Prime Minister commissions review of Code of Ethics

Prime Minister Joseph Muscat has commissioned a review of the Code of Ethics to ‘reflect today’s realities’.

Prime Minister Joseph Muscat at the Justus Lipsius building in Brussels. (Photo: Reuben Piscopo/DOI)
Prime Minister Joseph Muscat at the Justus Lipsius building in Brussels. (Photo: Reuben Piscopo/DOI)

During his first Cabinet meeting yesterday evening, Prime Minister Joseph Muscat commissioned a review of the Code of Ethics to reflect the "realities of today".

"The Code of Ethics was written 18 years ago and it's time to update it to reflect today's realities," he said, during an informal press conference with the media in Brussels.

Muscat was replying to questions on whether ministers would be allowed to keep receiving retainers from their private business or legal firms. He insisted that the Cabinet would however follow the ministerial code of ethics.

The Prime Minister also rubbished suggestions that the Labour government was going "to politicise" the public service.

Nationalist MP Mario de Marco today dubbed the designate-head of the civil service, Mario Cutajar "a hardcore party man" whose invitation to permanent secretaries and other government appointees to hand in their resignations, had gone "against all standard procedures and ignoring Constitutional provisions."

De Marco, a former tourism and culture minister now believed to be vying for the party leadership, said the appointment of former General Workers Union deputy secretary-general Mario Cutajar "can only be interpreted as a means to politicise the public service, a throwback to an undesirable past."

But Muscat defended this decision as "a normal procedure that followed after every change in government".

"This doesn't mean that every resignation letter will be accepted, but the Prime Minister can ask for it. Just like we confirmed that Malta's ambassador to the EU will retain her post because we believe she is the best person to hold this position, so will be the case with other positions," he said.

The Prime Minister in fact today held a private meeting with Malta's permanent representative Marlene Bonnici in which she was asked whether she wished to continue with her role. Bonnici accepted Muscat's request and the same offer was then extended to all workers at Malta's permanent representation.

De Marco today also criticised the fusing of justice and home affairs as part of the same ministry, "something Labour had criticised and voted against in Parliament just a few months ago" - referring to the motion of no confidence in Carm Mifsud Bonnici which garnered the support of Nationalist MP Franco Debono.

"It is now amply clear that their position then was motivated solely by political opportunism, and nothing else. Is this what was meant by a change in direction, one might ask?"

However, Muscat justified this decision by insisting that the Labour Party had pledged the appointment of two persons who would be politically responsible of the two sectors.

"We were always clear in what we were proposing: that two persons would be individually responsible of the two sectors. And this is the case," he said.

Muscat also said that his decision to place the disciplinary forces under one ministry was taken with the believe that there should be synergy between all forces - civil protection, armed forces and the police force.

Fielding light questions about his first participation at the EU summit as Malta's newly elected Prime Minister, Muscat said that he was "building bridges and new friendships" with member states leaders.

He also said that he spoke with Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean Claude Juncker and expressed his wish for the relationship that had started with former PM Lawrence Gonzi to continue with him [Muscat] as well.

avatar
Apparently Dr Demarco does not know that the Civil Service Management code calls on Permanent Secretaries to hand in their resignation on the EVE of the election, which by my calculation was Friday 8th March 2013. Thus these Permanent Secretaries are either ignorant of this code (as they are responsible in employing it in the departments under their control) or utterly disrespectful of it. So it would be good for the future of Malta if Dr Demarco does not talk nonsense in order to try and give a boost to his leadership campaign. Furthermore, the politicisation of the civil service was the work of Dr Austin Gatt (him again). And if you want real proof look at the Report of the Public Service Reform Commission (1989) which criticised the Labour Government for following seniority as the principal mode of promotion in the civil service. Seniority has no political colour. Yes Labour did promote some of its people but unlike the PN they did not make it policy. If they had why critise them on seniority?
avatar
Dan Mario de Marco irid idahhaq minghalih. Mela nesa x'gara matul is-snin ta' gvernijiet Nazzjonalista? Jew ISSA irid jilaghba tad-dejjaq? Dejjeq iva, izda l-500 Ewro zieda hadha Dr de Marco. Ara fuq dik ma sab xejn hazin. Hallina Mario!
avatar
Hate to spoil the party boys, but will somebody tell the dazed short figure in the middle that political protocol calls for the communications director to stand aside when the PM is holding a conversation. Now that the PL has been successful by adopting Obama's political campaign, has anyone ever seen Obama's communications director other than as a White House spokeman giving a press conference. Let's get it right and in future remove these distractions from what the PM is trying to get across. Protocol calls to be invisible when you have nothing to say and sticking so close might leave a bad impression for a happily married PM.
avatar
Every incoming Government in the Democratic World reserves the right to place people of trust to positions where they can forge forward the will of the people. For Mario De Marco to criticize the Government for doing so is simply political opportunism, arrogance and a lack of belief in the democratic process - typically of the dictatorial way GONZIPN manipulated the Civil Servants in the last 10 years. How can the incoming Government accept appointments made in the last weeks of the Campaign, in one instance in the last 2 days alone. It would be political suicide to keep these people there to kill the people's wishes.
avatar
The Code of Ethics should apply for all including top ranking Government officials. I will let people judge as to who is "politicising" the public service ... or not ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSY1NTE7F10
avatar
How can DeMarco accuse the PM that he is politicising the public service when it is lock stock and barrel completely dominated with PN activists? His GonziPN has blocked all the top government 200+ positions, including directors, directors general and permanent secretaries with three year contracts that will come to an end close to the next election campaign. Why didn't DeMarco mention the 90 officials that were transferred en block from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1987 when Eddie was elected on the battle cry of reconciliation, to make way for people like Ms Marlene Bonnici? When are those left out going to be given a break? The electorate has elected a new government by a huge margin and this is the guideline that the PM has to take, considering that Alfred Sant and his ministers were derided in 1996 when they failed to make any changes.