Kids’ loss of concentration from digital addiction: EP lawmakers demand safeguards
The European Parliament has called for the development of ethical digital products that do not rely on dark patterns and addictive designs
The European Parliament has called on Brussels to address existing legal gaps and introduce new legislation against addictive design in digital games, apps, and social media.
In a report supported by 545 MEPs (12 votes against, 61 abstentions), MEPs have sounded a warning on the addictive nature of online games, social media, streaming services, and online marketplaces, which exploit users’ vulnerabilities to capture their attention and monetise their data.
Now they will tell the European Commission to increase consumer protection through safer alternatives, even if these are not as profitable for social media platforms.
The European Commission is currently evaluating the need to update certain consumer protection legislation to ensure a high level of protection in the digital environment, with results are expected in 2024. Parliament’s report will feed into this ongoing fitness check.
“No self-discipline can beat Big Tech’s tricks, fuelled by armies of designers and psychologists to keep you glued to your screen,” said Dutch MEP Kim Van Sparrentak (Greens).
“If we do not act now, this will have an impact on the mental health and brain development of generations to come. Today, the European Parliament sends a strong signal: the EU has to be the first in the world to tackle the addictive design of online services.”
Acknowledging the positive effect social media can have on society, MEPs are concerned about the physical, psychological and material harm addictive design can have, including loss of concentration and cognitive ability, burnout, stress, depression, limited physical activity.
“They are particularly worried about the prolonged impact on minors’ health, and want more research on the risks related to online services,” said Van Sparrentak.
Problematic smartphone or internet use has been linked to lower life satisfaction and mental health symptoms such as depression, low self-esteem, anxiety, lack of sleep and obsessive-compulsive behaviour, with children and young people the most vulnerable.
Young people aged 16-24 spend an average of over seven hours a day on the internet, with one in four displaying problematic smartphone use resembling addiction.
If not addressed, Van Sparrentak and supporting MEPs said, Parliament should use its right of legislative initiative.
The report voted on Tuesday now calls for an assessment and a ban on harmful addictive techniques not covered by the directive on Unfair Commercial Practice, such as infinite scroll, default auto play, constant push and read receipt notifications.
Highlighting the lack of transparency consumers and enforcers experience on online services, MEPs also said companies should be obliged to develop ethical and fair digital products and services “by design” without dark patterns, misleading, or addictive design.
To mitigate the addictive nature of platforms and empower consumers, the Commission is urged to present a digital “right not to be disturbed”.
MEPs also want the Commission to create a list of good design practices like “think before you share”, turning off notifications by default, chronological feeds, greyscale mode, automatic locks, and total screen time summaries. They also propose awareness-raising campaigns to cultivate safer and healthier online habits.
This article is part of a content series called Ewropej. This is a multi-newsroom initiative part-funded by the European Parliament to bring the work of the EP closer to the citizens of Malta and keep them informed about matters that affect their daily lives. This article reflects only the author’s view. The action was co-financed by the European Union in the frame of the European Parliament's grant programme in the field of communication. The European Parliament was not involved in its preparation and is, in no case, responsible for or bound by the information or opinions expressed in the context of this action. In accordance with applicable law, the authors, interviewed people, publishers or programme broadcasters are solely responsible. The European Parliament can also not be held liable for direct or indirect damage that may result from the implementation of the action.