Engerer fields questions at Europa House’s together.eu interview in Valletta
Meet your MEP at these Together.eu events at Europa House in Valletta
“You have the right to live in an environment that doesn’t kill you, and therefore a healthy environment is essential as a human right,” said Labour MEP Cyrus Engerer during a public debate on the environment as a human right at Europe House.
Engerer emphasised that without a healthy environment, people’s health also suffers, leading to a deteriorating quality of life
He said that in the European Parliament work is being done to include this right in the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, and it could possibly become part of the reform of the Union Treaties.
He also took the view that work can be done proactively: “Malta could change its constitution and introduce the right to a healthy environment, and take a leading role in Europe on this as it has done in the field of LGBTIQ rights.”
Engerer was interviewed by moderator Claire Agius Ordway and took questions from the public.
He spoke about his work in the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, in the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as well as in the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.
He also spoke about his work in the Special Committee against cancer, where research analysed showed that cancer could be reduced by 40%, and this objective was introduced as a basis for each Committee’s work.
He also spoke about civil liberties, equality, mental health, the life situations of LGBTIQ people, and access to medicines, including his work for a derogation to enable continued access in Malta to medicines from the UK.
Engerer encouraged action at various levels, national, European and even individual through European citizens’ initiatives, stressing the importance of participating in the European elections, to influence Europe’s direction: “With our vote we will also be determining who will lead the European Union and what political path it will take in the coming years.”
The debate was also interpreted in sign language and broadcast live online on the social media of the European Parliament in Malta.
Engerer participated in one of a series of events organised by the European Parliament Office in Malta to inform and engage the public on the work of the European Parliament and of the Maltese MEPs as the current five-year term comes to an end this year.
These discussions are also part of the EP’s together.eu initiative. The next public debate will be with MEP David Casa on the European Disability Card on 9 February at 17.00 at the House of Europe.
About Cyrus Engerer
Engerer has been MEP in the S&D Group since November 2020. He is a member of the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee, and a substitute member of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Affairs, and also of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.
He has led the EP’s work on the market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme until 2030, and is currently leading on the Green Claims Directive, a proposed EU rule to assess and verify explicit environmental claims. He has also led Parliament’s report on the implementation of the principle of the primacy of EU law.
This article is part of a content series called Ewropej. This is a multi-newsroom initiative part-funded by the European Parliament to bring the work of the EP closer to the citizens of Malta and keep them informed about matters that affect their daily lives. This article reflects only the author’s view. The action was co-financed by the European Union in the frame of the European Parliament's grant programme in the field of communication. The European Parliament was not involved in its preparation and is, in no case, responsible for or bound by the information or opinions expressed in the context of this action. In accordance with applicable law, the authors, interviewed people, publishers or programme broadcasters are solely responsible. The European Parliament can also not be held liable for direct or indirect damage that may result from the implementation of the action.