Chief Justice irked by probing questions on court delays

Silvio Camilleri dubs Times reports into long-standing issue of court delays ‘appalling’

Silvio Camilleri said he refused to cooperate with “deplorable sensation-seeking tabloid reporting” after he was asked about the problem with court delays.
Silvio Camilleri said he refused to cooperate with “deplorable sensation-seeking tabloid reporting” after he was asked about the problem with court delays.

Chief Justice Silvio Camilleri issued a scathing comment on the reporting of The Times, after he refused to answer questions on court delays brought to national attention by comments from Magistrate Carol Peralta, calling the newspaper's campaign "appalling".

Camilleri, a former attorney general, told The Times he would not cooperate with their queries and took issue with some court reports that painted the judiciary in a negative light.

"I refuse to cooperate with, and thereby encourage by answering your queries, the kind of deplorable sensation-seeking tabloid reporting which The Times of Malta has been resorting to as of late in connection with judicial events," Camilleri wrote to the newspaper.

"I am disappointed that I had to spell out the message, which my silence to date was meant to convey."

Camilleri accused the newspaper of putting too much weight on the "frustrations of a magistrate who has been to Bosnia-Herzegovina" - referring to Peralta's comments on the absence of a prosecuting officer during one of his sittings - which remarks he said "have been repeatedly uttered by magistrates from time to time".

Displaying a degree of contempt for the way the newspaper was carrying out its reporting duties, Camilleri took issue with the fact that a photo of magistrate Marseann Farrugia was splashed "like a mugshot of a criminal" because her order to revoke bail was declared illegal by another magistrate.

An even harsher judgement was that made of the newspaper's court reporter, whom Camilleri said "seems to labour under the delusion that whatever happens outside his earshot has simply not happened."

The issue of court delays was raised by Magistrate Carol Peralta, who upon returning from the Kosovo war crimes tribunal, condemned delays caused by no-shows during the sittings.

While Peralta hit out at the "disgrace" of court delays as he took to the Bench for his first sitting in a Maltese court in eight years, it turned out that he had left 283 pending magisterial inquiries when he was appointed in 2005 as an international judge presiding over war crime trials in Kosovo.

While Peralta's complaints were given much prominence in The Times, highlighting the unnecessary delays in the Maltese courts, it turns out that magistrate Peralta was never partial to have his own caseload revealed in the House of Representatives.

Indeed in 2001, then justice minister Austin Gatt told the House that Peralta was one of several magistrates refusing to have his pending caseload of magisterial inquires publicised in the House - something Gatt had publicly criticised.

In comments he gave on breakfast show TVAM, Peralta said it was "physically impossible" for him to deal with the pending inquiry caseload, because these inquiries were pending further compilation by court experts.

avatar
Balzan.....in nanna kienet tghid il huta min rasa tinten !!!!!!!!
avatar
Hawn ta' min jaghti taghrif importanti biex il-poplu jiggudika il-mod kif tahdem il-gudikatura f'pajjizna. Dawn huma nies li jahdmu biss ftit sieghat filghodu - forsi sas-siegha ta' wara nofs in-nhar u mhux aktar - u mbaghad idabbru rashom u jhallu l-awli tal-qorti vojta biex (taparsi) joqoghdu jaghmlu r-ricerka dwar is-sentenzi u jiktbu dawn is-sentenzi !!! U nahseb li kulhadd jemminhom li hekk ikunu qed jaghmlu, l-izjed meta tarahom jigri 'l hawn u 'l hemm u jhallu s-sentenzi jiktbuhomlhom l-assistenti gudizzjarji !!!! U xi nghidu mbaghad ghall-pagi li ghandhom u l-aktar il-perks li ghandhom u li ghalihom inhallsu ahna - linja tat-telephone d-dar, mobile, karozza bi driver ghalihom, ghas-sinjura u ghat-tfal u n-namrati taghhom, il-cable television, allowances, etc. Mhux ghalhekk dan l-ahhar smajna li sentenza dwar il-BOV ghadha pendenti wara 37 sena; il-kawza tas-supemarket fejn waqghu l-ixkaffi nqatghet wara 22 sena; u l-iskandlu tad-dipartiment tal-farmacija fl-universita nqata' wata xi 20 sena !!! Dik efficjenza tarax !!! L-AGHAR HAGA HI LI MBAGHAD TISMA' LI Z-ZEWG NAHAT TAL-KAMRA QABLU LI DAWN GHANDHOM JINGHATAW ZIEDA FIL-PAGA!!!! Tghid mhux hekk nibqghu !!!
avatar
@ Leon Scerri >> Agreed 100% with your comment. No one is above the law and suspicion, seeing this is Malta we are talking about; and the power of incumbency is known for its ferocious exercising. Every citizen, especially those paid from public funds, should be accountable to Joe Public and/or his representatives.
avatar
anna calleja
This outburst by the Chief Justice is disturbing; fitting to a prima donna not to the dean overseeing the Administration of Justice in our islands. My dictionary defines a prima donna as ‘a temperamental person; a person who takes adulation and privileged treatment as a right and reacts with petulance to criticism or inconvenience.’Very fitting indeed. The media is playing a very important and singular part in restraining the excesses of some members of the judiciary by publicising doubtful decisions and goings on in the corridors of justice. Who can deny that the administration of justice has gone from bad to worst over the past decades. In truly democratic countries, even presidents have been held accountable and jailed for their shortcomings; but here in Malta one cannot even vent his worries in the papers about serious maladministration of justice. A spring cleaning is needed in our society.. This can only be achieved by opening up all our institutions, without any exception, for a thorough investigation