‘Replicated’ email that Gatt will report to police for inconsistent formatting
Minister suspected ‘Labour frame-up’ after MaltaToday’s email of Farrugia-Gatt meeting were incorrectly replicated by Times.
A surreal press conference if there ever was one.
Transport minister Austin Gatt today declared he was filing a police report against the Labour Party, accusing them of manipulating an email circulating on Facebook, an email whose contents were first published in MaltaToday on Wednesday.
The problem was... there are three emails. The first one is MaltaToday's, published in its entirety on Wednesday, 13 February in its Midweek print edition; and then on maltatoday.com.mt with a snapshot of the email itself.
The second email is allegedly the same one, but circulating on Facebook.
The third one - and this is where things got messy - was published in The Times's print edition of Thursday, 14 February. Only that it's not strictly the original one: the Times replicated the 'Facebook email' - and it duly captioned the reproduction by stating that it was a replica - however giving the original typos a spellcheck and reformatting it with some broken paragraphs.
The result? A frame-up that may not be a frame-up.
Austin Gatt told journalists today he categorically denied discussing any contracts for the supply of oil to Enemalta during his time as energy minister, with George Farrugia, the Trafigura and Total agent. Indeed, emails between Farrugia and a Total representation show the trader claiming that he had held a meeting with Gatt.
But it was at the point that the Bondiplus presenter Lou Bondì - Gatt's Gozitan cousin - started inquiring about the email that the minister braced himself for his announcement.
Ministry aides entered the press conference with A3 copies of the email that appeared in The Times and the one in MaltaToday a day earlier, and the minister proceeded to point out the differences in formatting and spelling. He also pointed out, that in another email, this time from George Farrugia to then Enemalta chairman Tancred Tabone on 4 June 2003, the date appeared in the English language - not in Maltese, as the Farrugia-Total emails carried by the Times and MaltaToday show.
It was only until the intervention of a representative from the Times that it was clearly explained that the newspaper had replicated the contents of the email off the 'Facebook email' - because they did not have the original version - having duly captioned it as a 'replica'.
"If MaltaToday's email is the original version, then the Facebook one is false," Gatt replied. "I have no doubt that the MaltaToday email is the original one," he later said.
Adding further to the confusion was the fact that MaltaToday's snapshot did not capture the email's sentences in their entirety, clipping off some consonants and vowels. As can be seen from the photos, the Times's replica does not include the missing words either.
And yet despite this clarification, Gatt insisted that he would still go to the Commissioner of Police on Friday morning to report the alleged 'fabrication' of the email - the Facebook one - claiming that "only Labour stood to benefit" from the "frame-up".
But when it turned out that the 'frame-up' was a confusing replica that the Times had produced, why was he still reporting it to the police?
"I have a suspicion that this is a frame-up, because I believe Labour is behind it. I still think it is valid to go to the police... since this matter is in Labour's interest, the natural suspicion falls on Labour."