The Church’s silence on sex abuse cases
Sexual abuse of minors is a despicable act, but when it occurs at the hand of those from a religious background who represent high moral standards, the act becomes even more deplorable.
The Church handles situations of abuse using its own rules and procedures, and these are kept confidential within the secret Curial archives in accordance with Canon Law, and never reported to the police authorities.
Father Paul Galea was part of the initial task force that set out the guidelines which were to become procedure in cases where sexual abuse allegations were made. He explains that the confidentiality is insisted upon mainly to protect the victims of abuse, despite the public perception which suggests that it is simply a ploy for the Church to protect its own.
Also a psychologist, Fr Galea said that 99% of victims who have undergone sexual abuse do not want the media exposure that a criminal court case would involve, and instead choose to report the incident to the Church’s Response Team. “What the victim is looking for is to stop the perpetrator from repeating his offence.”
The Delegate and Response Team for the Investigation of sexual abuses was set up in 1999 in order to carry out preliminary investigations of sexual abuses by pastoral ministers – these include not only priests, but anyone falling under the responsibility of the Church who has access to children – including headmasters, teachers and cleaners, among others.
The team gathers all information related to the case, and if there is evidence that such abuse has taken place, conclusions of the case – along with recommendations – are passed on the competent church authorities.
“Confidentiality is key in these investigations. Even the fact that a person is being investigated is confidential, the intention being that victims of abuse receive the utmost privacy.
“We are not after blood. What we aim for is that abusive situations are stopped as soon as possible.”
A police investigation may take a long period of time to complete, during which abuse may carry on. The Church’s Response Team may advise the Ecclesiastical Authority, at any stage of the investigation, without implying guilt or innocence of the accused, to remove the accused from a position where they would have access to minors, allowing for an immediate response to the situation.
“It is very difficult to gather the appropriate evidence, as it is very easy to make accusations. However, when it comes to revealing the identity of themselves or others involved, then many of the accusers back out, so there is no hard evidence. Using the Response Team’s recommendations, a person who may be involved in an abuse case is removed from the proximity of children right away,” Galea said.
If the reports are deemed plausible by the Church’s Response Team, then Ecclesiastical Authority will terminate employment if this exists. If a cleric is involved, the case has to go through Canon Law, whereby the Vatican organises a penal trial and, if sufficient evidence is presented, organises an appropriate punishment.
Galea said that this involves a much more stringent procedure than that offered by the courts as in a court case there must be evidence of criminal activity. During a penal trial sexual misconduct, which is not necessarily criminal is also punishable.
When asked if the Church felt morally obliged to inform the police authorities of sexual crimes committed against minors, Galea warned that pushing victims to make their darkest moments public would only serve to push the abuse cases underground. “A number of victims only come out and make their case known if they are sure that they will not be named. Victor Caruana Colombo, Chairman of the Church’s Response Team, always informs victims of their right to take their case to the police, though emphasises that is a right not a duty – confidentiality has to be at the prerogative of the victim.”
This sentiment is echoed by lawyer Partick Valentino, who is representing the sexual abuse victims of St Joseph’s Home in Malta’s first criminal trial involving sexual abuse at the hand of Church representatives. “The victims are free to report their case to the police. Using the Church’s Response Team does not exclude victims from filing criminal charges against their abusers.”
While Galea is determined to put a stop to anyone found guilty of abusing minors he is also very careful with accusations. “It is very easy to make false accusations involving sexual misconduct with minors, and even if these prove to be unfounded the lives of the accused persons are forever tarnished. Confidentiality is important from all aspects of the cases involved.”
Social worker Anthony Girard agrees that in a community with strong Catholic ties, victims of abuse would often rather seek help from the Church rather than go to the police to report the crime “the victim often feels safer and possibly feels less shame as there is a feeling of confidentiality and trust, like talking about it within the family”.
When abuse occurs at the hand of the Church itself Girard suggests that this also has to do with the psyche of the victim. “It is strange but, in many cases even when victim has suffered at the hand of the Church they still often choose to report their crime to the Church’s Response Team. Very much like the murderer who returns to the scene of the crime, the abused person sometimes returns to the place, especially if this is an Institution like a care home where, notwithstanding the horrific experience, there were also many episodes of caring and love, in the knowledge that the abuse will not happen again, to ease the pain of the past and to obtain final closure.”
However Girard feels that it is important for the Church to report such incidents to the police authorities so that the perpetrator may be brought to justice. “We have seen recently that when this was not the case, justice was delayed for a long, long time, and justice delayed is justice denied.”

