No agreement on Richard Cachia Caruana grilling

The government and the Opposition fail to reach an agreement on how the motion calling for the resignation of Malta's Permanent Representative to the EU should be discussed.

Foreign Minister Tonio Borg and Permanent Representative to the EU Richard Cachia Caruana.
Foreign Minister Tonio Borg and Permanent Representative to the EU Richard Cachia Caruana.

The European and Foreign Affairs committee presided by government MP Francis Zammit Dimech saw both sides of the House involved in a heated debate over the Opposition's motion calling for the resignation of  Richard Cachia Caruana resignation, following his 'behind-the-scenes' role in bringing Malta into Nato's Partnership for Peace in 2008 and bypassing the parliamentary procedure for this decision.

The meeting was adjourned to another day after the Opposition asked for a ruling by Speaker of the House Michael Frendo. The Opposition whip, who does not sit on the committee but has an institutional right to participate in Parliamentary committee meetings without having a right to vote, intervened after the two sides could not come to an agreement on how the committee should debate the Opposition's motion.

Foreign Minister Tonio Borg informed the committee that the government side wants to invite a list of 21 witnesses to give evidence before the committee. The list includes Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker, former Nato Secretary General Javier Solana and two former US ambassadors to Malta.

Borg insisted that the prime minister should be the first to give evidence, in order to explain the context of the PfP membership and also to explain how Malta's representatives used to be asked to leave meetings when Nato documents were discussed.

However the Opposition insisted that Cachia Caruana should be the first to give evidence. While the Opposition did not oppose the list of witnesses, former Labour foreign minister George Vella pointed out that Cachia Caruana should be the first to appear before the committee because the motion is calling for his resignation. He added that other witnesses shall give evidence "in due time".

After a lengthy and heated exchange between Borg and the Opposition members over this matter, Borg proposed that the committee should be adjourned to tomorrow. At that point Zammit Dimech said the matter should be put to the vote.

Vella agreed, as long as the vote is taken in the main Chamber and not in the committee. As both sides could not reach an agreement, Labour whip Joe Mizzi intervened and said he would request a ruling from the Speaker.

The fiery debate was carried over to the Chamber, with Mizzi insisting that the committee had no right to take a vote.

The Speaker, Michael Frendo, who is included in the list of witnesses propsed by the government, said he would give a ruling at another sitting. The committee was then adjourned pending the ruling of the Speaker.

Borg took the lead in a similar fashion to the House Business Committee meeting which discussed the Parliament's agenda two weeks ago. Then Borg had led the discussion instead of the leader of the house, Carm Mifsud Bonnici, who was the subject of one of the Opposition's motions discussed by the committee. Once again Borg did all the talking with the other five government MPs remaining silent throughout the meeting.

Nationalist MP Beppe Fenech Adami and his colleagues even had time to leaf through a magazine while Tonio Borg was single-handidley spearheading the government's attempt to avoid Cachia Caruana being grilled by the committee at the earliest stage possible.

Opposition MP Leo Brincat accused Borg of hijacking the meeting and having a conflict of interest as foreign minister, saying Borg was only present to defend Cachia Caruana. He added "this is an act of intolerable gate-keeping to defend Mr Untouchable as had happened in the Dar Malta fiasco."

Another committee member representing the Opposition, Owen Bonnici said Borg represents the executive while the committee's function is to scrutinise the executive, so the minister's presence represented a conflict of interest.

At one point Nationalist MP Franco Debono, who in the past has been critical of Cachia Caruana, was seen walking by the room where the committee meeting was being held and was overheard asking whether Malta's representative to the EU was present. 

avatar
When one remembers how Lawrence Gonzi was so quick to get rid of John Dalli - ON A FALSE REPORT (!)- and compare it to what they are doing to save Richard Cachia Caruana, one comes easily to the conclusion, that what Franco Debono and the PL are saying, that RCC is the REAL prime minister and not Lawrence Gonzi !
avatar
@thorny.....Did you mention Dr,Franco Debono ???well he is vanished after he voted for something he does not believe in,,,
avatar
The way that these people in Govt are takeing the country for a ride is shameful. The dictatorial manner in all they do is becoming scary. These people are soooo scared of losing the elctions becuase the good lord knows what dirt will be found in their drawers- if they leave anything behind ie! The way they are treating this business of RCC shows 3 things 1). they know he is in the wrong. RCC shoul have never have bypassed parliament....but then RCC knows that he is above parliament!! 2). they are being held hostage by a powerful man who is dictating his own rules and terms in his own trial 3), the poor idiots are helpless and have to do what this man - unelected and unapproved by th electorate- wants,irrespective of the consequences to democracy. We are living in a DICTATORSHIP and this county is resembling more and more a 3rd world african country - a result of incompetent politicians who re so attached to power and addicted to glory that they will go to any lengths to protect the status quo. RCC is a monster of thei shameful system and the resul of weak people whose only ' redeeming ' trait is their arrogance and their complete disregard for what is the national interest. This situation is intolerable in any decent civilised country. What a shameful lot you are.
avatar
Qatt daqs din il legistratura, specjalment din l-ahhar sena ma irredikulajtu l-ghola istuzzjoni tal pajjiz..IL PARLAMENT u waqqajtuh ghaz zufjett...misskhom tisthu.Dr. Tonio Borg, tkunx aktar anti demokratiku. Il pajjiz mhux tieghek u ftakar li erbgha t`ijiem ohra fadallek tikkummiedja. Dr. Franco Debono, tibqax iddahhaq u dak li ghandek tghamel ghamlu, ghax ser tispicca f`xi Cirklu.
avatar
When you elect Monkeys as MP’s And appoint Chimpanzees in Brussels. Is it any wonder that this Banana Republic of Malta Has turned into jungle. Order more bananas please.
avatar
Luke Camilleri
All hands on deck- SAVE THE OLIGARCHY! Anyone seen Dr. Franco Debono lately.... or has he gone into hibernation or a three month cruise to return back after the Summer recess?
avatar
In my humble opinion I believe that the Hon Tonio Borg might have a conflict of interest as he is "supposed" to be the boss of the Perm Rep in Brussels. Hence he should not be on this committee let alone trying hard to take a leading role. Will MFA pls tell us commoners whether it is the norm for a Representative (Amb, High Commissioner or Perm Rep) to remain in post for eight years. Is this in the national interest? According to my friends at MFA they claim that rotation (max 3-4years) is healthy otherwise the rep will become local.