Updated | MSSP confirms Pope defrocks sex abuser…Church apologises

Pope Benedict XVI orders defrockment of convicted sex abuser Fr Charles Pulis, as the Vatican examines the case of Fr Godwin Scerri. The Curia issues an apology following the convictions.

15:30: The Missionary Order of St. Paul (MSSP) has confirmed MaltaToday's revelation in it's Wednesday edition that Pope Benedict XVI has decreed that Fr. Charles Pulis has been defrocked, while a decision of Fr. Godwin Scerri will be taken at the end of this summer.

The MSSP had initially resisted to admit the Papal decree, and Vatican sources told MaltaToday that it was up to the Order to make it public. "The public has a right to know." the sources told MaltaToday.

13:00: The Church expressed its “deep sorrow” at how minors were abused by those in whose care they were placed.

In its statement, the Church also asked for forgiveness for how the abuse took place, primarily from the victims of the abuse, and also from Maltese society at large.

The Church also expressed sorrow over how the investigations into the reports of child abuse took so long to be concluded.

It said that Archbishop Paul Cremona intends to shortly meet once again with the victims of the abuse to request forgiveness from them personally.

The Church also urged anyone with information of cases of abuse to come forward and report the cases immediately.

It also said that it had strengthened its structures so that cases of abuse can be avoided or, if they take place, steps can be taken as soon as possible.

Supplying the statement later on during the day, Curia communications officer Kevin Papagriocopulo informed MaltaToday that the statement was available on the Curia’s website since they were issued.

But despite repeated interactions with both Papagriocopulo and the Curia’s Communication Office throughout the day while trying to obtain the statement, MaltaToday was not informed of the statement’s online availability at any point.

Earlier: Both men are members of the Missionary Order of St Paul, who were yesterday handed down a prison sentence for the serial abuse of 11 boys in their care.

MaltaToday can confirm that the defrockment order was signed last month, and forwarded to the Order’s superiors in Rome and in Malta.

But while Pulis is no longer considered a member of the clergy, there has been no announcement to this effect by the religious order to which he belonged.

Vatican sources have expressed dismay at the fact that the order has not yet publicly communicated the news about Fr Pulis’s defrockment.

“The people have a right to know,” the source said.

The two priests were yesterday sentenced to six and five years’ imprisonment respectively, at the end of an eight-year judicial process in the Maltese courts.

Magistrate Saviour Demicoli found them guilty of a series of abuses on a group of orphaned youths during the 1980s and 1990s at the St Joseph Home in Hamrun.

Through their lawyer Dr Joseph Giglio, they have made it clear that they will appeal the sentence.

The Papal decree regarding Fr Pulis stipulates that he will be permitted to remain within the religious community, however he will no longer serve as a priest but as a brother, “given his age.” As such Pulis can no longer celebrate mass.

With regards to Fr Godwin Scerri, MaltaToday is informed that his file was received at the Vatican some three weeks ago, and is expected to be processed after the summer.

St Paul’s missionary order superior Fr Louis Mallia was not reachable yesterday.

However, the superior at St Agatha’s home, Fr Tony Sciberras, said he was not aware of the Vatican’s decision to defrock Fr Pulis.

“I am sorry to hear this,” Fr Sciberras said, adding that he is also “sorry to hear about the judgment and about the whole case” against his two friends.

“I am indeed very sorry for all that has happened,” he said, adding that one must also respect the fact that both Pulis and Scerri are appealing the judgment.

Pulis and Scerri originally stood charged together with a third clergyman, Brother Joseph Bonnet, who passed away last January aged 63.

The case was made public in 2003, when Lawrence Grech, one of the alleged victims, revealed that he had been sexually abused while an orphan at St Joseph’s Home in Santa Venera in the late 1980s.

Police investigations into allegations of paedophilia by three members of the Missionary Society of St Paul took the country by storm.

Fr Godwin Scerri and Fr Charles Pulis were later charged by the police together with Bro. Bonnet.

They faced accusations by 11 victims, who were aged between 13 and 16 at time of the abuse: all orphans at St Joseph’s Home in Santa Venera in the late 1980s.

Eight of the cases alone took place in St Joseph’s Home, while one took place in the order’s summer residence in Marfa.

Fr Scerri was yesterday jailed for five years following being found guilty of similar charges. He was however acquitted of violent rape charges due to a flaw in the charge sheet, which accused him of raping one of the victims at Marfa, when testimonies revealed that the act had taken place in St Joseph’s Home.

