Invisible people

The TV station formerly known as ‘Xandir Malta’ celebrated its 50th anniversary without a single mention or a single image of virtually any of the people who contributed (regardless how, or to what effect) to that same station’s development over the same 50 years.

Spot the difference...
Spot the difference...

There was a documentary on Discovery not long ago - I imagine it is now available on YouTube, but sadly I've forgotten the title - about the curiously consistent habit of dictatorial regimes to 'doctor' photos (and video footage, where available) in order to 'remove' various undesirables from public view.

As I recall Josef Stalin was by far the most regular item on the menu: largely thanks to his penchant for suddenly declaring former allies and comrades as 'enemies of the state'... and, having duly liquidated the individual/s concerned, the logical next step was obviously to remove all documentary evidence that they had ever existed.

Not all cases were quite as sinister, however. One example that stuck in my mind was a rather famous photograph of a sword-wielding Benito Mussolini striking a distinctly Napoleonic pose on horseback. In the best-known version of that photo, which I even remember from our history textbooks at school, Il Duce himself was the only human figure visible. We now know, however, that the original photograph also featured a second human subject: the horse had to be held in check by a horse-handler while the photo was being taken.

Looked back on today, it seems a rather laughable exercise in political megalomania: but you can still more or less appreciate the strategy at work. After all, 'great leaders' should be obeyed and revered by all and sundry... and that presumably includes their horses as well. It wouldn't do, Mussolini's propagandists reasoned, to project the image of the Great Duce needing someone else to keep his horse still. It might conceivably impart the notion that Benito himself was somewhat less than superhuman - unable to bend even such a lowly equestrian brain to his own iron will - and as that was naturally unthinkable, the horse-boy had to go.

Well, Mussolini, Stalin et al were by no means the only people we know to have resorted to such elaborate pre-Photoshop techniques to make sure their version of history got into the history books. Even here in Malta we have witnessed our own fair share of celluloid 'disappearances' over the years... and some bore a remarkable resemblance to the Mussolini method.

The most widely cited example remains to this day the 1980s Xandir Malta policy of reducing Eddie Fenech Adami to nothing more than a nameless, shadowy figure referred to only as 'Il-Kap tal-Oppozizzjoni'. And at roughly the same time (though this was not quite as immediately evident) the map of the world behind the newscaster was also 'doctored': this time it was Great Britain, no less, that was temporarily removed from the picture altogether.

In any case: times change, governments fall and are replaced... but the same strategy has been upheld throughout. A much more recent example was a 2003 NET TV report, ostensibly about MEUSAC's pre-referendum consultation with civil society, in which the video footage was crudely edited to remove AD chairman Harry Vassallo from all the frames.

Curiously, for a political party that had deplored an identical tactic when used against its own leader, the PN had clearly instructed its media to pursue Benito's policy of removing from the picture anything that might reduce his own importance in the grander scheme of things. So in the run-up to the 2004 election, Harry Vassallo became a 'non-person' (not perhaps in the Stalinist sense of the word, but certainly in the horse-boy sense) at the helm of a 'non-party'.

And sure enough the same technique rears its decidedly ugly head today. Only this time, the irony is of truly monumental proportions. Remember the TV station formerly known as 'Xandir Malta' - that's right, the very same that had once censored Fenech Adami's name altogether, and had even tried to rewrite European geography to suit the propaganda purposes of the government that controlled it at the time? Well, it has just celebrated its 50th anniversary... without a single mention or a single image of virtually any of the people who contributed (regardless how, or to what effect) to that same station's development over the same 50 years.

Norman Hamilton, Josette Grech (now also Hamilton), Joe Vella, Mario Micallef, Charles Flores... these are but a few of today's 'non-people' as far as the controllers of Malta's national station are concerned. Not only were they omitted from the guest-list of Xandir Malta's 50th anniversary celebrations (the Hamiltons' being arguably the most glaring omissions here... having been part of the furniture at the same Television House, Gwardamangia, for nearly half that station's existence), but they were studiously omitted even from the video installations projected onto the building's façade to commemorate the occasion.

What all these cases have in common is a very simple equation that lies at the heart of all political propaganda. Benito Mussolini felt that 'a true picture' of events would be to his disadvantage... so he simply presented a fake one instead. Around 70- years later, the Nationalist Party clearly feels a true picture of TVM's chequered history would undermine its own influence - presumably by reminding  people that there was a time, long ago, when the PN did not actually control everything at all - and just like all the little tin-pot dictators this little planet of ours has ever seen, today's government felt its own short-term self-interest was of far greater importance than the truth.

The exact same equation applied equally to the 1980s Mintoff/KMB regime, which had also regularly distorted the true picture in order to achieve its own political aims. So is there any reason under the sun - any reason at all - why it should not also apply to the government led by Lawrence Gonzi... a government that has time and again proved to be simply no better than the people it likes to criticise so much?

I don't think there is a reason myself. So just as the PN has always (quite rightly) demanded apologies over the shameful excesses of Xandir Malta in the 1980s, I for one feel that an apology is now in order for the same stations' shoddy distortion of its own recent history. And it's not just the Hamiltons, the Vellas, the Micallefs, et al, who deserve an apology, either.

