Doors flung open to Constitutional changes

President George Abela is set to kick-off the national debate on changes to the Constitution next April, as calls for reform have gained momentum over the past few weeks, and both government and the opposition are expressing ‘readiness’ to move forward.

While Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi has reiterated his call to the Opposition to return to the Parliamentary Select Committee in a bid to discuss “matters of national importance, including changes to the Constitution,” Labour leader Joseph Muscat said that he is “envisaging a Constitutional Convention that would give birth to a Second Republic.”

But while Labour remained non-committal on its participation within the Parliamentary Select Committee, President Abela has seemingly taken the bull by the horns this week by politely ‘inviting’ Labour to return to the Parliamentary Select Committee.

“It is high time that the Select Committee on Constitutional reform and strengthening of democracy reconvenes,” Abela said when visiting the Broadcasting Authority last Wednesday.

But he also went a step forward later in the week to reveal with MaltaToday that he will convene the President’s Forum in April and initiate the debate on changes to the Constitution and institutional reforms.

A spokesman for the Presidency told MaltaToday that the President “may exercise the role of a prime mover to stimulate discussion on a number of Constitutional and institutional issues that many believe should be addressed.”

Senior aides at the Palace described President Abela as “keenly supporting” calls for changes in the Constitution, and is set to involve the political parties, constituted bodies, social partners, the media and the general public in the national debate.

The Union Haddiema Maghqudin has also joined the foray calling for Constitutional changes, and will launch a document later this month detailing the changes (see overleaf).

Over the past weeks, President Abela reportedly received individual MPs from both sides of the House and informally discussed the changes envisaged for the Constitution and reforms to national institutions.

The Presidency refused to comment about these meetings, but sources have confirmed that similar talks have been held with Deputy Prime Minister Tonio Borg, who is also Leader of the House.

Among the changes which are being envisaged to launch the ‘Second Republic’ are the method of appointment of the President of the Republic.

According to Nationalist backbencher and prime promoter of the changes within the government bench, changes to the method of appointing the President is the “mother of all amendments.”

At present, the highest Office of State is appointed by a simple resolution of the House. A method which Debono considers as “highly inadequate” and is calling for a two-thirds majority vote in Parliament to reflect national consensus. In the absence of a two-thirds, an absolute majority would suffice to avoid Constitutional deadlock.

MaltaToday is informed that talks have meanwhile started towards reforming Parliament, granting its long-awaited autonomy from government, and more accountability from Ministers and MPs to the House.

Speaker Michael Frendo who has so far not been involved in the talks, welcomed the move and considers the news as an “important development in Malta’s democracy.”

Speaking to MaltaToday, Frendo reiterated his stand that parliament needs autonomy to guarantee the balance of powers between the executive, the legislature and the judiciary.

The Speaker expressed his wish to see the new parliament, currently being built near City Gate in Valletta, to have the right “soul” and start operating as an autonomous entity.

Alternattiva Demokratika – the Green Party – has welcomed the recent developments, and expressed its willingness to participate in the national discussion.

“If a specific proposal is made public, AD will comment after discussing it internally,” said AD’s home affairs spokesman Carmel Cacopardo, who added that his party had submitted proposals some three years ago to the Parliamentary Select Committee.”

Malta’s Constitution will soon be 50 years old and has been substantially amended twice: in 1974 and in 1987. Subsequent amendments revisited the 1987 amendements.

MP Franco Debono insists that should the country not embark on a serious discussion regarding essential constitutional reforms now.

“I wonder where our democracy will be in 20 years’ time,” Debono said.

He added people are not greater than the institutions they occupy, and stressed on the dangers to have a parliamentary system, being run on Presidential lines, without the Presidential safeguards and separation of powers.

The presidential system is based on strict separation of powers between legislature, executive and judiciary. Within a Parliamentary model there is no watertight separation between legislature and the executive, but rather ‘checks and balances’, where separation of powers are diluted.

“Besides separation of powers, the Constitution must provide for a balance of power between three organs of the state, and none should be able to ride roughshod over the others,” Debono said.

The independence of the judiciary is safeguarded in both systems. However the method of appointment to judicature could also impinge on the independence of the judiciary.

One of the major problems today is that the country’s democracy is run on a model of a strong executive and a weak parliament due to lack of resources, communication facilities, lack of autonomy, and outdated standing orders.

The list of changes goes on to include changes to the appointments of the boards and roles of the Electoral Commission, and the Broadcasting Authority, while changes to the electoral system is also on the cards.

