Watch, listen, don’t clap: the BA’s barmy rules for audiences

‘Equal treatment’ rules prevents participants from clapping or reacting during political leaders’ debates

‘The two leaders danced the foxtrot to no reaction or applause from the Xarabank audience…’
‘The two leaders danced the foxtrot to no reaction or applause from the Xarabank audience…’

The Broadcasting Authority's new guidelines for programmes dealing with the 2013 elections on state TV will reduce live audiences to lifeless spectators, because they are effectively prohibited to clap and react during political debates.

Expect no applause and only dignified silence as Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi and Opposition leader Joseph Muscat face each other tonight Friday, on Xarabank.

Far from beckoning the baying audience to react in a civilised manner, the Broadcasting Authority will demand that spectators are equally split between the participants, that they are not allowed to applaud except at the introduction and conclusion of the debate; that all their questions be vetted beforehand to ensure 'impartiality, balance and fairness'; and for PBS not to broadcast the reactions of the audience to the answers of the leaders.

"Cutaway shots of individual members of the audience are only permissible if one of the leaders is addressing directly the person who asked the question. Some group shots and wide shots are allowed during the debate. However these shots must be divided equally if they are used, while one of the leaders is replying to a question," the BA says in its guidelines.

Equally strict are the guidelines for moderators, who have been told they are unable to pass comment on their participants' reply except for additional questions on the details of the answer.

And for the first time, there will be no televoting on the performance of the participants: an unscientific poll that has riled parties many a time. Televoting will only be allowed on a political question, and when accompanied with a disclaimer that the poll is not scientific.

Broadcasting Authority Directive Programmes by maltatoday

 

Rules

The aim of these rules is to ensure that during debates party leaders or deputy leaders are treated equally not only in the amount of time given but also in the moderator's conduct.

The responsibility to ensure equal treatment falls squarely on the programme's producers and the station. Ultimately it is the station's registered editor who assumes responsibility for what is broadcast.

Audience

The audience must be equally split between the participants/parties to safeguard the principle of equal treatment.

No clapping or other forms of interruption are allowed except in the introduction and conclusion of the programme. Members of the audience must be instructed on what is expected of them during the debate. The rules are agreed between the parties and the producer.

Members of the audience who are chosen to pose questions must pass the questions to the producer beforehand and the criteria for the selection of questions must be based on impartiality, balance and fairness. The questions must reflect equal treatment of the participants.

Questions must be relevant to the current national political debate.

An equal number of questions must be asked to the participants.

Members of the audience posing questions must limit themselves to asking the agreed question and refrain from adding frivolous comments and supplementary questions.

Cutaways and reactions of individual members of the audience while a participant is speaking are not allowed.

Members of the audience must be shown asking the questions in close-up.

Cutaway shots of individual members of the audience are only permissible if one of the leaders is addressing directly the person who asked the question.

Some group shots and wide shots are allowed during the debate. However these shots must be divided equally if they are used, while one of the leaders is replying to a question.

Role of the moderator

The moderator must ensure that the leaders' time is divided as agree,

The moderator must ensure that the programme is flowing and that leaders are treated equally.

The moderator cannot pass any comments on the participants' replies of interventions but can pose additional questions on details mentioned by the participants during their replies.

The moderator cannot participate in the debate but he must ask questions and conduct the programme in a just, impartial, fair and balance way.

The moderator must ensure that the programme is conducted in a civilised manner, disallow interruptions between the leaders and use all his abilities to ensure that viewers understand what is being said.

The moderator is obliged to ensure that any disabled participants are treated in a manner which facilitate their abilities and do whatever is possible to ensure that their message is delivered according to their needs.

The moderator must not gesticulate or make any signs that could confuse the participants.

Programme's structure

Participants must be in place as soon as the programme starts.

The moderator must introduce the participants and ask them to hold an introduction which is not longer then one minute thirty seconds or a length of time agreed beforehand.

In each section of the programme two questions from the audience are allowed (or a number of questions agreed to by the participants beforehand), following the procedures established above.

Participants must be guaranteed equal time to reply to questions.