It's also to us, the prime shareholders in a national station that has now officially gone all the way back to its darkest days of 'Run Rabbit Run'.

avatar
DARDIR MALTA. This what what the Nationalist called XANDIR MALTA - and its still DARDIR MALTA - even after they rename the Semitic word XANDIR with the english PBS. The problem with both parties is that each time someone sets the precedent for lowering the standards of decency and democracy - the other side uses that standard as the new default to lower even further. Same Scum - Same Country - Two parties!
avatar
Dear Raphael Here is another example of invisible people. How about being called in for a meeting by the scum bags at Austin Gatt's ministry - being asked for a list of your clients quite aggressively. Then later you see a report by the same people saying they have made their investigations and confirm that you don't exist - same report then goes on to make fraudulent claims for EU money to create unfair competition to steal your business. There is a special place in hell for Gonzi and his accomplices. Any comparisons to dictators when discussing Malta are inevitable.
avatar
briffy, wakey wakey! It will be GonziPNisti that will swallow huge doses of Valium next March, when their cosy, make believe world will implode. Dr Franco Debono MP will be honoured by true Nationalists that will consider him as one of the modern day saviours of their party, having battled to cleanse the dregs.
avatar
Xandir Malta = PBS storja ta censura. Hnizirijiet ghadhom isiru, sewwa qal Franco.
avatar
Mary Farrugia
But you are not so bad at "doctoring" either, are you Mr.Vassallo? You deliberately omitted any mention of Joe Grima from your piece, which you wrote after your colleague at Maltatoday lifted Norman Hamilton's complaint from his Facebook. That story reported Joe Grima complaining (on Norm's wall) that he too had not been invited for the commemoration of 50years' of public broadcasting, by PBS. Before he became Minister for Industry and later for Tourism under Labour, Joe Grima had been Head of Programs at Rediffusion House for ten years in the late 1960s. In 1973 he became CEO of the Broadcasting Authority and set up Malta's first independent Radio stations. It was he who gave Norman Hamilton, Josette Grech and yes, Francis Zammit Dimech, among many,many others ,their first break in broadcasting.
avatar
@ Toninu PBS doesn't need to make Franco look ridiculous; indeed Franco doesn't need anybody's help to look ridiculous or rather pathetic. After all, it was Franco who foisted himself on PBS, he wasn't even invited for the debate with Simon. Labour said that Franco pleaded with them to let him replace AF. But people can be be cruel. And the poor man seriously needs help but like anyone who can't see things clearly he is not capable of understanding the situation.
avatar
It is unacceptable the way Tvhemm are trying to ridicule Dr.Franco Debono. Is this the way to celebrate the 50th anniversary of our local National Broadcasting Station? Shame.
avatar
PBS has become the propaganda mill of the PN, the party in power. They will continue to exploit propaganda resources to their own advantage. The power of incumbency is growing ruthless as election day approaches. Democracy in Malta is in peril.
avatar
Frederick Cutajar
@briffy The writer is not comparing the people but the tactics employed in manipulating people's perceptions.
avatar
Well i think the perception is alwaysz that the govermnet controls the national station and personally i think that since the goverment appoints the persons for the top posts some kind of sympathy there will be,luckily today there are people like yourself that they will expose any wrongdoing.Im 33 so i dont remember the 80's but i dont think you can compare those days with today for one simple reason, if something is wrong is exposed in few minutes and scrutinized(by yourself or others)and there will be pressure on those in charge and anger from the public.Im sorry that the people you mentioned were not invited for the cermony i hope that we will have an honest explanation for such thing afterall they are part of the history of the national station.
avatar
Is it fair to have one talk show after an other ,where 'Where is Everybody' ( indeed they are the only ones) who time and again, in their rabidly pro GonziPN political talk shows, set up the frame and insist on it, where the PL spokesman does not control the floor, can't present his case, and is not accorded enough respect to be taken seriously?. We have had enpough of thes fixed games. In football and other sports events fixed games are taken seriously: I wonder why not in the 'national' broadcasting?
avatar
What was considered extreme a few years ago has now become a policy at PBS where millions of euros have been invested in a broadcasting company-made up by a few good Nationalists- to frame and to create a new political narrative in favour of the status quo :GonziPN. This neo-Orwellian age of GonziPN-speak, should be an eye opener for people of good will who have European values of free speech at heart.
avatar
David Bongailas
Excellent piece as usual Mr.Vassallo. And briffy. Gonzi might not have anything in common with the mentioned dictators but the people around him (we all know who they are) would sure make the stalin and mussolini crew blush. Happy new year to all the Mtoday readers!!!
avatar
Joseph Sant
A Happy New Year to Briffy - and thanks for the laugh mate. You really seem to have taken Simon Busuttil's advice to heart and are doing the militancy bit defending the Government at the grocer's! Well done chum. A Happy New year to Rapheal as well. I was one of the invisibles left out of the picture on Friday. But I feel privileged to have been left out. To me it signifies that I don't belong to the class of buffoons and charlatans who now call themselves broadcasters. Phew! what a relief!!
avatar
briffy >> "PLUS ÇA CHANGE, PLUS C'EST LA MÊME CHOSE"!!! However, allow me to wish you a better future for 2013 and beyond.
avatar
I'm sorry Raphael, but I totally disagree with your conclusion that the doings of Gonzi on the one hand, and those of Stalin and Mussolini on the other have anything in common. Your attempt to persuade your readers is utterly futile, simply because there is no likeness at all. What intrigues me however is why you made this attempt at all. The mere fact that you dared to write such an article should make you realise that any likeness between Gonzi and the two dictators is only a figment of your imagination.
avatar
As they say "PLUS ÇA CHANGE, PLUS C'EST LA MÊME CHOSE" and this is to be expected as the persons appointed at the top are always blind supporters of their party of the little islander mentality kind. The only difference is that before we had a raw "Dardir Malta" station which has now turned into a more polished "Ardir Malta" station.
avatar
I have to agree with Franco on this one, when he warned that all the taxpayer owned media were operating at worse levels of decency than Dardir Malta etc ever was. Will Malta ever grow up?