Curia confirms alleged priest abuse case was investigated

Curia confirms that allegations that priest abused vulnerable person were investigated

Weekly newspaper Illum reports that the Curia confirmed that the case revolving around allegations that a priest sexually abused a psychologically and mentally vulnerable person were investigated by the Church Response Team.

The Curia also said that the priest in question did not agree with the decision reached by the Response Team, and requested for this decision to be revised.

The confirmations emerged from a number of clarifications made by the Curia to Illum following revelations that a prominent priest in the Maltese Church is facing a number of police reports.

The most serous of these reports deals with accusations by a person who alleges that she was abused by the priest for sexual purposes despite being vulnerable both emotionally and psychologically.

She alleges that the abuse took place over a number of months, and that it involved sexual acts which he either persuaded her to perform on him, or her performed on her.

The person is also alleging that Archbishop Paul Cremona not only knew of the case, but also had personally intervened to persuade her to forgive the priest when she had first tried to take steps against him within Church structures, as well as the Police.

When first contacted and confronted with the allegations weeks ago, the Archbishop's categorically declined to comment about the two police reports, or about the case itself.

However in a statement published in the Illum on Sunday, the Curia said Archbishop Paul Cremona is "bound by secrecy" because the first contact he had with the person who is alleging abuse "took place years before he became Archbishop of Malta."

"This pastoral contact between Fr Pawl Cremona O.P. and this person, sometimes included the Sacrament of Confession. This is why Mons the Archbishop is bound by secrecy," the Curia said.

The Curia went on to say that the case was referred to the Church Response Team "years ago," and that that the case was then investigated.

The Curia did not however divulge details regarding when this report was made, when the investigation took place, what were the investigation's findings, and what steps were taken based on these findings.

What the Curia did say however was that the priest involved did not agree with the findings, and requested a revision.

The Curia also confirmed that in August 2011, the person making the allegations had first brought the case before the Police, and had also made contact with Cremona regarding the case.

However the Curia said that this took place "years before" Cremona became Archbishop, and said that because of this " the Archbishop is bound by secrecy."

"All this too place before Mons Charles Scicluna came to Malta as Auxiliary Bishop," the Curia also specified.

Illum also reports that investigations into the case by Police are underway, as during the past week a number of people involved in the case were interviewed by the police.

Among them, the Illum reports, are the person making he allegations of sexual abuse, and the priest himself.

avatar
Why is the C Church being allowed to hide all these abuses without the police actively investigating these cases. As Bill Maher said, the Turin Shroud is the only dirty linen that the new, humble Pope will be airing.
avatar
Sorry this article is badly written, with parts contradicting each other - and leaves much to be desired! ... Did she make contact with Cremona first in 2011 (as stated somewhere in the article) or earlier when he was not yet bishop??? Did he tell her to forgive the errant priest as her confessor or the bishop??? ... What does Scicluna have to do with it, and if nothing, why was he mentioned??? Please get your facts right and then give them to us! ... And the church really needs to come clean, always playing their silly games of hide and seek! Send them all to prison and we see after 5 years how silent they will remain.
avatar
Even counsellors and psychotherapists who are bound to client confidentiality are expected to breach their silence if an abuse of care is alleged, particularly when this involves minors or vulnerable adults. Thrre are ways and means of taking action to help a vulnerable person after a disclosure, all of which require the involvement of protection agencies. The days of the curia running an internal inquisition on its victims are long gone, or are they?
avatar
dear curia please be advised that the pope today has confirmed that every bishop in every country that represents the church has to despose of any priest that sexually abuses a person or persons.
avatar
No other organisation is allowed to investigate allegations of abuse simply as an internal matter. Such accusations if made of a teacher or a doctor always need to be reported to the police by the organisation in the first instance. Why is the Church permitted to ignore the laws of the land and its duty of care?
avatar
The law should be amended to make it: 1. Obligatory for the clergy to refer any abuse allegations to the police this sort of abuse irrespective of internal investigations 2. Anyone clergy member who refrains from reporting this abuse to the police, or lobby with the victim, should be treated as an accessory to justice. It is convenient to hide (or delay) reporting abuse behind a response team and secrecy of confession.
avatar
CUT THE BULL! Shouldn't THE POLICE do the investigating or is the Church a republic within a republic???? The investigation report should be given to the Police and let the law take its course... even if belated!
avatar
Over 21,700 have viewed this shocking list of 174 accused clerics --- http://mnsnap.wordpress.com/villainous-mn-clerics/