IVF | PM supports embryo freezing ban, ‘values are part of Malta’s DNA’

Prime Minister proposes 24-hour timeframe in which government and opposition analyse proposed amendments before entering committee stage.

Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi.
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi.

Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi this evening said that moral values formed part of the country's DNA. Addressing the debate over the Embryo Protection Bill, Gonzi reiterated that the primary aim of the bill was to protect the embryo.

"I know that it took us years to arrive where we are today. But during these years we listened to consultants, followed the technology and held discussions with all stakeholders. Because above all, we always wanted to protect the embryo," he said.

Both government and opposition have endorsed the banning of embryo freezing. The Prime Minister said that oocyte vitrification was the answer to this moral dilemma.

 "Protecting the embryo represents who we are, our values. We respect human life: we believe in protecting life from the very beginning, even before the birth of the baby," he said.

"These values are part of our country's DNA."

Gonzi said he was satisfied that the bill was not subject to controversy by both sides of the House.

"As legislators, we have the duty to see that the correct laws are applied. As government we have the duty to see that everyone is given the right to build a family," Gonzi said.

He added that it was unfair that there were couples who couldn't have children because they didn't afford to pay for the treatment. "As government we have the duty to provide for them as well. We won't hinder the work carried it out by the private sector, but at the same time we cannot abandon these families."

Gonzi said that the bill's aim was to regulate issues which today weren't regulated. "For example, there is nothing in the Maltese law that stops cloning today. With this law, this will become illegal, just like it will become illegal to use embryos for experimentation or making use of surrogate mothers," he said.

The prime minister conceded that the five-man committee that will regulate recipients of IVF shouldn't act as a big brother. "While I agree that this authority should do away with excessive red tape and shouldn't over regulate, yet we shouldn't allow any leniency that could either endanger the mother or the baby," he said.

He insisted that the law was not there to "interfere" but to "regulate". Gonzi added that he saw no reason as to why the House shouldn't be able to reach a consensus over the authority's role.

The bill outlaws embryo freezing and proposed the novel science of freezing the female gametes - ova - which are then fertilised in pairs: after harvesting, two eggs are fertilised with sperm, while the rest of the eggs are frozen for later use. Unlike embryo freezing, vitrification skirts the ethical dilemmas of leaving 'unclaimed' human embryos in freezers. No more than two ova can be fertilised during each fertilisation cycle, and access to IVF will be regulated by an embryology authority to decide who is entitled to the free treatment.

Labour however said the law should not limit the number of eggs that get fertilized, and that this should be decided by best medical practice according to the consultant overseeing the infertile couple's IVF treatment.

But the Prime Minister said that he did not agree with this proposal and insisted that that no more than two should be fertilised.

Concluding, Gonzi proposed a 24-hour timeframe in which the Nationalist and Labour party analyse each other's proposals, with the amendments to be then discussed and approved in the House at committee stage.

Also addressing the House this evening were PN MPs Charlo Bonnici, Beppe Fenech Adami, Francis Zammit Dimech, Stephen Spiteri and Gozo Minister Giovanna Debono.

All MPs underlined the importance of safeguarding the embryo, the parents and the regulation of the service.

avatar
Mela fadallha DNA MALTA? Int mandra ghamiltha sur gonzidcgpn.
avatar
Our government by the principle of subsidiarity has every right to legislate a ban on human embryo freezing in the state of Malta. However we could use this situation to describe a case of citizen active right in the EU. This would for example be the case if a European association is set up which applies for funds from the EU to support the costs for a childless couples living anywhere in the EU who want to freeze their so called human embryos in a EU country which allows such a procedure. Individual Rights of a European citizen transcend those of the rules and laws of what happens in an individual member state.
avatar
An interesting ethical problem which arises is this. If a woman vitrifies ova during marriage do they belong to the couple as part of the community of acquests or do they belong solely to the woman. If so we might be creating a new situation of women vitrifying ova just in case their marriage fails and in doing creating an infidelity of intention.
avatar
Fis-snin sittin kellna l-qassisin politikanti. Fl-aħħar tlett snin tfaċċaw il-politikanti qassisin. Tgħid qed jerġa joqrob żmien l-imperu ruman, fejn iċ-ċesri jikkunsidra ruħu Alla ?
avatar
DNA - that's a big word for you Gonz! If you believe in DNA you believe in evolution and if you believe in evolution you believe that we are descended from an ape like creature and the old testament that you think gives you so much authority - is mostly fairy tales for sheep herders! There is something particularly revolting about a politician showing no principles other than to deceive and lie. The difference between Gonzi and the Taliban is that at least they have the courage to say the truth about their believes!
avatar
So what happens if the woman has a weak womb and can not carry a child, No surrogate, which means the couple can still not have a child. I also like the 5 man committee, I hope there are more women than men on it as women are more in-tune with women's problems than men can ever be. What happens if neither of the two implanted embryos take are you put on the bottom of the list as you have no frozen ones to use. There are a lot of questions that neither parties have answered.
avatar
So you need a license to be born, sorry certificate! So if a child is born with IVF use, they should thank the Minister for his permission, reminds me of permission given by a Lord in Medieval times for his subjects to get married. Is this reasonable?