Parliament | Muscat accuses Opposition of not defending national interest

Government’s plans to send back migrants to Libya thwarted as European Court of Human Rights officially blocks migrant pushback in writing.

Prime Minister Joseph Muscat yesterday told the House that his government was considering sending back single Somali men who arrived yesterday morning by sea back to Libya, except for children and their parents, pregnant women and physically vulnerable persons.

His controversial decision was yesterday blocked by an interim stop order by the European Court of Human Rights, which wants the government to answer by 30 July why the asylum claims of some 45 migrants were not evaluated before being deported to Libya,

"We stood up to be counted. I am ready to carry the responsibility personally and whoever makes different decisions should also carry full responsibility," Muscat said as he addressed the House before being alerted that the ECHR order had been formally received.

Insisting that his government would respect the rule of law, Muscat said that he gave instructions to ensure that all options are explored and all preparations for whatever decision is taken were underway.

In an attempt to justify the government's decision to "explore all options, including sending back migrants to Libya," Muscat said that during the last 40 hours, over 1,000 persons attempted to gain access to Europe by sea from North Africa.

Insisting that the situation in the Mediterranean was not being addressed with the necessary urgency by the international community, Muscat said the government was not bluffing. "We are weighing all options available, which are all legitimate to protect the national interest."

Muscat also revealed that the Libyan government had accepted the pushback, which was to take place using two Air Malta flights carrying two police officers for each migrant, transporting them to Mitiga airport.

The prime minister yesterday also claimed his action had achieved success after European Commissioner Cecilia Malmström said that the EU would be looking into giving Malta assistance to take up the asylum burden.

"I would like to stress that according to EU and international obligations, all people arriving in the EU territory are entitled to file an asylum request and to have a proper assessment of their situation. Any return operation has to respect in full these obligations and in particular the principle of non-refoulement inscribed in the EU law and in the International Conventions," Malmström said.

Home Affairs minister Manuel Mallia was seated next to a nervous Muscat all throughout yesterday's sitting. "If the government does not make it clear that we mean business we will remain pushovers... there is nothing particular about asking the EU Member States to show solidarity."

'Not in my name'

Opposition leader Simon Busuttil gave a strong speech in the House yesterday as he described the government's decision to seriously consider the pushback "incredible, shocking and unacceptable."

He condemned the government's decision as a politically, ethical and legally objectionable decision, and asked under which conditions were the asylum seekers being deported, and what agreement had been reached with the Libyan authorities.

He gave much weight to the Hirsi judgement by the European Court of Human Rights, and asked Muscat how he could take such a decision and sleep at night, in the knowledge of the illegality of the pushback.

Busuttil warned that if Muscat wanted to go ahead with such illegal actions, it would "not be in our name," adding that the Prime Minister would have to carry the responsibilities of such an "inhumane" action. "Such a decision does not only work against the country's interest but it would tarnish the country's reputation in Europe."

Busuttil also asked what would the Prime Minister's reply to the NGOs calling on the government to rethink its decision to send the migrants back to Libya.

"We will not be accomplices with the government which is intent on breaking international law, disregards human rights and tarnishes  Malta's reputation," Busuttil said.

"I ask what kind of negations the government had with the EU before pressing the panic button? I ask how many times did the minister discuss the issue at EU level in the last four months?" Busuttil said, insisting that the Opposition was ready to stand by the government in its negotiations with the EU and neighbouring countries as long as the international law was respected.

"What guarantee do you have that this government will treat you humanely, protect your rights and your dignity when it does not do the same with other human beings?"

Muscat lashes out at Opposition

In a debate which also saw former prime minister Lawrence Gonzi weighing in, where he accused Muscat of having floundered at the first decision that demanded a humanitarian response, Muscat replied to Opposition MPs by saying that he was defending the "national interest" and standing his ground.

He attacked the Opposition and leader Simon Busuttil over their "inconsistency" on asylum and migration, citing the 2002 forcible repatriation of Eritreans back to their home country, which then became the subject of an Amnesty International report on the torture they were submitted to upon returning home.

Muscat also accused Busuttil of having penned articles where he argued in favour of pushbacks.

Defending his stand, Muscat said: "It's a clear signal that I am consistent in my values and ideas which I hold with pride."

"What are we being accused of this evening? Why have we faced a political firing squad tonight? The only thing we can be accused of is that of not giving in and accepting everything."

Muscat told the House Malta's reputation had not been tarnished because the EU knew that the island was no pushover. "Malta means business," Muscat said, rebutting Busuttil's comment that Muscat had been 'condemned' by a statement by the European Commission. "This is no a fatwah... we live in a world where we make arguments."

He added that the government was only exploring all possible options and pointed out that home affairs minister Manuel Mallia abstained in a European council meeting last week over a vote on migration because the policy did not go far enough.

Arguing that EU leaders were against compulsory burden sharing, "which European leaders believe would attract more migrants to Malta and Europe," Muscat said the EU should look at cooperating with Libya and other North African countries to address the problems in the region.

