Restrictive legal aid system could breach human rights

Man convicted of robbery files a constitutional application claiming his right to a fair trial was breached due to Malta's restrictive legal aid system.

The European Court of Human Rights
The European Court of Human Rights

Aaron Cassar today filed a constitutional application claiming the current restrictive Legal Aid structure in force at the law courts breached his fundamental human rights

In 2012, Cassar together with a certain Noel Frendo was accused of aggravated theft, illegal possession of a firearm and relapsing. A trial by jury convicted the accused and he was handed an eight-year jail term and fined €2,000..

Cassar appealed the judgement and throughout his jury and his ongoing appeal, he was represented by a legal aid lawyer.

However, the European Court of Human Rights states that the lawyer should be chosen by the accused and paid for by the state.

While this was the case until 2000, amendments in court procedures narrowed the choice to a list of ten lawyers who are assigned cases on a roster basis. In the case of trials by jury there is only one legal aid lawyer available.

Furthermore, the constitutional right of the accused to be assisted by a Legal Aid lawyer states that same lawyer is to be sufficiently remunerated to guarantee a proper defence.

Currently legal aid lawyers are paid €2,329 annually irrespective of the number of cases they handle. Such remuneration could impinge on the accused's right to a fair trial.

The Constitutional Application further explains how the accused was not offered legal assistance at the interrogation stage, he had no access to his police case file, and all form of legal assistance was excluded throughout the investigation.

Cassar is arguing his right to a fair trial was breached due to the restrictive legal aid system applied by the Maltese Courts and the absence of legal assistance at interrogation stage.

Dr Franco Debono signed Cassar's Constitutional Application.

Speaking to MaltaToday, Debono said that Malta is the only country which applies such a restricted list of legal aid lawyers.

"While most countries allow the accused to choose a lawyer who is then paid by the state, others have adopted a system similar to ours but their list of legal aid lawyers runs well over ten lawyers", Debono said.

avatar
So this man committed a crime and he was found guilty by a jury of his peers. Now he is demanding which lawyer is to represent him in court at the expense of the Tax Payers money? I agree that this man should be represented by a Legal Aid lawyer if he cannot afford one. But I think that if the Tax Payer is paying for his defense then the Tax payer is the one to choose the legal Aid lawyer to represent him. As far as Franco Debono goes, he will sign his name to anything that will get him personal attention. He was the one willing to sell his own Party (the PN) down the toilet because it served his personal gain. Funny how the accused has more rights than the victim these days.
avatar
Every one has human rights except for victims! This 'political correctness' has gone crazy! Criminals should pay their victims, get what they deserve and if they do not correct their ways they should go back to prison. I am especially referring to those people responsible for thefts, hold ups on old people, and murders.