Parts of the programme must be an open debate between the participants and these must be granted equal time and identical camera work.

Participants must be granted equal time for their concluding remarks.

The order of appearance must respect the current criterion, meaning that the leader of the Opposition starts first and the Prime Minister concludes, however in the case of a debate between deputy leaders an agreement between the participants must be reached between the parties and the producer and in the absence of an agreement the order must be established by lottery. The order of speakers must be included in the programme's running order.

The debate's themes must be agreed between the producer and party representatives beforehand. This guarantees impartiality and fairness.

Televoting questions on who is performing better are not allowed. If a political televoting question is included in the programme, the station is obliged to include a disclaimer that televoting is not a scientific poll and that the result does not necessarily reflect the general opinion.

This directive is also applicable to debates between party deputy leaders.

avatar
WHAT A FARCE. WHAT ARROGANCE. PEPPI STARTED THE PROGRAMME BY CLAIMING THAT XARABANK HAS LONG BEEN ADHERING TO THE NEW RULES OF THE BROADCASTING AUTHORITY. IN TYPICAL STYLE OF HIS MASTER, THE PROGRAMME STARTED WITH A DOWNRIGHT LIE, A BLATANT LIE, AN ARROGANT LIE AND IN TRUE STYLE OF GONZIPN IT WAS ASSUMED THAT THE LISTENERS WERE STUPID AND ARE INCAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING THE TRUE CONCEPTS OF JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY. WE, THE PEOPLE OF MALTA AND GOZO ARE LOOKING FORWARD AND COUNTING DOWN TO THE DAY WHEN THIS ARROGANCE WILL BE DISPERSED AWAY FROM OUR SHORES. GOD BLESS MALTA AND MAY HE GUIDE US MALTESE AND GOZITANS TO FINALLY RID OURSELVES OF THE ARROGANT AND CORRUPT GONZIPN.
avatar
Whilst I do not necessarily agree with all the rules, I do not think they are barmy. They make sure that the debates are not hijacked by somebody with a personal agenda. As such, even if they take out some of the spontaneity, they are needed. By the way, clapping is also not allowed during US Presidential debates (see http://www.scribd.com/doc/110073567/The-2012-Debates-Memorandum-of-Understanding-Between-the-Obama-and-Romney-Campaigns)
avatar
Kollha jobduhom Peppi Norman u Bondi dawn il-guidlines Kieku jobduhom Bondi ma jibqax Bondi u isir moderatur normali: imma din 'l-abberition' li Bondi ikun oggettiv u mhux pro-GonziPN u anti Labour- ma tista issir qatt! U ghalhekk bhal ma qal Dante jien nghid lil BA u lil min jara l-politcal debates fuq PBS: Give up all hope'!
avatar
Joseph MELI
Is this diktat what is commonly referred to as Clap-Trap?
avatar
Joseph MELI
What we need is a Jeremy Paxman -type moderator to cut through the crap and keep them on their toes to ensure they answer the actual questions -not some fawning,scaredy-cat accolyte who wont stop them from turning such dog and pony shows into a Party Political broadcast
avatar
The last question time between Tonio Fenech and five journalists was so dead with a capital 'D' that for a one minute question I guess Tonio had 10 minute talk of a sort of reply. If today's debate will go by what I saw this week, I suggest turn the sound off, because you will hear more of the same. Gonzi is our hope and Muscat mean loss of jobs. We still can read their body language and one leader in particular really show up when he is red under the collar with hot question, of course it is labour to blame.
avatar
Ara fejn kellhom jaslu minhabba tal-WE u GOnziPN.
avatar
Joseph Sant
Looks like everyone is barmy! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/election_2010/8587362.stm What Mr Balzan should have said was that serious debates should not have been allowed to degenerate into Jerry Springer type shows. What must have brought this about was the current presenters' ridiculous and biased behaviour.
avatar
Igor P. Shuvalov
Expect such rules from these Authorities who tend to go from one extreme to the other.
avatar
Joseph MELI
When you do watch and listen to all the bovine excretia ....its enough to give you the clap!
avatar
Looking forward to reading the rules that, if broken, get one sent to room 101...