The Prime Minister concluded his address by claiming that while Malta would respect the law, it would not be bullied into accepting everything.

avatar
Will all those experts who want to teach us all about what is humane and what is a right, make the same emphasis as to what is just and what are one's duties? Asylum laws in the EU have been shoved down everybody's throats by the bullies who are not affected by illegal migration. Laws can be unjust, as these ones. Where there is no justice, there are no human rights, no real freedom and hypocrisy and evil reign. The EU should URGENTLY change its asylum laws. Giving an EU ID with freedom of movement to ALL asylum seekers should solve many a problem, giving equal rights and duties to all member countries, in a balancing dose. Why don't the NGOs, PN, 69-lawyers, and all other so called 'defenders' of human rights and illegal immigration suggest such a solution to the big bullies of the EU?
avatar
How many can we help... this is the problem for all EU & the rest of the world. Population 2013 SOMALIA 10 Million (population growth 75,000 a year), UGANDA 37 Million (growth 643,970 a year), KENYA 43.5 Million (growth 1 million a year), NIGERIA 174 Million (growth 5,220,000 a year) Population of MALTA 452,515 (SPAIN 47.2 million ITALY 59.7 million) Please we all need to do something about this!?!
avatar
Forget the losers Joseph, and carry on, the people are with you and you know it.
avatar
eleonoray86cws Ca?uana
So the PM suggests breaking the law and calls it National Interest and then accuses the opposition for not being an accomplice in his illegal acts. Utterly disgusting.
avatar
eleonoray86cws Ca?uana
So the PM suggests breaking the law and calls it National Interest and then accuses the opposition for not being an accomplice in his illegal acts. Utterly disgusting.
avatar
To the PM you have done the right thing stand up and be counted do not bow to the EU they think of us as a yes sir my arse is yes sir we are a drop in an ocean but we have big time balls we are Maltese, and for Simon Busutill and his party you are traitors of your country you know Joseph is right in what he is doing but you are a pussy.
avatar
I respect their different culture, race, origin and (often) different religion but feel that Malta's tiny size and limitations make it unable to receive the influx given the numbers involved. I support the Government's stance at EU level regarding burden sharing. Yesterday our prime minister was stopped from implementing a pushback policy by European Court on grounds that pushback breaches their human rights. I agree that they are treated with respect and Dr. Muscat has already said that the Maltese Government will respect the decision. However since they have human rights (& I fully agree), then they should also have the Right of Free Movement. Technically, Malta is part of the EU. When they entered Maltese territory they entered the EU. So how about the Maltese Government, besides respecting the EU Court decision also invoking the right of free movement? How about issuing those who exceeded the 18-month detention period a document (e.g. ID card) giving them the right to move across the EU? If we cannot breach their human rights through pushback then other EU states should not be able to breach their human right for Freedom of Movement across the EU.
avatar
How about issuing all of them a Maltese passport so that they can travel to Europe whenever they like.Better still giving them also a free trip to Brussels.
avatar
Simon Busuttil has conveniently forgotten that it was the Nationalist government which set a precedent by sending back Eritreans refugees. How short is his memory?
avatar
This is a clear message,next year remember don't vote for PN.MEP.They don't care for our children future.
avatar
'NOT IN MY NAME''GOVERNMENT IS MORALLY, POLITICALLY AND LEGALLY WRONG - T.O.M.' This is Simon Busuttil today on ther pushbacks. Two years ago he voted in favour of pushbacks. What made him change his view as the Prime Minister told him was that pushbacks are now illegal. So Simon Busuttil is of the same opinion re the MORAL AND POLITICAL EFFECTS as he was 2 years ago. And whio says tat HYPOCRACY does not exist?
avatar
INCREDIBLE, SHOCKING AND UNACCETABLE to have an Opposition that does not defend the national interest. In Parliament tonight it was as clear as crystal that the only interest the Opposition had, was to try to discredit the Prime Minister and Minister Mallia. Shame on the PN.
avatar
Why all this fuss it's easy don't go and pick them up especially when they are miles away.If they know that they are not going to be pitched they won't try.
avatar
Joseph have the people's mandate to do whatever is needed.Joseph should ask all those in Malta who are against pushback to be humane and take a couple of them in their home.Joseph Cilia
avatar
I fully agree with A. Mizzi, we should push these unfortunate people NORTH yes to the EU rich countries.
avatar
Maelstrom and Busuttil are rich and will afford living in peaceful places away from the social and racial strife that will engulf Malta in future. Their children are well-provided for and will live in comfort away fom the turmoil. But not our children, the children of those without means and without influence. They will have to live in a society stricken by social catastrophe. Look at the Uk, look at their homegrown terrorists. Remember the butchered soldier? The judges of the ECHR, the salaried employees of the NGO's, journalist Camilleri, the know-all bloggers...none of them will give tuppence for our children's future. They only want to gain political brownie points.
avatar
Fabian Psaila
A message has to be sent that we are not an OPEN HOUSE, we have to make some form of resistance and say to the E.U. ~ ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and to bide Pope Francis's message on immigrants! This message was not addressed to the Maltese or as Dr Simon Busuttil IS LEADING ALL TO BELEIVE but to all nations including the E.U. which is closer to Simon's Heart than Malta! WE SHOULD PUSH-UP not PUSH DOWN these immigrant, PUSH-UP all the way to BRUSSELS!