Employers don’t like sick leave proposal – Muscat fails to reply

Labour leader in two-hour Q&A session with social partners, NGOs and other representatives of civil society.

Labour leader Joseph Muscat failed to reply to concerns raised by the Malta Hotels and Restaurants Association and the Malta Employers' Association to a proposal by both Labour and the PN to allow parents to apply for sick leave when their children fall ill.

Two of the several interventions made were that of MHRA president Tony Zahra and MEA president Joe Farrugia, who urged the parties to reconsider their position on sick leave.

"Whoever thought that having this sick leave proposal would be a good idea? Imagine people applying for sick leave because their pet falls ill and they had nobody to take care of it. This is a big cause of concern to the industry and I urge both parties to revise this proposal," Zahra said.

On his part, Joe Farrugia said that while the MEA welcomed proposals such as the introduction of more childcare centres and extending school hours, it found the sick leave proposal for parents of sick children "worrying".

"It's important that we find a balance between labour supply and demand... But let's be careful not to introduce measures which hinder labour demand," Farrugia said.

But despite the clear opposition to the proposal, Muscat failed to provide an answer as he focused on other points raised during the discussion.

In his introductory speech, Muscat said this was the first time in Maltese political history that a party was saying it would spend less on its programme the PN's touted €1.1 billion programme. "The PN's plan will either break the bank, or else have to be backed up by new taxes, or fail to fulfill all promises. On the other hand, our programme costs €732 million - a realistic programme - and is based on EU and IMF projections," Muscat said, who claims his programme will lead to a deficit of 0.5% of GDP by 2017.

Muscat also said that deputy leader Louis Grech's main responsibility, if Labour were elected, would be to see that the PL electoral programme was carried out.

In his intervention, MHRA president Tony Zahra lauded Labour's manifesto and its energy plan, particularly the more transparent process by which utility prices would be set. "Good governance means accountability, something which we want to see more."

Zahra said the country's institutions were "no longer what they used to be... heads rolling when they failed to assume responsibility... continuing in this direction could be a blow for the country's reputation. Look at countries abroad: ministers resign and this is the culture which we must introduce. There is a dire need for responsibility and transparency."

During his short intervention, GWU secretary general vowed to keep on defending workers. "Yes, I am still here defending workers and will continue to do so," was the first thing Zarb said. He went on to add that the PL had included 22 of the GWU's proposals in its manifesto and reassured that the GWU will continue fighting against precarious work.

avatar
And what guarantee do these employers have that such sick leave is not being taken? I'm sure there are already parents phoning sick because their child is sick, not because they are sick. All it takes is to produce a medical certificate, which is not difficult to do.
avatar
"Imagine people applying for sick leave because their pet falls ill and they had nobody to take care of it." Who mentioned pets? Or is Mr. Zahra comparing the workers children as animals?
avatar
Is this the way they show gratitude to their fellow employees. I remember Ernest Barry when once when he was interviewed he loathed the Zahras for their support so that he could continue with his football career. Thumbs-up for the Zahras. However I am very disappointed if they do not like such a sensible proposal.
avatar
Ikun interessanti li jkunu nafu jekk l-istess ghaqdiet ilmentawx mal partit tal PN dwar din l-istess proposta, u jekk iva x'kienet it twegiba taghhom.
avatar
Don`t employers know that employees take sick leave to care for their very sick children.
avatar
Dear Mr Zahra, who would take care of your children if you are sick - of course you an afford all the carers in the world. But who would take care of ordinary citizens whose children are very sick? Take them out of the house to a grandparent and risk multiple infections, or leave them in their home to be taken care of. HAVE A HEART! and what about pets too? When you live with your pet who gives you all the love in the world, what is wrong with giving something back and be with him in his hour of need. Pets are God's creation too, just like you are. St Francis of Assisi used to call them brothers and sisters after all. You cannot have all the cake and eat it all to yourself.
avatar
Well the employers think what they like. Children are our future. Anyway someone has to take care for their sick chioldren. Maybe their employees call sick themselves.3