said that, when it is a situation where every vote counts, then it could make a differnece. But so does every other vote.   Presenting American-Jewish voters as some unbeatable voting block wielding power, is to say the least, flawed thinking.   The Palestinians' problem is not Israel, or the settlements; it's their corrupt leaders. You may want to do some research on that.
avatar
John Mifsud
The Palestianian Authority does not fulfil the basic requirements of statehood under international law, and cannot fulfil the duties required of a UN member state. It does not even have effective control of its 'territory' .Full stop. No amount of wishful thinking and platitudes can change the basic facts of life. On another level, Malta would be very ill-advised to continue in the role of the Palestinians' lackey. The debacle of the bipartisan policy with respect to the Gaddafi regime in Libya should serve as ample warning.
avatar
@Ken. You should look up the meaning of "credibility".... You attack the journalist simply because she is saying the truth. What is not credible is Israel and its partner in crime, the US. Obama has shown his true colours - just like any other other US president he is there to do Israel's bidding.
avatar
@ Ken Pls calm down. the "bone of contention' are the mushrooming settlements by Izraelis on Palestinian land. What about it?
avatar
Ms Sammut..you have twisted my meaning; not "How dare you write an opinion piece" but rather how dare you misappropriate the words "ethnic cleansing" and "apartheid" which are gross exaggerations when used about Israel. Yes, I know, Israeli leftists have used the "Israeli apartheid" misnomer too...but the difference is that THEY still believe that Israel should have a right to exist; most of those using the term today do not. Secondly, you didn't answer my main point: you talk about the Palestinians, but you CONVENIENTLY refused to mention HAMAS. You mentioned Abbas' speech from the UN suddenly being "cut off" in Nablus; but a GOOD journalist would have taken the time to find out if it was the Israelis or Hamas who did the censoring. Your piece suggested it is Israel. Where's your proof? Considering the fact that Hamas was totally against Abbas going to the UN to ask for unilateral Statehood in the first place, and considering the fact that Hamas was censoring Abbas' speech in the UN in Gaza, it seems MORE likely that the program was cut in Nablus by Hamas rather than by the Israelis. Your "How can those who suffered a Holocaust cause so much suffering for others who want statehood" is risible; The Palestinians HAD a State offered to them in 1948. It was larger than the one offered Israel, and was offered at the same time. They refused, because they wanted it ALL! They and the Arab States have already fought 4 wars to try and make sure that Israel be completely destroyed. Have you forgotten this "minor" detail? What makes you think that they don't STILL want it all? Hamas and Hezbollah certainly do! And while Israel gives away all its bargaining chips AND its security by following YOUR suggestions, who is going to stop Hamas and Hezbolllah from finishing what Hitler started? You? Abbas? The European Union, which couldn't stop the REAL genocide in Serbia? I'm sorry, but your concern for Palestinians (though valid in and of itself... I agree that they should have a State!) keeps pointing fingers in only one direction. That is doing no one any good. Let Abbas deal EFFECTIVELY with Hamas and Hezbollah, so that they are no longer a threat to Israel's existence, and THEN Israel might be more willing to discuss REASONABLE terms. Until then, it isn't likely. Hamas and Hezbollah are the elephant in the room on the Palestinian side ; you have preferred to ignore them, which makes the credibility of your piece suffer.
avatar
Mind you, not all Palestinians resort to such tactics, I don't want to be mistunderstood as saying that they are all terrorists. Neither are the Israeli Civilians all part of this Ethnic Cleansing... Most are just simple people who do not know of the oppression taking place just around the corner...
avatar
http://www.occupation101.com/ This is a documentary that clearly defines and outlines the points you mention in your article. As regards to who is the Evil side... quite frankly, the Israeli Government is no saint, and is really pushing and squeezing the life out of the Palestinians... While the Palestinians, having lost all hope and no organized military of any sort, resort to the only possible way to have their voice heard... i.e. terrorism... As one Palestinian which was interviewed in the above mentioned documentary said... 'Israel will not send Suicide Bombers... They have tanks, jets and helicopters. Why would they send someone to die like that?'
