Truth is in the eye of the beholder
Do we really want an authority, whether Facebook or someone else, that controls what is shared and posted? It’s not like the truth has any chance
Media has played a central role in my life. I’ve worked in different newsrooms and as a politician, I’ve also been on the other side of it. The rules were simple. The game was simple. A journalist gets a lead and works on the story.
The other side have their say and the public reach their own conclusion. The injection of technology and social media has changed the rules. It has widened the space so much that the timeline of a story is completely twisted, and it is pushed and pulled by the content created in parallel with the story.
On February 14, a gunman opened fire at Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida. 14 died and 17 were non-fatally wounded. The attacker had a weapon of war – an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle. It shoots 90 rounds a minute. It had one purpose: to destroy and kill everything in its path.
It was obvious that pressure was going to mount to restrict guns. We’ve all seen the aftermath of the shooting and the emotional pleas. But what surprised me was that beneath the surface there were people, God knows where and paid by God knows whom, creating content online to undermine the victims and to promote pro-gun messages. These videos and pictures had the sole intention of discrediting anyone, including students from the same high school where the massacre took place, who spoke in favour of restricting guns.
The structure of social media meant that this content was moving, and it was moving fast. People were actually believing these misleading images. Students were being called ‘crisis actors’, with videos suggesting that they weren’t really students but paid stooges. Everyone was complicit apparently, including the ‘mainstream media’, from CNN to Bloomberg.
The fake news videos were getting so much steam that one made it to the number one most viewed video on YouTube, before being removed. The amount of disinformation was astounding. It swirled around on Facebook, Twitter and Snapchat. It was a digital war, not with weapons but algorithms and hashtags. It was as if a complete parallel reality had been created and people were not only believing these fake stories, but also using them as an argument in favour of not restricting guns.
The Florida shooting is not the only case. A similar action also happened in the Las Vegas shooting that killed 58 people, with videos claiming a ‘hoax’ and ‘false flag’ deceptions generating millions of views and lots of advertising money for the creators. Social media has become a red rag to a bull for conspiracy theorists and those interested in misinforming and misleading the public.
The end result was that we had two sides of the reality; two sides which were completely opposite to each other.
These trends are very worrying. And there’s more bad news. It seems nobody really has a clue about what to do to tackle this huge problem. Do we really want an authority, whether Facebook or someone else, that controls what is shared and posted? It’s not like the truth has any chance. How can truthful reporting compete with well-financed sponsored fake news articles?
Barack Obama, during an interview with David Letterman, recently said, “One of the biggest challenges we have to our democracy is the degree to which we don’t share a common baseline of facts. At a certain point you just live in a bubble and I think that’s why our politics are so polarised right now”.
The digital echo chamber and the spread of sponsored fake articles by hidden hands is probably one of the biggest challenges facing modern countries. I don’t think we are having to meet this challenge in Malta as yet, but this is not a problem restricted to the US or the UK. Nobody knows what the answer is.
Verifying information and sources was something that journalists and writers in my day were taught on day one. In a world where everyone is a broadcaster within their social media circles, we must emphasise the importance of critical thinking and verification. Compared to the past, when journalists would lose their reputation if they failed to verify a claim, what we have with the internet and social media is a new world which we still don’t fully understand, let alone have solutions for.
Evarist Bartolo is minister for education and employment
-
Court & Police
Constitutional Court scraps €61,000 damages award to former police superintendent
-
National
Professor calls for ban on charity collection boxes and end to ‘dehumanising’ fundraising
-
Court & Police
Taxi driver charged with cocaine possession
More in News-
Business News
Joseph Portelli exits CF Estates shareholding in €6.65 million deal
-
Business News
Developer freezes Lidl Malta funds over Żebbuġ site dispute
-
Business News
HSBC Malta employees to get €30 million in compensation after CrediaBank sale
More in Business-
Other Sports
Pembroke Gymnastics announces successful completion of four-day training camp
-
Motorsports
McLaren Lando Norris wins first F1 world title in dramatic Abu Dhabi finale
-
Motorsports
Three-horse race to the chequered flag: Who will be crowned king in Abu Dhabi?
More in Sports-
Cultural Diary
My essentials: Nickie Sultana’s cultural picks
-
Music
Marco Mengoni stars at Calleja Christmas concert
-
Theatre & Dance
Chucky’s one-person Jack and the Beanstalk panto returns to Spazju Kreattiv
More in Arts-
Opinions
2026: So, it begins!
-
Editorial
Advancing the arts in 2026
-
Opinions
The first domino: Why 2026 is Malta’s moment for a real alternative | Mark Camilleri Gambin
More in Comment-
Restaurants
Gourmet Today festive issue out this Sunday
-
Recipes
Savoury puff pastry Christmas tree
-
Recipes
Stuffed Maltese bread
More in Magazines