Mr Fix It

All politicians will deny that there is political patronage, but this is an integral part of our political culture today

I had taken some black and white pictures of the half finished construction on the Rabat road. Tony Mallia sat at his desk at the Stamperija and told me that he would publish them.

Another obscene construction site by his illustrious 'Il-Lay Lay' and Piju Camilleri, two Lorry Sant 'acquaintances. That was the bad old eighties.  The Democrat now defunct was then a English language newspaper published by the Nationalist party. Then, it was dangerous and sexy to be with the PN.

It was good to be on the other side of the border.

That was 1985.

In 1987 works on the Lay Lay construction were stopped by the new government.

The other day I stopped at the petrol station next to Mount Carmel hospital. I had not driven down the road for ages and was shocked to see the new petrol station. The concession to build in an outside development zone (ODZ) was issued to a well-known family with political connections. The connections were unlike that of Il-Lay Lay. Il-Lay Lay was close to the Labour government - this guy appears to have been close to the Nationalists. There's no proof that he had his permit okayed because of his politics, but all ODZ permits were sanctioned after intense pressure from the applicants. In this country of ours, it's not such a big deal.

What is a big deal is that thirty years down the line, the name 'Lay Lay' means nothing. The guy has been replaced by a new breed of contractors and developers, who change their political allegiance according to their money projects.

All politicians will deny that there is political patronage, but this is an integral part of our political culture today.

Which of course drives me to the obsession of being Mr Fix It.

And Mr Fix It in this scenario is, of course, Joseph Muscat. He has the great ability of securing the allegiance and the silence of his adversaries by investing in their lustful desire for some pocket money (my words, of course).

But is it not strange to see Mark Anthony Falzon first describe his removal from the Ornis Committee as a move dictated by "Muscat's pogrom" and then to accept to stand as chairman of the Ornis committee.

Now hang on a minute, lest I be misunderstood: I do not think for a minute that Falzon is unsuitable for the job. I really think he has all the qualifications for the job.  Even though I find him - what's the word? - oh, yes: pedantic!

Perhaps instead of serving as Ornis chairman, he should join everyone else and collect signatures to block spring hunting, which I'm sure he opposes.

But what strikes me as a pertinent observation is that no one it seems have any self-respect.

I mean just look at Lou Bondi... after having spent all his time accusing MaltaToday of being the 'MaltaMLPToday' he goes off and accepts to be remunerated for his job by Labour.

Then, of course, none of the Nationalist crowd believed that he would have crossed the border.

Lou Bondi and Falzon and now Godwin Grima - more on him later - is part of Mr Fix It's approach to solutions.

The latest decision by Muscat (to appoint Godwin Grima as a regulator for citizenship), did not go down well with the Nationalists. Even though Mr Grima was one of the most trusted civil servants in the Gonzi administration.

Ronnie Pellegrini was yesterday rubbishing on Facebook those who proposed Mr Grima.

The reason being that in politics everyone is dispensable,  and everyone has a price, if they decides to embrace the party.

On citizenship, in my view the PN opposition is rather superficial. You either accept it or object to it.

In my view, offering up citizenship for any price is wrong.

The PN try very hard to give the impression that they have better solutions to this citizenship scheme. But really, when you see the residence permits they issued while they were in government, I begin to wonder whether they can reasonably offer a better alternative.

Which is why the Mr Fix It approach may sometimes backfire.

Surely, Joseph Muscat's approach is miles away from the Mintoffian style.

In Dom Mintoff's days, if you were married to foreigner, you could not purchase a property if you did not have the signature of the Minister of Finance.

Now I do not want to personalise the argument, but when I married in 1987 I could not purchase a property unless sanctioned by the finance minister. And the finance minister Wistin Abela refused to sign, so I rented instead. Worse still, because I had a foreign spouse I could not apply for subsidised loan from the Lohombus bank.

Labour has come a long way. 

Perhaps it has ideologically derailed itself in the process.

The truth is that the target for Muscat is to get this through as soon as is possible to allow for money from citizenships to roll in.

The truth is that there are possibly more than 200 potential clients, and this could mean more than €150 million revenue. That would change Muscat's profit and loss in more than way.

