PN dissects its first 100 days as a party in Opposition

PN leadership geared up for MEP elections; dissects its first 100 days as a party in Opposition while insisting that the Labour government has not learnt from previous administration’s mistakes.

Opposition Leader Simon Busuttil
Opposition Leader Simon Busuttil

The first political target of the Nationalist Party is the MEP elections taking place next year, with the goal of electing its first three MEPs in 10 years.

As a party in Opposition, the PN wants to be a scrutinising force that also puts forwards alternative policies.

Somewhat reminiscent of a Labour Party during the electoral campaign, the PN wants to push forward 'good governance', portraying a party that was "in favour of transparency, high standards and ethics".

But how can the PN be credible when it had been embroidered in political appointments which were too close for comfort?

"Are we credible when we point out the Labour government's lack of ethics in repeated instances? I would say that the PN administration had been heavily criticised by the then Labour opposition and yet it seems the government has not learned from past mistakes," PN leader Simon Busuttil said.

"After everything the PL used to say, we would have expected it to act differently... but it is clear from the start that Labour has thrown out ethics and standards out of the window."

Addressing a press conference on the PN's first 100 days in Opposition, Busuttil said the party had embarked on a renewal process that would lead to a strong and constructive opposition.

Pressing on the Franco Mercieca waiver, Busuttil said the opposition will keep on pressing in parliament to know how much had the parliamentary secretary earned while conducting his private operations during his first 100 days as a junior minister.

"It is in the public's interest to know," the PN leader insisted.

Government's lack of standards, he added, was shown in it signing a memorandum of understanding with a Chinese company which was blacklisted by the World Bank.

Insisting that the PN had "nothing against" Chinese investment, the agreement "contrasted" with a government who heavily campaigned on transparency.

Asked whether the PN was in favour of a tunnel or a bridge linking Malta and Gozo, Busuttil said it would be premature to take a position before all necessary studies were conducted.

For transparency's sake, Busuttil was asked whether the Nationalist Party would be publishing its financial accounts and costs incurred during the electoral campaign.

"We will see that our accounts are published according to the law," Busuttil said.

A party financing law has yet to be enacted by parliament. Busuttil said that while it was a challenge for the commission appointed to review the party's financial situation - facing an €8 million debt - in respect of "good governance" the PN wanted to see that transparency is applicable to both government and opposition.

He did not mince his words when he dubbed the amnesty granted to prisoners "a payback for the electoral victory". Standing by the PN's media reports that ministers Marie Louise Coleiro Preca and Anton Refalo were among the Cabinet members who had promised the amnesty during the election campaign, Busuttil said he was still waiting for the government's reaction.

He was also very curt in describing former Nationalist MPs Jesmond Mugliett, Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando and Franco Debono as Labour supporters. Asked what was the PN's final position with regard to the three, Busuttil said: "The last time I check they were militating within the PL".

He however was less accusing of the appointment of Lou Bondì on the national festivities board: "I took note of his appointment, along with that of the other members of the board."

The PN was still "unhappy" about Debono's appointment as coordinator of the Constitutional Convention.

"We are not happy about the way the constitutional reform has been tackled so far. We however recognise it is a sensitive issues which should keep us united as a nation. We are still giving the government the opportunity to tackle it correctly. Franco Debono's appointment was not a step in the right direction," Busuttil said.

It was also confirmed that secretary-general Chris Said had "personally" called former Commissioner John Dalli in the past days. According to Police Commissioner Peter Paul Zammit, there is no case against Dalli over alleged bribery involving Swedish Match.

"But let's keep things in perspective," Busuttil added. "We are a party in opposition. Evidently, Dalli was already in talks with the government. If he is practically to lead Mater Dei Hospital, no less a vote of no confidence in the Health Minister, we will have to stick to our role as Opposition and scrutinize Dalli's work." 

