Labour presents referendum motion

Labour Leader Joseph Muscat has formally presented to Parliament a “unanimously approved” motion that calls for a referendum on divorce before the pending bill is debated by the House.

 

Addressing a press conference outside the PL headquarters in Hamrun, Joseph Muscat stressed that his parliamentary group was “united” in unanimously supporting the motion calling for the consultative referendum – which was confirmed by a secret vote.

Muscat stressed the need for consultation with the electorate on the divorce issue, given that no party has a mandate for the introduction of divorce in Malta.

The PL motion proposes that the referendum question is based on the elements of the pending bill proposed by PN MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando and PL MP Evarist Bartolo, including that couples have to be separated for four years before they become eligible for divorce:

The motion resolves that referendum’s question should be “The motion agrees that the introduction for the choice of divorce for married couples who have been separated or not living together for not less than 4 years, and where who have no reasonable possibility for reconciliation, while adequate alimony is guaranteed and children are safeguarded.”

The motion also resolves to call the referendum before parliament begins to debate the Divorce private members’ bill. “A referendum should be called not more than seven days from the approval of this resolution….and this consultative referendum should take place within not more than 40 days from when it is called,” the motion reads.”

Muscat emphasised that the entirety of the PL’s parliamentary group are four-square behind the motion, recognising that public consultation was critical prior to the Private Members’ Bill debate in parliament.

Muscat added that the Opposition would also be requesting an emergency meeting of the House Business Committee to decide on when the motion would be vote on.

Asked about the referendum’s outcome, Muscat said that as a consultative referendum, the PL would abide by the outcome which he said would be “binding.” He however did not exclude whether the PL would “bring up the issue or not” at a later stage. “Regardless of the result, we retain our convictions,” Muscat said.

Faced with claims by the media that he previously professed himself against a referendum, and described this as a failure to govern, Muscat said that he was previously quoted out of context.

He defended himself by saying that he had always said that some sort of consultation with the public was called for, and maintained that given the situation and the legislation that is now tabled before parliament, there is a need for public consultation to take place now (before the private members’ bill is debated”.

He responded to questions about divisions in his parliamentary group by maintaining that the PL’s parliamentary group is not one of factions or influence groups. “I will defend the interests and values of everyone in my parliamentary group.” he said. “I don’t have to watch my back.”

Asked if he would take an active role or campaign in the referendum, given that he has strongly and consistently in favour of divorce, Muscat was evasive. “There are already two-fully fledged pro and anti divorce movements debating the issue,” he said, emphasising that the PL wouldn’t be campaigning or actively participating in the debate.

He also refuted suggestions that the PL was basing its move on internal polls that hint towards a yes referendum result. “God forbid we make such a decision on the basis on polls,” he said.

Hounded for a PL stand position on divorce, Muscat would only reiterate his previous position that he is in favour of divorce, and that the party would guarantee a free vote to its parliamentary members to vote according to their conscience.

In recent days, the PN has consistently attempted to exploit the fact that the PL has, as yet, not adopted a stance either for or against the introduction of divorce, claiming a policy of convenience and a lack of conviction.

In one of his repeated digs at Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, Muscat “promised” that the PL “will not change its position every 24 hours" while expressing hope that the new motion be debated in Parliament next week.