In his sentence, Magistrate Saviour Demicoli referred to a number of testimonies that were delivered over the course of the eight-year trial.

He cited the testimony of a St Joseph’s Home care worker who stumbled upon Pulis and one of the victims, and testified that he had seen Pulis in boxer shorts and an undershirt on a bed, with the victim lying on top of him.

The care worker had also testified that Fr Pulis’s penis was erect and exposed, and how Pulis began talking to the care worker seemingly unaware of this fact. The care worker testified also that Pulis had pushed the victim off him when the care worker had walked in.

The court described Pulis’s behaviour as “highly disgusting” adding that the court noted how this took place over a number of years by a person who was responsible for protecting minors.

The court also said that these children were already under psychological pressure, since they had to be raised in care homes, adding that Pulis’s actions were “of the highest repugnance.”

The court also recalled testimony by another victim, who told the court how Fr Scerri had touched or masturbated him in various instances, either in Marfa, or at the care home, despite how he would ask Fr Scerri to stop.

The victim also testified how Fr Scerri would often also give him sweets and money.

The victim also said that in one instance, he had penetrated him from behind, and that he was sure of this because he felt it. He said that in that instance, Fr Scerri had visited him in his room to gift him with a stereo.

The court noted how the testimony was corroborated by another boy in the house, who had seen them go into the room and had tried calling for the victim to come out repeatedly, but both Fr Scerri and the victim remained silent.

The court also noted that most of the allegations faced by the priests were now prescribed, meaning that the two priests can no longer face charges for their commission.

Magistrate Saviour Demicoli added that most of these would have meant between three to six years of imprisonment had the accused been found guilty of them.

In January 2011, the court upheld a request to ban the publication of the priests’ names, and since then the case was heard behind closed doors.

At the same time, the Church Response Team initiated an investigation.

The victims also skyrocketed to prominence last year when they were able to meet privately with Pope Benedict XVI in April 2010 and had expressed his “shame and sorrow” and promised “effective measures” to protect young people in the future.

Meetings were also later held with Archbishop Paul Cremona and Gozo Bishop Mario Grech.

Following the meeting, the Vatican promised to investigate the case, following criticism of the Curia’s Response Team, which has, to date, not yet concluded investigations, which had been ongoing for seven years.

The victims had also received a letter from the Curia last October and were told that their case would be referred to the Vatican, which in January instructed the Maltese Church to establish a tribunal to investigate.

In the latest development in May, a tribunal member met with the victims to formalise the evidence they gave to the Vatican’s leading sex abuse prosecutor last summer.