avatar
My pleasure, Ms Sammut
avatar
Liliana Camilleri
To Mr Ken, I truly appreciate your very OBJECTIVE response to my article. How dare I write this opinion piece? Because I am luckier than Palestinians: I am a citizen of a nation state where Freedom of Expression, is a right. But please do not detract my argument. My main point is that unless Palestine becomes a sovereign state, its people cannot aspire to achieve political democratization and economic development. Hardline politics, walls and above all the settlements (and consequent dislocation) are causing further frustration and will stir further radicalization. About a month ago I visited the camps of Auchwitz and Birkenau. As I wrote in a previous blog, this was a life affirming visit and an eye opener on the dangers of racism and ethnocentrism. See http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/food_travel/travel/a-flight-to-popeland In those concentration camps where million of Jews were brutally exterminated, I kept asking myself: How can those who suffered such a horrible holocaust live with a situation where their neighbours are subjected to all this suffering? To Il Googol - thanks for pointing out the typo
avatar
How dare you talk about "ethnic cleansing" and yet, in the entire article, the word "HAMAS" was never once mentioned? You are sorely misinformed, or biased, or both, Ms Sammut. Hamas was so against Abbas's speech at the U.N. that they refused to let people watch it, turning off the tv's if the Palestinians in Gaza applauded him. Hamas has written into their Charter that they intend to kill Jews - not Israelis, Ms Sammut, but Jews - ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD! And this is exactly what Palestinians have done for 50 years - preferably targeting citizens, whether in Paris restaurants or on Italian cruise ships (where they shot a Jewish man in a wheelchair dead, then pushed him overboard - still in his chair!). Purposely attacking civilians (specifically women and children) - on buses, in discotheques - or shelling settlements in Israel with rockets , (not in the territories, please note!) for ten years - is a recognized war crime! Oh, and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (look it up on Google!) are taught in Palestinian schools as if they were fact. They were a hoax first used by the Russian Czars as an excuse to attack Jews during the Pogroms - a REAL case of ethnic cleansing! Then Hitler used the Protocols in Mein Kampf to excuse HIS ethnic cleaning of Jews. Now the Palestinians are teaching their children the same LIES. Egypt made a six-part television series on the Protocols - broadcast across the entire Middle East. The Protocols is the most anti-Semitic document of the entire 20th century - but Ms Sammut dares to talk about "ethnic cleansing" ? And she goes further, borrowing the word "apartheid" to discuss Israel too. Is Ms Sammut aware of the fact that Israel for years gave Palestinian gay children from the West Bank and Gaza refuge - even though they could have been spies? Gay Palestinians are in danger of imprisonment, torture and possibly murder - often by their own families! - but Israel gives them refuge... does this sound like "apartheid" to you? Strange that you mention The Wall, yet never bother to explain WHY the wall was built in the first place. It was built to stop terrorist attacks on CIVILIANS inside Israel proper - suicide bombers were attacking busloads full of women and children.... Since the building of the wall,there has been ONE terrorist attack whereas there were dozens and dozens before; in other words, The Wall was necessary! I agree, Ms Sammut, that the Wall should have been built entirely on Israeli territory instead of sometimes encroaching on Palestinian land - but every country has a right to defend its citizens. The Wall was a direct response to suicide terrorist attacks. Were you writing articles against Palestinian terrorism before the Wall was built Ms Sammut? I doubt it; your entire article is one-sided. Articles like this will do nothing to explain the complexities of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Articles like this will only guarantee that the stalemate continue. Because if you have to base your article on LIES and MISINFORMATION, then the Israelis will continue to dig into their trenches even further. They already KNOW what "ethnic cleansing" REALLY is, Ms Sammut - most of them lost family to the Holocaust. They are not about to sit back and let Hamas and Hezbollah, and biased journalists like yourself - set up the conditions for another one! Israel has many bad policies, Ms Sammut - as do the Palestinians! When you are ready to write a FAIR article, let us know. In the meantime, go Google the Protocols. And read the Hamas Charter while you are at it. You seriously need to do some research before you start using terminology that is inappropriate. I repeat: how dare you?
avatar
the word is "cleansing" not "cleaning"