avatar
@Mark Navarro. How can anyone of us happily married or single deprive any other who's marriage did not succeed. This is what's being asked if the motion presented in parliament is voted for. ie: To hold a Referendum. [“Do you agree with the possibility of introducing divorce for married couples who have been separated or who haven’t lived together for four years, and provided that there is no hope for reconciliation between the pair and when adequate maintenance is guaranteed and their children cared for?”] Lets spread the word, I'm not sure that this known nation wide yet. Some still think that with a legislated Divorce in place, One can easily opt for it whenever one's feels like it. I'm happily married thank God and I cant see that I'll ever revert to divorce. The reason I'm saying this is that I've been married for many years now and also at my age. But still we all have children and anything can happen. So why not have a proper Law which takes care of mainly the kids amongst other matters in an event of a failed marriage. Lets hope the Citizens of this Nation thinks positive and with an open mind. Regards
avatar
The Divorce Bill that was presented in Parliament, which is going to be decided next April in a referendum, only allows couples who have lived apart for four years out of the last five to apply. Their lawyer has to certify that they have done everything possible to reconcile and the magistrate will have to ensure that the children and stay-at-home spouse are adequately taken care of. Do you agree with this Divorce Bill? Possible Referendum in April! Jiena IVA ghaz zwieg IVA ghad divorzju inti? Xinhi l-opinjoni taghkom hbieb?
avatar
If it were not for the PL, we would not be discussing this hot issue. Gonzi wanted to" kill the bill" on referendun, and acted worse than Uma Thurman, in the film "Kill Bill" by Tarantino! For the first time in history we will be voting in a referendum without tricks or false pretentions. This is called respect, respect for the intelligence of the Maltese, who hopefully have come of age and therefore can decide without pressure from the Political Party-at least for now. Thank you Joseph Muscat; you were a bout of fresh air. Let the people decide!
avatar
In 2008 Joseph Muscat was elected leader of the Labour party and he promised that as a PM he would take a Bill to parliament and his MPs would be given a free vote. This means that once elected there would not be a need for a REFERENDUM !!! And yes it would had been a waste of time and money to hold a referendum after one have been elected to serve the country. That was what he said back then and this is what he's saying now. I fail to see where the contradiction lies in all this. Is this that difficult to understand ?? Possibli il-parlamentari Nazzjonalisti dan ma jifmuhx ?? No wonder why this country is being stripped of all its wealth and standard of living. The Pn promised a referendum yesterday and wanted to scrap the referendum today to suit its anti-divorce-at-all-costs agenda. So much for Consistency and credibility!!
avatar
The Gonz is the most outrageous wind-vane one could think of. First he bamboozles his cronies into voting through a show of hands, assisted by Austin Gatt who said that a secret vote would not be 'rgulija', then he suddenly shelves the motion he intensively sought and acquired. These are sure signs that the Gonz has lost it. If he behaves like this on such an easy matter, what can you expect him to do on the much more complicated and complex matters in the economic and financial field? If the Gonz were to win the coming elections it would spell the end to all our hopes for a better future. People, wake up! Do you want Europe to look at you and comparing you with the Tunisians, the Egyptians, and now the Iranians and find you wanting? How could you face the Europeans who know what democracy really is and would therefore be ready to classify you at an even lower level than the Muslims who have never experienced democracy in their countries?
avatar
@ beppez Here is the 12th paragrapg - it speaks for itself: "On divorce – Muscat retaliated his stand on divorce, of allowing a free vote in parliament. He said that divorce should be legislated in parliament and not through a referendum. However, it is yet to be seen whether or not the Nationalist MPs will be allowed a free vote, he added. The Labour leader also said the Today Public Policy institute (TPPI) vindicated his view. "
avatar
@david fg You are either mistaken which is acceptable, or you are trying to confuse matter. GONZIPN propaganda machine. Please read and read again, I'm sure you'll understand. Naf x'jin nghid habib. Kont akkanit hafna aktar min kullhadd hawn taht. EX PN voter
avatar
@beppez and all PN apologists This is very simple to understand sabih. If you still can't figure it out i suggest you seek help asap. Regards
avatar
No more bloggng fom me, no more votes for anyone. To Hell with you all. I am sick and tired of being lied to by ALL OUR politicians. Good luck all you fanatical PN and PL supporters. You will all be disappointed next time round.
avatar
@beppez and all PN apologists. GONZIPN and their propaganda machine is running full speed ahead in order to retain some of GONZI's credential's. They are trying to sell that Dr.Joseph Muscat was all against a referendum on divorce. What was said back then by Dr.Joseph Muscat has nothing to do with the motion being presented this evening. The motion is asking the parliament to vote for or against a referendum asking the people what is preferred by them, either a YES or a NO. This is very different from legislating a Divorce bill in Parliament. Something that would be done by Dr.Muscat if the majority of votes from the referendum would say YES. This is when what Dr.Muscat said way back in 2009 that he will legislate in parliament for a divorce law. This after he would then have a popular mandate to do so. Ex PN voter
avatar
I have had it with politicians, they are a bunch of weasels, Muscat said the following in 2008 'He said that divorce should be legislated in parliament and not through a referendum' Now, he has changed his mind but claims that he never does. What an absolute mess. I feel I shall not be voting for any of these people again, neither PN or PL or AD. They are taking me for an idiot. Shame on all of you. PN, PL et al
avatar
What sort of democratic European leader comes up with so many new tricks not to let the people decide? The eye of the tiger is the referendum; Gonzi says he is listening,but we all know that big egos have little ears!
avatar
@beppez Darba staqsew lil Napuljun liema kienet l-aktar battalja qallijla la qatt igieled. Taf x'wiegeb ? L-aktar wahda qallijla u diifili kienet biex infihem nies bhall beppez. Il-Garlozz idahhal rasu fir ramel u jaseb li hadd mhu qed jarah. Trid tibqa tqarraq beppez !!! Intix xi wiehed li hadt l-annullament ghal darba, tnejn jew tlieta habib. Tislijiet.
avatar
"He (Muscat) said that divorce should be legislated in parliament and not through a referendum." http://www.maltastar.com/pages/r1/ms10dart.asp?a=1963
avatar
not 24 hrs just a bit more..... just go on this link and look at the 12th para...http://www.maltastar.com/pages/r1/ms10dart.asp?a=1963 .....ask him if he changed his opinion about the EU.....
avatar
Are'nt 24 hours too long???????