‘Il paese dei balocchi’

In the next weeks Malta will look like a fantastic amusement park where everything is possible. The question is: can all the expectations raised in the campaign be satisfied after March 10?

During the Xmas break my son was addicted to Walt Disney's Pinocchio, which I had to watch around six times.

One striking image of the tale is that of Pleasure Island (in Italian it translates as 'Il paese dei balocchi') where every day is a holiday and wayward boys are allowed to act as they please without recrimination, until the boys are physically transformed into donkeys.

On Sunday I could not believe my eyes reading the news that according to Finance Minister Tonio Fenech there is no cause of concern over rising deficit.

The reality is that official figures have shown that Malta's deficit increased by €64 million compared with last year.

It is true that while expenditure stops at the turn of the year, government revenue continues to flow in for a further couple of months, thus ensuring a lower deficit.  But this is the same every year and the deficit increase was registered over the same period of last year.

Fenech was the same minister who in December presented a budget which includes a concrete measure to reduce the highest tax rate from 35% to 25% over a three-year period.

In the absence of an abnormal rate of economic growth (which is extremely unlikely given the bleak international scenario), this would simply translate in a drop in revenue and therefore, a greater deficit. This is because there is no way on earth through which one can cut expenditure substantially without cutting expenditure on health or education. One can surely cut down on consultancies but the amount saved won't be enough to balance the books.

The risk is that as government revenue falls, the greater the temptation to introduce means tests that would simply mean that the lower middle class would have to pay for services which were previously free - simply because the upper middle class is paying less taxes.

Politically, the budget has spoiled Gonzi's credentials as the voice of fiscal sobriety, that 'safe pair of hands' which saved the country from the worst ravages of the greatest global crisis since the Great Depression of the 1920s.

One reason for this was the government's reliance on local loans and Malta's inward looking banking system. But fiscal prudence since we joined the euro was also an important factor in keeping the storm away. So was the wise decision not to enact the tax cuts and to spend money in helping factories, which were at risk of closing down. 

Incredibly back then Joseph Muscat was calling on Gonzi to honour his pre-electoral tax pledge, ignoring the fact that Lehman Brothers had just collapsed after March 2008.

But now the same Gonzi who called for prudence and who always insisted that Malta is not immune to international factors, is now giving the impression that we are having it so good that we can even have it better. 

This could ultimately be Gonzi's greatest strategic mistake. For by giving this impression he is lending credence to Joseph Muscat's simplistic promise that under a Labour government, everyone will have more money in his or her pockets.

People will ask: if we are one of the few countries in Europe who can afford tax cuts for the richest categories, why should we not afford cutting utility bills for all and sundry?

Labour has already neutralised the political impact of the budget by endorsing it. But by doing so it has also practically neutered itself and has been put in a position where it is unable to raise doubts on its sustainability.

Moreover, if Labour puts the sustainability of public finances in doubt, voters will also question its commitment to reduce utility bills, especially if this includes a shortfall in government revenue.

My fear is that over the next two months the country will increasingly look like a giant amusement park where politicians will raise expectations beyond what the country will offer. 

The next government will either have to recant its promises, or embark on an even more dangerous path of promoting economic growth at any cost, a short-term approach which could come at very serious environmental and social costs.

For a reality check I recommend switching on to the Italian election, where with the exception of a Berlusconi, nobody is promising tax cuts or lower bills...

avatar
Luke Camilleri
Int jonqos f' ‘Il paese dei balocchi’ Sur James Debono ,..... bhal Jack in the Box, jiftahlek l'ghatu u taqbez!
avatar
fenea kindly understand that paying 0% is always better than even 15% or 25% or even 35%!! So unless there is a fail-safe system of tax collection and declarations, it will simply revert to the present status quo. Those that cannot avoid it, will pay it; others that have the means to avoid it will not. I do not mean just the self employed, but also the public sector's fully expensed (but very lightly taxed) cars, lavish travel perks (on work duties ??), chauffeurs and messengers galore and other (again work related???) allowances that remain untaxed. The only good system I can envisage is having as little Government involvement as necessary. This will vastly reduce waste and hence the need to collect as many different taxes as at present.
avatar
james ghandek zball kull darba li il gvern naqqas ir rata tat taxxi dejjem dahhal aktar revenue. GHALA? ghax bniedem li jkollu ir rata tat taxxa imnaqqsa tistimulah li jahdem aktar allura jaqla aktar, ihallas aktar taxxa, jofoq aktar u jhallas vat aktar.
avatar
james ghandek zball kull darba li il gvern naqqas ir rata tat taxxi dejjem dahhal aktar revenue. GHALA? ghax bniedem li jkollu ir rata tat taxxa imnaqqsa tistimulah li jahdem aktar allura jaqla aktar, ihallas aktar taxxa, jofoq aktar u jhallas vat aktar.
avatar
I have not always subscribed to your point of view James but I must commend you for being the only writer who has shed light on the deficit across the web. In my opinion the deficit is the most worrying of problems facing our country and it will take more then a decade for the country to have reasonable levels of debt. GonziPN has been a failure point blank and the figures are there to prove it. The PL have been mainly silent on our debt and I wonder if they are capable of managing it for the better once in Govt. however on the results obtained I feel the PN should not get the chance of fixing it.
avatar
James, I understand your position with regards to the new Tax rates. However if you have some time see the following theory (link below) which explains why it may not be a bad idea after all. The main points are that if these middle to high earners spend more there will be a positive momentum through VAT, better corporate revenues (hence more tax from companies at 35%) and even better economic growth. Also many people may not risk or reduce tax evasion with these better rates since there is less need to evade but still the same high penalties and persecution. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/laffercurve.asp#axzz2GwV94Of0
avatar
James, I understand your position with regards to the new Tax rates. However if you have some time see the following theory (link below) which explains why it may not be a bad idea after all. The main points are that if these middle to high earners spend more there will be a positive momentum through VAT, better corporate revenues (hence more tax from companies at 35%) and even better economic growth. Also many people may not risk or reduce tax evasion with these better rates since there is less need to evade but still the same high penalties and persecution. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/laffercurve.asp#axzz2GwV94Of0
avatar
Unfortunately there are a number of economic issues which our political parties have rendered themselves powerless and incapable of tackling because they require a bipartisan sense of national economic responsibility and responsible budgeting. In the process we have created a raft of unsustainable social handouts to all and sundry and now worse still regressive fiscal legislation which is socially blatantly unjust. Measures such as free health for all, stipends for all, tax cuts for the rich, subsidized energy cuts for all are simply economic madness which we will eventually have to recant on when we create our own Dingli fiscal cliff drop. The EU is now thankfully imposing overall oversight on the budget and this will eventually lead to stringent cuts being forced upon us worse than last year's 40 million budget cut request. We are not a rich country and unless there is an unlikely sudden increase in revenue by striking oil we cannot hand out what richer countries than us cannot afford. Let us trust that when we approach the economic chasm it will not be ,as is currently the trend, that the weakest and poorest segment of our society which will be the ones who bear the brunt and suffer. There was a time when the former independent governor of the central bank used to issue warnings on irresponsible profligacy with the public purse. The present governor given his political background has kept mum on unsustainable public purse disbursements. It is time we had a court of economic auditors who would vet public purse budgetary projected figures at the micro and allocation level to ensure their correctness and express clearly their social implications on our society.
avatar
Aha! You see James, saying it like it is is hugely liberating for the soul.
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
Joseph Muscat didn't say that he'll implement all the measures in the budget. He said that he'll keep the main frame of the budget, but with some changes!