Commemorating our failures

25 years ago in Gudja, Raymond Caruana was shot dead. That episode should have led to a landslide victory for the Nationalist party in the 1987 election. It did not.

It was simple a 4,000 vote difference.

The PN had a marginal advantage which many had expected to be far bigger.

With all the talk of corruption and violence, most Maltese were more interested in retaining the status quo. Thanks, of course, to all the favour and considerate electoral pledges before May 1997. The same electoral ploy is repeated every five years.

In reality, to avoid losing their hold on power, the Labour opposition at the time did everything possible to retain their supremacy.

Just in the same way the Nationalists are doing now.

There is not much of a difference in the tactics applied then and the ones applied now.

Jobs for the boys, contracts for the boys and pjaciri for the boys.

There are of course no sub-machines being fired at people, no cars being burnt and no police thugs taking orders from Ministers on VHF radio.

But we do have institutional fatigue and a serious democratic deficit.

By this I mean a weak judiciary, dependant on the political class, and multiple boards with no teeth to bite and appointments linked to political lineage rather than meritocracy, and a TVM which is throwback to Remig Sacco's days.

But the rules of the engagement are very much the same.

Raymond Caruana was a very ugly episode.

It led to people such as myself - who were intrinsically suspicious of the Nationalists - to abandon any consideration for Labour and to drift slowly towards the PN.

At the age of 23, I even toyed with the idea of leaving the country, and never coming back.

The worst thing about Raymond Caruana was not the crime in itself,  which was abominable, but the fact that police chose to frame someone else, someone innocent.

This leads me to think that the police knew who killed Raymond Caruana. How else would they have planted the gun that shot him in Pietru Pawl Busuttil's farmhouse?

As if it was not quite bad enough to murder an innocent 26-year-old, the idea of a frame up was far more sinister.

The men who were behind the frame up must surely have known what happened when the shooting took place at Gudja.

Raymond Caruana is one of several incidents which remain unsolved.

But there are other incidents or episodes which were never solved.

The officers and the individuals who were left off the hook not only got on with their lives but also were effectively promoted in the police corps.

The same police who were there then are here now. And they have been promoted by the same people who have cried wolf for the past 25 years.

Those that did have only the Nationalists to thank, not the Nationalists who were at barricades getting gassed, but the poseurs who ended up as ministers and preached the art of compromise.

In the end, that compromise benefited the perpetrators no one else.

There were other incidents not involving the police - the cases of extensive corruption highlighted by individuals such as Wenzu Mintoff and Toni Abela - ironically portrayed as 'old Labour' by the spin machine - were used in the campaigns but conveniently forgotten by the justice system.

For standing up, they were kicked out of the Labour party. Now that they have returned to the PL, they are depicted as old Labour. 

Indeed many of the top senior managers at Mid Med (many of whom were Nationalist-leaning) who were definitely involved in that bank's corruption scandal were retained by the government-owned bank and promoted.

The people who decided all those were not the Chief messengers, nor the yes men or the chauffeurs. They were the ministers and the Prime Minister... in other words, Eddie Fenech Adami and Guido de Marco.

Judge Anastasi, who compiled an extensive report on the subject of Mid-Med, never lived to see justice done.

I thought later on that many of the Fenech Adami and de Marco decisions were motivated by the politics of reconciliation. That reconciliation turned out to be a big hollow promise.

Because every time Eddie Fenech Adami or Guido de Marco were in a corner, they would automatically revert to these issues to score political points.

Over the past 25 years, governance has been dominated by a resurgence of Mintoffianism with great finesse.

Not only have people been appointed because of their political colour but more importantly, because of the obligations that occur within the political Masonic system.

But back to Raymond Caruana.

Raymond Caruana's case remained unsolved.

If there is someone to blame for this case not being solved, surely they are to be found among the police and the executive?

It is rather strange that none of the political murders remain unsolved.

Lino Cauchi and Raymond Caruana remain unsolved murders. To go on commemorating anniversaries without having offered solutions to institutional reform goes to prove that many of the anniversary crap is there to pump up adrenaline into the janissaries who remain faithful to a political party, irrespective of whether a party has forgotten from where it is coming, and where it is going.

When, in the late 80s, I campaigned to have Lorry Sant arraigned and investigated for corruption and violence, the administration of the day was shockingly lethargic.

Nothing happened. 

I spent my early days in journalism spouting stories about the corruption in Labour before 1987. 

It suddenly dawned on me that while I was trying to catch up with the past, I was missing out on the present. Slowly, the same mistakes of the past were repeating themselves.

A repeat of Raymond Caruana will not and should never happen, but the symptoms of the political bigotry and hate that existed then, exists now, perhaps not as loud and vulgar, but nonetheless it does exist.

