PBS to take legal steps against Broadcasting Authority

National broadcaster to challenge BA’s decision to turn ‘recommendation’ into directive.

Simon Busuttil (l) and Louis Grech
Simon Busuttil (l) and Louis Grech

The Public Broadcasting Services has announced it will take legal action against the Broadcasting Authority, after the broadcasting regulator directed TVM to host a debate between the Labour and the Nationalist deputy leaders on Dissett tomorrow (Saturday) before a scheduled appearance on Xarabank on 11 January.

The BA was asked to intervene by the Nationalist Party after the producers of Dissett failed to invite Simon Busuttil in a programme where newly-elected Labour deputy leader Louis Grech was to participate.

The PL on its part said it had asked Dissett's producers to invite Busuttil to take part in the interview, but it was PBS that insisted on having Grech participate in Dissett and later host the two deputy leaders on Xarabank.

In a meeting held on Friday between the PBS board of directors and the editorial board, a decision was taken to take the BA directive to the law courts, claiming the BA's "recommendation" to host both deputy leaders on Dissett was later changed into a binding directive.

The tiff between the national TV station and the BA is believed to stem from the PBS's editorial board insistence on having Busuttil and Grech face off against each other on the live-audience Xarabank programme of 11 January, rather than on Dissett, which is presented by veteran journalist Reno Bugeja.

The original BA recommendation to PBS to have the two deputy leaders on Dissett was initially dismissed by the national broadcaster, which said it would retain its editorial authority not to host Busuttil and Grech on the 5 January programme of Dissett.

On its part, Labour has insisted that when it had received the invitation to Dissett it had asked to have Simon Busuttil in the studio. "PBS informed us of the decision to have Louis Grech feature on Dissett on his own. To avoid any controversy, Labour has agreed to have the deputy leaders meet on Dissett on another date... this a decision that respects the Christmas truce between both parties."

The BA later issued a statement making it clear that it was "ordering" PBS to adhere to its original recommendation.

"The [BA] board feels that the recommendation should have been upheld and accepted by the state broadcaster. The board notes with disappointment that PBS chose to place itself above the Authority's decision. This is not acceptable and will not be tolerated, especially in such sensitive times when the election campaign is just a few days away."

avatar
The PBS should take legal action against common sense.
avatar
Bloody unbelievable!!!!The supplier wants to take the regulator to court for telling the supplier that it was in the wrong. Both are financed by our hard earned taxes. The supplier is arrogant, hijacked and controlled by a few agenda-driven puppets while the regulator is without balls...if it had balls it would ORDER not RECOMMEND. Farce? What farce? Malta has become symbolic of farce!!!! And Xarabank SHOULD NOT be involved in political debates. If it wants to be involved it should do it on its own merit. As things appear there is obviously an illegal collusion between PBS (state-owned) and Xarabank (private-owned) and this is unfair trading!!! certainly not a case of PPP!
avatar
Joseph Sant
@Thorny - you couldn't be more wrong on this one mate.
avatar
Joseph Sant
@Thorny - you couldn't be more wrong on this one mate.
avatar
I believe that PBS is making all this fuss because it wants to give Simon Busttil the home advantage and a sympathetic (if not rigged) referee. Louis Grech is sanguine enough that for him it is of no consequence whether the venue is Disset or Xarabank. On the other hand Simon Busuttil is going to punch well above his weight. Believe you me he is going to need all the help he can get. Woefully though this whole pathetic episode underlines certain home truths. For the PN any authority is there to serve the party’s interests. The word authority has been relegated to mere window dressing. It is now obvious that the dei ex machina of National broadcasting is W.E. of Peppi Azzopardi and Lou Bondi.
avatar
The Broadcasting Authority should be dismantled and 'Where is Everybody' should take its place. It would be the ultimate contempt!
avatar
The arrogance and superciliousness of PBS is truly remarkable. We already have a Broadcasting authority who has been rather supine and inactive in controlling the worrying trends within PBS of political lackeys and program monopoly by a grossly biased Where's everybody. Certainly PBS had a lot to celebrate recently for the past 50 years in going round full circle of showing how an undemocratic public media does looks like. PBS has become an intolerable stain on a fair independent media working in the interest of all the citizens.
avatar
maria aquilina
Stupid, it is not PBS taking legal steps against Broadcasting Authority....It is GONZIPN WHO IS TAKING LEGAL STEPS AGAINST THE AUTHORITY.
avatar
maria aquilina
Stupid, it is not PBS taking legal steps against Broadcasting Authority....It is GONZIPN WHO IS TAKING LEGAL STEPS AGAINST THE AUTHORITY.
avatar
I do not understand what isbothering PBS to let Disett carry on the debate between the two deputy leaders. Is it possible that PBS feel that with Peppi they can give more protection to the PN? The BA did the right thing and shoukd go further and not let biased presenerslead political debates. Only the BA should air political debates in an electoral period. Franco was very right in saying that PBS is a PN club
avatar
I HAVE NO FAITH IN THE IMPARTIALITY OF PBS NOR IN ITS LEGAL OBLIGATIONS TO THE BROADCASTING AUTHORITY. PBS HAS BEEN REDUCED TO A PAWN BY GONZIPN JUST AS XANDIR MALTA HAD BEEN REDUCED TO A PAWL 25 YEARS EARLIER. TWO WRONGS HAVE NEVER MADE ONE RIGHT AND PBS, FUNDED BY US, THE PEOPLE OF MALTA, SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE ABSOLUTE DEGENERATION OF ITS LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES TOWARDS IMPARTIALITY.
avatar
Luke Camilleri
The B.A. and the PBS are just putting on a PUNCH & JUDY SHOW, putting on a show of punching each other WHEN IT IS THE PUPPETEER who is running the show behind the scenes! Gonzi & Co just fit the bill and make excellent PUPPETEERS and are PROFESSORS in the art!
avatar
Tajba u tahraq. Ghax ma inzarmawx l-awtoritajiet kollha li jezistu? Il-PBS il fuq mir regolatur?