Vatican absolves fourth priest in St Joseph Home child sex abuse

The fourth priest in the St Joseph Home child sex abuse is having his ministry restricted to be with persons of adult age, because no “moral certainty” exists that he abused minors under his care.

The Vatican’s congregation for the doctrine of the faith said it had confirmed the decision of the penal administrative process on the accusations against Fr Conrad Sciberras, saying that “since moral certainty has not been attained that Fr Conrad Sciberras is being found guilty of having   sexually abused a number of minors in the terms of current Jurisprudence”, a negative decision was given as to whether Fr Conrad Sciberras sexually abused minors.

Instead the Vatican decided that since evidence “gives rise to serious suspicions”, Sciberras is having his ministry restricted to be with persons of adult age.

Fr Conrad Sciberras of the Missionary Society of St Paul is accused of having sexually molested the victims of the St Joseph Home run by the order, but has constantly denied the allegations.

Victims of abuse at the home for boys had made claims against Fr Sciberras and other members of the MSSP – Charles Pulis, Godwin Scerri and Joseph Bonett.
But he was not charged of any crime, while Pulis and Scerri were jailed for six and five years respectively, although they are currently out on appeal. Fr Bonett died earlier this year, before proceedings against him were concluded.

The victims of the MSSP sex abuse asked the Maltese church to take action against Fr Conrad Sciberras. A decree was issued by the Curia’s Administrative Tribunal on 15 July, absolving Sciberras.

avatar
Luke Camilleri
"Moral" ? I call it more Abuse!
avatar
How can anyone be "absolved" when there are "serious suspicions"? It's either one or the other. If there are serious suspicions and the priest is to be given work which does not involve children, then actually what can be called preventative action is being taken and there is no absolution per se.
avatar
“since evidence gives rise to serious suspicions”. Can somebody please explain in plain language what this exactly means? Since Fr Conrad’s superiors have ordered him not to work with children, are we to assume they are afraid to trust him near children? The key question is: Can parents trust their children with Fr Conrad? A simple YES or NO from the Curia should be enough.
avatar
Well, there is no moral certainty that Jesus rose up from death, either.