While a draft law on party financing has finally been completed and will be published as a White Paper in the coming weeks, Debono has meanwhile managed to secure another important novelty to the House, as Parliamentary Committees will now be broadcast via webcam.

The move is intended to serve as a better means of communicating with the electorate and an experiment for future broadcasts of plenary sessions.

This article appeared on the Sunday edition of MaltaToday

avatar
Brave words indeed but which will hardly find the support of either one of the major parties. Changing our electoral system to allow a 5% threshold for any party to be represented in parliament will be a start and the rest will inevitably follow including the transparency of party financing. Something else to look forward to is that it will cut down on arrogant politics and force any possible coalition to tread more carefully in the handling of sensitive matter of national interest.
avatar
@Martin Borg You forgot the Arab American Institute ... it ain't nice to 'discriminate'.
avatar
@alex What makes you think your system would be any better, look at the USA did it prevent the lobbies from dictating to the President? For example, the Jewish Lobby, the gun lobby,the oil companies lobby etc etc. Do you believe that presidents are not human like the rest but demi gods who don't falter?
avatar
How about starting from basics, ie, let's see how the parties are funded and make it constitutional for political parties to report every eurocent they recieve and not start at the Lm20,000 threshold(had to use the Lm as that was the last time anything was mentioned).
avatar
Alex Grech
True constitutional reforms will never be delivered by the present political class. The present constitution is a safeguard for their own interest! We need a constitutional reform that mainly sees: •the government shrink its size and influence over the people •a parliament of not over than 20 deputies •making it easier for the people to call referendums •local councils turned into regional councils with more responsibilities •a President elected by the people, whose responsibilities is not wasting time on l-Strina and il-Festival tac-Citru, but to govern with his own cabinet and deliver the changes the country is so desperate for. Changes that will never be delivered by the present system due to pitiful political implications Anything other than this would be simply a waste of time and a continuation of the superficial reforms we’re seeing right now!
avatar
@ I M Schreck Reading your other blogs then I think I got you wrong. Then, please accept my apologies.
avatar
@I M Schreck I totally agree. But then I have my reservations. Time for the President to put things right for the benefit of the whole Nation. Then, he would certainly walk tall and cast off all past doubts. As they say the proof of the pudding is in the eating! Go for it.
avatar
Note to the President. Keep yourself and the office you represent above partisan politics. Some worry about your past and not so past connections with the labour party whilst others worry about your "obligations'' towards the present administration and your personal clossness to Gonzi himself. Prove all the above pre-occupations as baseless. Push for the changes which are necessary for our country's economic growth and further democratic development and enrichment. And if your interventions help in bringing a genuine and fair solution for the whole nation and not for some particular political party, you will definitely find the whole nation behind you.
avatar
Interestingly this comes a day after the bishops claimed that they did not need any political or cultural support..... However it is more like damage limitation before potentially getting kicked out of office.
avatar
what about introducing a pluralistic democracy instead of the "partyocracy" which has suffocated this island for the past 40 years. What about banning political parties from exasperating their voters through their own TV and radio stations. We need true proportinal representation not the clientelistic single transferable vote system. BUT most voters will object to this change because clientelism suits them MORE than the politicians!
avatar
@ Maltabiss- the point of the constitution is thatit can be re-written to suit the country when the situation changes, unile the 10 commandements it is not beign a traitor when people try to change it bythe way illegal immigrants and EU powers are covered by international treaty and not by the constitution ..
avatar
Don't anyone dare think of touching the neutrality clause and try to make way for PfP and other organizations membership such as NATO or even think of giving a military base or allowing Malta to be used militarily. ** The same goes if anything is done to allow the illegal immigrants to stay in Malta or to give any more power to the European Union or continue in EU membership if it turns into a Federal State as was always the intention of its creators. ** Anyone who does so shall never get our vote and shall be considered as a Quisling, a traitor of Malta and the Maltese people and in the pay of foreigners.
avatar
Il-Austin 'Sleeping Beauty' Gatt is involved, nothing will happen, he controls the PN machine and electoral process. He will never allow any changes that would harm the PNs interests or chances of re-election. Lil mini tafu tistaqsix ghalih.
avatar
The Constitution is for the Maltese Nation. I hope that the Democracy the parties speak about will come into effect by giving the people rthe right to vote for or against? and this time the will of the people is honoured by one and ALL
avatar
When the UHM joins in the foray I begin to ask whether there is something fishy. Why all this sudden importance NOW? Why not bear pressure on the government to change the identity cards which have expired 4 years ago!