Well... that is the story of modern day politics.

avatar
El Kayboj First, you never mentioned anything about EU citizens who have as full a right as Maltese to operate in Malta. No due diligence is ever requested of them. Second, a majority shareholder in a major Maltese bank has been fined $1.92 billion, by US federal authorities for laundering the money of drug barons and other criminals. I don't recall Lawrence, or Simon the Boy Blunder, crying about Malta's financial services sector being put at risk. Hence, do you recommend renationalizing that bank to insure that Malta is not put under any international scrutiny?
avatar
FXT. I cannot agree with you. Of course Saviour has like all of us his opinions and biases but to be fair to him he has always opened his newspapers to comments from both political sides fairly. He also employs journalists from both sides of the political divide. Just think of the other local English newspapers and their scandalous biases and like me you must often have had comments rejected if they hammered the PN. I would say that Malta Today played a big role in bringing over to vote for the PL many floaters and persons with an independent mind, Many of the abuses of the former gov were brought to light because of Saviours investigations. Let us admit that now he must also act as a guardian against the inevitable opportunists who try to simply obtain undeserved personal favors from this new look gov.
avatar
It seems the fact that the editor has decided to call a spade a spade once again has irked some readers as it is against their political beliefs. Incredible don't you think that one day you are hailed as a hero and the next derided by some readers. And to Better Future. This does not incentivise anything in the financial services sector except increase the need for Anti-Money Laundering procedures and ultra-increased due diligence when foreigners are to do business with Maltese-owned entities. Congrats Joey for ruining so many years of hard work in 9 months!
avatar
Mr. Balzan, you had to mention Mr. Lou Bondi. Don't you know that everyone has a price and Mr. Bondi happens to come very cheap!
avatar
Mr. Balzan, you had to mention Mr. Lou Bondi. Don't you know that everyone has a price and Mr. Bondi happens to come very cheap!
avatar
joseph mercieca
I never envisaged that that rookie teacher I encountered at Sir Adrian Dingli Girls’ Secondary would one day control a newspaper. In today’s world that makes you a power individual. Moreover this newspaper’s popularity is growing by leaps and bounds. It is a tribute to your tenacity, ambition and expertise. I am giving credit where credit is due. I also must admit that it is the only journal I read. None the less I strongly dissent with its editorial policy which is predominately against Labour. Its bloggers are all finding fault with Labour’s policies and never say anything positive. In fact they enlarge any mistakes by Labour and make issues out of really trivial things. For example I have yet to read a blog about the Budget. Saviour you have a profound rancour against Labour. For you the history of the Labour administration is encapsulated in the bad old 80s. For Saviour the first two Mintoff administrations never happened. I accept all this as I feel and believe in freedom of opinion and the press. What I have been hankering about is the question of Lorry Sant. Now this I cannot accept from you Saviour. Let us make clear I hardly knew Lorry Sant and only once did I have a conversation with him. Lorry Sant was depicted as the bad boy of the Party. Was this picture true or false? I cannot say. Saviour things it is true I have no qualms with that. Lorry Sant is now long departed but Saviour Balzan does not miss a beat to describe Lorry Sant as corrupt and the embodiment of all that is dirty in politics. I feel that this is wrong and cruel because apart from the fact that he cannot defend himself he has left his wife and family and I do not think in a deontological sense it is just to continue spewing bile on a deceased person. Saviour you of all people should appreciate this more than others.
avatar
Dear camillu, if you go back in time you may reread my comments re Aliyev! And kindly DO not confuse my stand with that of the PL. I make up my own mind! I would have agreed to this operation, as I am in agreement with financial services and incentives to foreigners in this sphere.
avatar
The point is that the PM Joseph Muscat has that intangible ability and charisma to win over people. Saviour, you mention two or three people but forgot to mention others like John Dalli and other former prominent PN supporters who are effectively fully cooperating with the new gov even though for social reasons they do not openly declare it. More importantly he managed to unite his party after decades of internal frition. Also significantly I would say that after Boffa he is the first PL leader who made inroads and won over a substantial number of the traditional PN supporter base. The closest equivalent I would say is that he is a hybrid of Tony Blair and Thatcher providing for his leadership the best features of both. If things keep on going like this he will continue winning new adherents to compound the problems of the PN's weak leader.
avatar
One wonders what Better Future's (and Labour's) reaction would have been if such a scheme of selling Malta's soul would have been if it had been introduced by a Nationalist Party? As we say in Maltese...holl xaghrek u gib iz-zejt.
avatar
Fabian Psaila
Why not a poll on whether one prefers to Citizenship scheme as a source of Government income to INCREASE IN TAXATION?
avatar
Allura Salv? Doesn't Malta need the money? And what difference is this to making tax laws and regulations "attractive" to all and sundry ol'moneybags? After all, let me say it straight, old moneybags could always marry a Maltese, and in the process pay zilc. then again, weren't some marriages annulled because the Maltese party got fed up and declared that they had married for money? Of course you are perfectly correct about political patronage. I suppose it has drifted down from the Sicilian connection.