avatar
What is so disappointing about this whole issue is the alleged connivance of the Papal See with the whole incidence. The Catholic Church in the USA has put aside US$100 Billion for paying out damages to those affected. Now the Catholic Church in Ireland the UK and across the resto the EU and the Far East and the Rest of the Americas is just awakening up to the fact that millions of Children have suffered the same trauma and sexual abuses as reported here. The Catholic Church is not above the Law and all those involved (even if it reaches the higher offices of the Catholic Church) must be subject to the Law. This is despicable and it must be fully dealt with. The ideas that time has passed and therefore prosecutions cannot take place: sorry but if that was the case then recent trials of Holocaust perpertartors were wrong. This is phooey and total nonsense. The Churches must pay up and have a root and branch sort out of these issues. We have been taught to trust the Churches and their Officials from a young age and now we cannot. Is it any wonder that the younger members of our Society are becoming so estranged from the Church?
avatar
If the church truly believes in the apology it has made, its tribunal should have long ago decided on the case and not slept on it with no remedy provided for the victims!
avatar
Did the church know about Scerri's alleged previous sex exploits and what did they do about it? Hide him in another diocese?
avatar
To little to late. Doesn't the Church understand that this is just one of the incidents that is rotting it's foundations. If the Church wants to survive it has to change it's views and attitudes. It has to forget the bigotry and deep rooted hatred and start practicing the proper teachings of Christ our Lord. First and foremost: LOVE THY ENEMY AS THYSELF.
avatar
A lot speak but do not understand. . I was about 9 or 10 years old when someone tried to abuse me. He was not a priest but an ordinary married man from Sliema. Lucky for me I could avoid him and always kept away from him for the fact that I changed my walking route to school. Yet to-day even after so many years it still traumatise me as if it happened yesterday and only because nowadays he is dead, for if he was still around I would go and face him, not with court but with my own hands. . These who have committed these grievous activities should be punished even harder than 11 years in prison but should be locked away for good. I sincerely hope that in their appeal the new sentence will be at least doubled and not softened.
avatar
Was the apology embargoed?
avatar
U KEMM GHAMLU QABEL , U JEKK XI TIFEL KIEN IMUR JGHID LILL OMMU KIEN JAQLA XEBGHA MINN GHANDA GHAX JITKELLEM, JEW TITKELLEM HI KIENU JISPICCAW FRANKUNI. DAWN KIEN IHASSRULEK HAJTEK
avatar
@Maltatoday - I think MT should start considering having their news stories built in the form of the 'guardian'; where the main news story goes on top and minor (but related to that particular news story) beneath it with bullets. In this way you can also start including comments. Otherwise, you would need to updated continously and looks a bit untidy.
avatar
@orion rst hafna insinwazzjonijiet ahjar tghid qattx messek xi hadd. Jien dejjem hemm kont u qatt hadd ma messni, tawni l-privat b'xejn u kont inkun hemm granet shah.
avatar
@follower In fact the judge did say that the charge dropped against one of the priests can be renewed under different wording.
avatar
About time, indeed. Now in another english paper the defrockment was denied..... The Church needs to apologise for the delayed action it took, the unreasonable stands it took on divorce and the utter silence it is exhibiting in the cohabitation bill. Quo Vadis Church????
avatar
Jaqbadni d-dahk meta jigi xi hadd jghidli ma tistax taqta linja minhabba il-ftit hziena. "The Papal decree regarding Fr Pulis stipulates that he will be permitted to remain within the religious community, however he will no longer serve as a priest but as a brother, “given his age.” As such Pulis can no longer celebrate mass." "“I am sorry to hear this,” Fr Sciberras said, adding that he is also “sorry to hear about the judgment and about the whole case” against his two friends." Min ibabas u min joghlli t-tarka u jiddefendi. Ara kif jista jkun dawn is-snin kollha ta abbuzi ma jkunux jafu shabhom
avatar
Issa l-apologija tal-kurja? Mhux ahjar tikxfu li ghad baqa. Min kien imur skola St Agatha kollha konna ninnutawhom dawn il-porkeriji... hafna karezzi ma xi studenti partikulari li jkunu misthijin u kwieti. Issa kie hemm min miet u kien hemm min sparixxa mill-pajjiz ukoll!
avatar
' Religious Order - It should read 'Religious DISORDER' And it has been so since forever. Laqwa li, 'LE GHAD-DIVORZJU' Mhux hekk sur isqof !Le ghal dawn il kwalita ta [nies] li jiena insejjah oggetti.
avatar
So this is our justice, a justice that leans heavily in favor of the criminal. . 5 & 6 years for ruining the lives of children that they were obliged to protect. . A criminal acquitted because somebody made the minor mistake of declaring that the crime took place in Marfa while the crime was committed in St.Joseph's Home. . Allegation that cannot be faced because they are prescribed by time. . I ask the readers if they are satisfied with our justice. Seems like justice is truly blind because it is closing both her eyes to crimes committed. Letting criminals clutch to technical flaws in our laws so they are acquitted even though it is quite clear that they are guilty. . IS THIS THE JUSTICE WE SEEK IN OUR LAND? . And what about the church. Dragging its feet to seek justice and protect the innocent. Smells like they preferred a cover up than fix up. . Instead of purging the clergy of these moles and assured itself that these activities stopped once and for all, they used a strategy were they played for time, and they succeeded in some instances. . IS THIS THE CHURCH WE SHOULD LOOK UP TO? .
avatar
Reuben Sciberras
Let us hope that all the vile actions will come to light. Wher is the curia now. How much money is it spending to hide all its skeletons. Another Euros 250,000!!!!!!!! Some members of the clergy are already treating these two monsters as if they were the victims.
avatar
And how many other people who knew about all this and never did anything to stop it are still getting off scot free?
avatar
One of the priests was acquitted because of an error in the charge sheet. Who is responsible for this? The Commissioner of Police? And why such a serious case was not sent to be tried by a jury? Who is responsible for this? The Attorney General? C. Mifsud Bonnici must resign.
avatar
Hope they rot in jail.