avatar
@ Axel @ dscerri You clearly don’t follow what happens in this country very well. In an article in this very same paper, with the headline “Prime Minister mulled over Franco Mercieca’s waiver”, the following was reported by MaltaToday: “In an undercover video filmed by the Sunday Times at the St James Hospital, it was revealed that Mercieca on Wednesday carried our three cataract operations and six cosmetic laser eye-correction operations between 7am and 1pm, for a total of €3,600 for his half day's work.” So as you can see, the 3600 euros was paid directly to Mercieca for half a day’s work. Now do you agree with me? Or perhaps you don't because Mercieca is a Labourite?
avatar
@ Axel @ dscerri You clearly don’t follow what happens in this country very well. In an article in this very same paper, with the headline “Prime Minister mulled over Franco Mercieca’s waiver”, the following was reported by MaltaToday: “In an undercover video filmed by the Sunday Times at the St James Hospital, it was revealed that Mercieca on Wednesday carried our three cataract operations and six cosmetic laser eye-correction operations between 7am and 1pm, for a total of €3,600 for his half day's work.” So as you can see, the 3600 euros was paid directly to Mercieca for half a day’s work. Now do you agree with me? Or perhaps you don't because Mercieca is a Labourite?
avatar
@ Axel @ dscerri You clearly don’t follow what happens in this country very well. In an article in this very same paper, with the headline “Prime Minister mulled over Franco Mercieca’s waiver”, the following was reported by MaltaToday: “In an undercover video filmed by the Sunday Times at the St James Hospital, it was revealed that Mercieca on Wednesday carried our three cataract operations and six cosmetic laser eye-correction operations between 7am and 1pm, for a total of €3,600 for his half day's work.” So as you can see, the 3600 euros was paid directly to Mercieca for half a day’s work. Now do you agree with me? Or perhaps you don't because Mercieca is a Labourite?
avatar
@ dscerri I'm afraid it is you who are wrong. Franco Mercieca was PAID a TOTAL of 3600 euros for 8 or 9 short operations done in a single morning. FACT!!
avatar
Busullotti kont, ghadek u tibqa. Kontinwazzjoni tac-cucati li kont tghid waqt il-kampanja elettorali. Ma tghallimt propju xejn.
avatar
Simon b'din ir-rata mhux se twassal sa l-elezzjoni generali li jmiss fil-kariga ta' kompromess li poggewk fiha. Taf min hemm lest biex johodlok postok mill-aktar fis possibli u fil hin opportun? Kompli wittilu t-triq halli tkun ghamiltlu id-dirty work kollu u jidher sabih warajk. Bhal Gonzi se jigrilek u dalwaqt.
avatar
I don't consider going on and on about the Franco Mercieca case, constructive criticism. Please talk about the issues.
avatar
@tweetybirdie - ktibt pataflun bla valur ta' xejn, ghax ibbazajt kollox fuq il-fatt li jiehu 3600 euros f'nofs ta' nhar ghal operazzjoni wahda. Possibbli ma tafx li minn dawk iridu jithallsu wkoll l-isptar talli juzaw it-theatre u l-kamra tal-pazjent, in-nurses, l-anestetista u min jaf ghal kemm-il haga ohra.
avatar
When is this man going to come out of the closet?
avatar
First 100 days summed up with simple grading: PL, B-. Good start, but more needs to be done, such as whistle blowers act. PN, F. Awful. A complete disgrace. Learned nothing from your annihilation at the polling booth. Still acting sanctimonious to one and all, nothing but bitching, moaning and finger pointing. Terrible.
avatar
@tweetybirdie - you completely fail to understand that €3,600 is not cash-in-hand, but what the private patient pays for a procedure. The entire team of medical staff need to be paid from that, as does the medical facility, and then there are equipment costs too.
avatar
The Franco Mercieca case has brought to light more than just the fact that he had gone beyond the PM's waiver. Indeed, given the OBSCENE amounts of money these doctors have come to expect (in the case of Mercieca, 3600 euros for a single morning’s work!), it is no wonder that the Health system is so cripplingly costly -- and there is therefore so much backlog. I know that consultants do not earn anything like this amount in the government health service, but – besides the fact that they are already pretty well paid in their government position – the fact that they are allowed private practice puts them in a terrible position of conflict of interest. It is clearly advantageous to them for there to be queues at government hospitals so that patients can gently be told that if they want to jump the queue, they can come to the doctor’s private clinic, where s/he may decide to ‘reassess’ the urgency with which they should be seen at hospital, or perhaps get them to switch to treatment with them at a private hospital. Besides this, when a person earns 3600 euros in a morning in a private hospital, and not a huge amount more than that in a MONTH in his/her government job, it is likely that that person’s priorities will revolve around his/her private work – and both the amount of time dedicated to government work, and one’s motivation, will suffer greatly. In my view, this is something which needs to be addressed, since the ‘inefficiencies’ in government hospitals may well be being ‘engineered’ to be the way they are – and the ability to practice privately, and the obvious conflict of interest this creates, could very well be at the root of this. Anyway, why this special dispensation? Don’t all other government full-time workers have to work *full time* for government? Nobody else is, to my knowledge, allowed private practice alongside his/her government work!
avatar
get your head out of the sand Simon!