Austin Gatt says GRTU demanded Bisazza pedestrianisation in May

'Routes not cast in stone', Transport Minister Austin Gatt says on last-minute change to Arriva bus routes through Bisazza Street.

Transport minister Austin Gatt has said the last-minute change to the pedestrianisation of Bisazza Street in Sliema was brought about after the Chamber of SMEs (GRTU) demanded that the road be closed to all traffic, including the new public transport service.

The street was earmarked for "semi-pedestrianisation" that would allow the passage of some eight bus routes - with a bus passing every five minutes - through the street. But this was later changed to have public transport operators Arriva re-route the buses through Tigné, at an unspecified cost borne by the taxpayer.

Gatt said he did not know what sum Transport Malta had to pay Arriva to change the routes' passage, which were previously part of their contract.

“As far as I know, GRTU was against the full pedestrianisation of Bisazza Street until 19 May, when they came out in favour of it. Government then decided to go for it as well and that led to a number of consequences," Gatt said when asked what had led to the mix-up on the project.

Gatt added that Transport Malta’s view was that Bisazza Street should have been partially pedestrianised: “But the political decision was against the technical decision... As politicians, we had to see whether Bisazza Street was better off fully pedestrianised. In this case we think yes, simple as that.”

The minister today went to inspect ongoing works at the bus interchange in Bugibba.

“We are blowing something totally out of proportion... it is not a major issue at all," he said of the Bisazza Street saga.

Gatt said Transport Malta has similar requests from a number of other councils. “Routes are not cast in stone – they are there to be changed. There’s nothing major about it. Government thought that once Bisazza had been pedestrianised, the change should come now rather than six months later,” he said.

Gatt argued that if a locality like Qrendi decides that no buses should pass from its village square, then the routes should be changed accordingly: “And this is what will keep happening. The good thing is that with Arriva we have a framework in which to discuss a change in routes. Before, with the Public Transport Association it used to take hell and I don’t how many times we needed to discuss things."

On 9 May, Transport Malta engineers submitted a report which expressed preference for a partially pedestrianised Bisazza Street, but it was later directed by government to implement full pedestrianisation. Just a month before, the Ministry for Resources and Rural Affairs -  the ministry that undertook the pedestrianisation project - had asked Transport Malta to consider the complete pedestrianisation of Bisazza Street.

Back in 2009, Transport Malta signed a 10-year contract to operate Malta's bus system which envisioned eight public transport routes passing from Bisazza Street.

avatar
By adjusting slightly the route one presumes that the number of commuters will remain the same. Has anyone in charge of our taxes verified why will Arrina require 17 new buses - not air conditioned - and just 10 extra drivers. If anything the numbers should have been reversed i.e. 10 new buses and 17 drivers. Its the drivers that work on shift and not the buses. No wonder 2 out of 3 in Bisazza Street have lost their head!!!
avatar
Il-HMAR iwahhal f'denbu. What Austin failed to say is that this is a classic case of GROSS MISMANAGEMENT.
avatar
Minister Gatt is absolutely right....bus routes are NOT cast in stone, as practically all things in life. How can one call a street pedestrianised if a bus passes every five minutes? One has to be nuts to call such a street pedestrianised. The usual wisemen of course do not agree. They are worried that any change in bus routes will have a negative effect on our budget deficit, blissfully unaware that Malta's annual budget is around Eur3 billlion. Usually the ones who are most vociferous about public expenditure are the ones who hardly pay any taxes.
avatar
Igor P. Shuvalov
So the Government changes plans according to the whims of the GRTU who suddenly changed its views about Bisazza Street plans and for political exegencies decided to go for full pedestrianization without taking in consideration that this would mean that we taxpayers have to make financially good for these changes. But of course for Minister Gatt “We are blowing something totally out of proportion.." After all a few mistakes here, and a few mistakes there, a few thousand to cover these mistakes, and another few thousands for other mistakes does not make any difference. Ministers could easily do as the Prime Minister and after squandering the taxpayers money, make an apology.. of course without making financially good for their mistakes.
avatar
Louis Galea said 10 million LM here and there what difference does it make Eddie used to say Money no Problem Ausin Gatt says so what we hange routes and we pay Gonzi says Euro 500 a week pay rise is good for memper of parliament we deserve it. And us tax payers come on look ahead be positive so what work and pay but the country is in need. Vote PN again so things never change
avatar
So the additional expenses should be paid by the Chamber of SMEs (GRTU) and not the taxpayer. . Afterall it was the GRTU secretary general and government that spoke so much on the concept of accountability in the late 1990s when it was introduced within the local administraton.
avatar
super gatt izgur ma tohrog ghal elezjioni li geja ghax taf kem tnejikt bnies
avatar
Sur Ministru dejjem trid twahhal fx hadd, int infallibli. Ghax ta tghidx li bil hmerijiet tieghek dejjem jispicca ihallas il poplu