Power station has to change fuel by 2020

Up to €220 million could be spent in ensuring Delimara uses fuel that enables lower carbon emissions.

The Delimara power plant
The Delimara power plant

A European Union directive which stipulates lower carbon emission levels that Malta must abide to and ratify, binds the government to find a cleaner alternative to Heavy Fuel Oil by 2020.
Finding an alternative to the fuel currently powering the Delimara power station's new extension must be achieved at a cost of up to €220 million, depending on the technology used.

The new directive would reverse the government's decision in November 2007 to lower emission levels and use HFO, as long as it conformed to the then-existing EU emission limits. This decision was instrumental in the choice of Danish firm BWSC as the suppliers of the new Delimara extension.

A public consultation document recently issued by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority, says that the Industrial Emissions Directive must be transposed by January 2013.

But Malta managed to obtain an exemption from the law's limit values until 2020, instead of 2016.

An impact assessment carried out by Ernst & Young in 2008 identified the lowering of emission limit values for large combustion plants, such as Delimara, as the main impact arising from this law.

"Given that Malta managed to obtain an exemption from these limit values until 2020 (instead of 2016), costs were estimated at between €64 million and €220 million depending upon the technology which will be found to be feasible to implement in order to achieve these emission limits," E&Y says in the report.

The cost is considered to be substantial relative to the economy, ranging between 1.1% and 3.9% of GDP for 2008.

The choice of technology has not yet been communicated to MEPA by Enemalta, the national energy corporation, and it is possible that expenses will be different to those estimated if Enemalta limits the operating time of the boilers and gas turbines at Delimara Power Station after 2020.

According to the report the expense could indirectly impact small businesses, if electricity tariffs are raised to recover costs.

avatar
There should be no prescription from criminal acts carried out by politicians and/or their lackeys in power.
avatar
"But Malta managed to obtain an exemption from the law's limit values until 2020, instead of 2016." Thanks Eu and maybe tahnks to RCC ..but would EU also excempt our lungs from the damage that will happen until 2012. If heavy fuel oil is not good in 2012 than it is not good today!
avatar
I expect that those responsible for this waste of Maltese Taxpayer's money should be brought to book and prosectued. Those in the Civil Service that screw just the smallest amount were all prosecuted and we should do the same for MO, Ministers and those responsible. MPs shouldn't hold and "immunity", otherwise the will abuse. Justice for one and ALL.
avatar
No one will convince me that the BWSC saga wasn't about kick backs and pocketting money. Hope that the time will come when he who was in line for €4 million in commissions would have to spill out his guts about what was really behind the contract.Who got what and where it ended up.
avatar
Veru haqqu prosit GonziPn!! €220 million down the drain from tax payer's money and than some voters say but is the Louber Party good enough and is it really a good alternative Government?The PL has been saying this from the begining. But Gonzi did not eant to hear or listen. The billboard with Gonzi closing his eyes and ears is not enough!And yes PL is muche better than PN and this is an other proof
avatar
Luke Camilleri
GET THE YELLOW PAGES OUT! @ 2% commission, that would be quite a sum for some commissioned agent like the more than €4 million commision paid to Joe Mizzi JUST FOR LOOKING THROUGH THE yELLOW PAGES AND FIND A CONTRACTOR!