Caruana Galizia public inquiry: former PN secretary-general says Labour's gas power station plan was similar to presentation he was given in 2009
Paul Borg Olivier tells Daphne Caruana Galizia public inquiry that Paul Apap Bologna had tried selling him plans for a gas power station in 2009 with the promise of 'we will do our bit, if you do yours'
Businessman Paul Apap Bologna tried selling the gas power station plan to the Nationalist government in 2009 but then secretary-general Paul Borg Olivier turned down the plan.
Four years later, a plan very similar to the one Borg Olivier had been shown, was presented by the Labour Party as part of its energy plan for the 2013 election campaign.
“When one looks at the context of the decision in 2009 and the PL proposal in 2013 at the beginning of the electoral campaign, I felt that the person who came to try and sell the project to me had gone to sell it to Labour. As far as I know it was the same person,” Borg Olivier said.
He was testifying in Wednesday’s session of the Daphne Caruana Galizia public inquiry.
Borg Olivier said Apap Bologna’s proposal in 2009 included the foreign company Gasol and GEM Holdings, which included Maltese family businesses.
“One of the things which leapt out to me during the conversation, was Apap Bologna’s comment: ‘the decision is yours, we will do our bit if you do yours.’ I asked what this was about and was met by silence and a half-smile,” Borg Olivier said.
Asked whether Apap Bologna informed him that he had spoken to some government representative at the time, Borg Olivier answered in the negative.
“No, but the comment about ‘doing your bit’ made me suspicious,” Borg Olivier told the inquiry, implying that the comment may have been a suggestion to donate money to the party.
“From the PN side, at least in my time, the party did not... depend strongly on donations, which required compromises,” Borg Olivier said.
He also testified that at the same time Christian Kalin from Henley and Partners, a citizenship agency, had approached the PN with a proposal for the introduction of a golden passport scheme. “Kalin had presented a document but the party was against the sale of citizenship because it believed in the sovereignty of the state in passport sales,” Borg Olivier said.
Henley and Partners were later awarded a concession by the Labour government to sell Maltese citizenship as part of the Individual Investor Programme.
“I can also say that it is a bit of a misnomer to think of there being big donations. Political parties rely on the little donated by the many, at least in the case of the PN,” Borg Olivier reiterated.
The inquiry also heard the testimony of journalists Caroline Muscat, Monique Agius and Miguela Xuereb, who described incidents of harassment by PL supporters. Muscat said that this tied in with an OPM-orchestrated disinformation campaign. "With the dominance of party media in Malta, there is little that independent journalists can do to counter such a wave of disinformation. When it is mixed with hate-bating of the handful of journalists who work on investigative stories you end up with one side dominating the narrative.”
"Even after her death, the idea that it is OK to insult and speak of aggression and murdering people as a joke has become open and accepted. You see memes with ‘one witch disappears and another one appears’, with my face and government officials saying you need a handful of more bombs,” Muscat recounted.
Background to the inquiry
The inquiry will have to determine whether any wrongful action or omission by or within any State entity could have facilitated the assassination of Caruana Galizia or failed to prevent it, particularly whether the State knew or should have known of risks to the journalist’s life “at the time” of her murder.
It must also consider whether the State not only knew of, but “caused” risks to Caruana Galizia’s life.
Although its terms of reference allow for restrictions on the publication of the inquiry's report, it specifies that the board must provide the family with the opportunity to read the full report, including the redacted parts, without being granted copies of the text underlying any redactions. The family are also prohibited from divulging the redacted content.
The inquiry board, made up of Justice Emeritus Michael Mallia, Chief Justice Emeritus Joseph Said Pullicino and Judge Abigail Lofaro, is bound to present the inquiry report, once it is completed, to the Prime Minister and Attorney General, to notify the public that the inquiry has been concluded and presented to the Prime Minister, and, most notably, to publish the report within eight working days from when it is delivered to the Prime Minister.
The Prime Minister has to table the report in Parliament within five days of receiving it.
The inquiry, which started in December, must be completed within nine months.