Instead of looking back for the umpteenth time, we should look to the future and start mapping out what needs to be done for our future generations.

 

 

avatar
Abdullah alhrbi
I fully agree with Michael. As I have said before you should really look at what Eddiesm,Gattism, RCCism, Salibaism and latterly Gonzism and Galea Curmiism have actually translated into. The real disservice to the Maltese nation lies in the inability of those who should know better to bring about true reconciliation by setting up a proper Truth and Reconciliation commission. Perhaps then the nation can truly move forward without political division organising the day from dawn till dusk. There is no politician yet who has had the courage to go for this. It seems cowardice is the shield of political and moral bankruptcy.
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
Well Said Giordano Bruno. But I think, for fairness sake, Saviour is trying hard to be fair. Sometimes he succeeds, but sometimes the abhorrence of what happened in the early 80's overwhelm him! Of course, these sermons, will always be heard every late november, early December. It's the PN's Christmas wishes and gifts of divide and conquer. We still have a long way to go to become one nation!
avatar
Do not worry I will take no offence if you do not publish it. I am positive you will not But I had to react: 1: The death of Raymond Caruana was a very tragic accident. It was not a political murder. If you believe it was politically motivated prove it. I do not know, whether our justice system is incompetent or not. Was this incompetence just a ruse? Could be 2: The frame of P.P Bustill illustrates that the Labour Party was being lead a merry go round by the police force. You yourself state that those who cooked everything no only stayed on but were promoted. Of course those who were Labour were kicked out, and rughtly so. It was only when Alfred Sant made that brief interlude that a couple of the police top brass connected with those incident were releaved of their jobs. 3.You mentioned hate and rancor still exist. Certainly they do, more so, when pundits like you who claim to be neutral in your commentary, forget to mention Karin Grech. Tell us Saviour why did Karen die, maybe because she like playing with bombs? Was hers a political murder or not? Fenech Adami said that he knew the culprit. Did he really? Where is this culprit know? 4. The trouble with you Saviour is that you condence the whole Labour Administration in its last three years. You know very well that Labour governed Malta give and take 18 - 19. From 1955-58 and 1971-87. In those years history will tells that Labour, yes lead by Mintoff instituted the basic infrastructure of a modern country. Who estabilshed the welfare state with the opposition of the PN and the Church? Let us see, free education, free health, social housing, Air Malta, Sea Malta and other parastatal entities. In this respect when Mintoff gave children's allowance he did not look at the political allegiance or if the parents sent their children to a private a govt. schools. When he gave the stipends to students he gave to all. Those from Sliema and those from Cottonera. 5. That is why you are unfair a biased because albeit the many mortal sins, you assiduously and intentionallt forget how the Labour Administration cared about the Maltese people. Such things are conveniently forgotten because comparins are odeous. You see the dictator Mintoff together with Lorry Sant Before I continue I beseech you let this person rest in peace, at least for the sake of his family. Those who left for a better life our thoughts of then should always be positive. Anything is for God to decide. The name Lorry Sant has become synonimous with ganster. This is unethical, immoral and that our core values leave much to be desired. R.I.P Lorry. These two would not squander millions on a white elephant like the Bieb il-Belt Project or to set uo the mother of all pantomines Arriva. 6. I would be dellusional to affirm that there was no corruption during the Labour Administration. Sure their was. I will not even use the lame excuse that if no proof was found there was no corruption. I abide with the Italian saying 'Non c e' fumo senza arrosto'. The difference is that during that corrupt government the family had a good standard of living. No body was moving towards poverty. And with all that corruption Mintoff never had the gall to give himself and his henchnan a 500 Euros a week pay hike.
avatar
Jurgen Cachia
Saviour, you may remember that I was one of the few who did stick my neck out in the last years of the Labour Government, when I publicly supported the MUT's strike (and unlike you I did leave the country :) ) It was and remains right to denounce the criminal excesses of Labour in the latter half of its period in government. But describing all that goes wrong to this day as Mintoffianism is incorrect. There was much more to Labour, and arguably most that was good up to 1987 was also due to Labour. Need I remind you, too, that both the major parties have a long history, stretching back to the early 20th century: much of Labour's was praiseworthy, much of the PN's disgusting. So please, how about putting more thought in the historical assessment?
avatar
The PN never had a strong will to solve these and any other political murders that took place in the 70s and 80s. The reasons might be various. I, for one, like to believe what a good ex pn high ranking activist once told me about this issue. The PN always gained tremendous political mileage from the fact that no closure has ever been found to this social wound. And, in the unlikely eventuality that one day these murders are solved or almost, this will not be thanks to the PN.
avatar
Saviour, when you feel an unusual impulse to be sincere, you will tell your readers that you regularly attacked Labour until the day that ĦuBastjan lost the PN leadership contest.