Carm Mifsud Bonnici rubbishes EU Justice scoreboard report
Former Justice and Home Affairs Minister Carm Mifsud Bonnici rubbishes EU justice scoreboard that gave negative outlook to Maltese courts
Former Justice and Home Affairs Minister Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici has rubbished a recent EU justice scoreboard report that found that despite Malta's high rate of judges, magistrates, and especially lawyers the court system "is not performing adequately and needs improvement."
"The report was certainly not one of the level that one would expect from the EU Commission," Mifsud Bonnici in a parliamentary address on Monday that was characterized by a rundown of work done in the police force, the prison, and the courts under his time as minster in the preceding administration.
"Certainly, if I was minister at the time when this report was published I would have said a word or two to the Commission regarding how it arrived to figures," Mifsud Bonnici said, speaking of the EU justice scoreboard report.
He noted how the report itself noted that it found several difficulties in the process of obtaining data, and that comparisons of the data "was very problematic."
"With all due respect, I think that the report does not do the commission justice as it does not truly respect the figures," Mifsud Bonnici.
By way of example, the former minister pointed to the report's observation that the time necessary for the Administrative Tribunal to resolve a case (in 2010) stood at 2,500 days per case.
"I cannot fathom how the Commission reached this conclusion when the Administrative Tribunal takes 2,500 days to close a case when the Tribunal came into effect in 2009. That means that the longest a case could have been before the Tribunal was only 365 days."
"This report does not do the Commission justice," Mifsud Bonnici reiterated. "One needs to ensure that this message is passed onto Commissioner Viviane Reding."
According to the report, which found a lack of data to compare the justice budgets with the clearance rates of court cases, it looks like the timely and efficient disposition of cases "is more a matter of distribution and efficiency of use and procedural complexity, and less a matter of amount of resources that are allocated."