Leisure industry divided over drinking age revision – GRTU

Bar owners divided over proposal to increase drinking age from 17 to 18, the chamber for small and medium enterprises says.

Commissioner for Children Helen D'Amato's proposal to raise the drinking age from 17 to 18 has been met with a mixed reaction by owners of bars and places of entertainment, GRTU vice-president Philip Fenech.

Given the divergent views within its ranks, the GRTU has not yet taken an official stand, he said.

D'Amato's proposal was one of several proposed amendments to laws concerning issues falling under her remit in a memorandum sent to the Justice Reform Commission.

Speaking to MaltaToday, the commissioner said that the legal age should once again be increased for the same reasons it had been changed in 2009.  

"We believe that the consequences that drinking brings are long term and that was one of the reasons it was raised from 16 u 17," she said.  

Asked what difference would one year make, D'Amato said, "It makes a big difference, especially at such a delicate stage in young persons' lives."

Quoting the European Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (Espad) for Malta, carried out in 2011, D'Amato pointed out that studies showed that links exist between alcohol abuse among young people and short and long-term health risks, the use of other drugs and poor school performance.

Noting that the study showed a worrying picture of alcohol consumption among 16-year-olds in Malta, D'Amato said that 56% of 16-year-olds in Malta admitted to drinking five or more drinks on one occasion within the previous month.

Adding that the studies show that alcohol consumption by adolescents was high compared to other countries, the commissioner said: "We need more education and awareness campaigns apart from enforcement. It would be useless raising the legal age unless it is sustained by stronger enforcement."

D'Amato's calls were also supported by the national anti-dependency agency, however representatives of the leisure industry are divided, according to Philip Fenech, who heads the GRTU's hospitality and leisure division.

"Personally, I believe that it should go up to 18, as this will bring uniformity between Malta and other countries within the EU, where the drinking age is mainly 18," Fenech said.

Fenech added that raising the drinking age would also raise standards in the industry.

"Responsible drinking and responsibility comes with age. I feel that to drink alcohol you have to be mature however, when you look at the industry our members have different views," he added.

Fenech stressed that this was only his personal opinion, and not that of the GRTU, where reactions to the proposal vary, mainly according to the establishments' clientele.

He explained that owners of establishments that catered for a younger clientele argued that raising the minimum drinking age would see them lose a big chunk of their business, threatening their sustainability.

"On the other hand, those whose establishments attracted an older crowd believe that the measure would improve their business, pointing out that the presence of younger people deterred older people from certain areas," Fenech said.

Moreover other establishments, which attracted a mix of younger and older people, expressed similar concerns to those whose venues were geared towards younger crowds.

The GRTU is discussing the proposal, but given the divergent views, it was too early for it to come up with a common stance, he added.

avatar
Luke Camilleri
It-tfal taghna l'ewwel QABEL KULL QLIEGH! Hemm sahhithom fin-nofs u s-serhan tar-ras tal genituri jew ta' min jiehu hsiebhom!
avatar
Helen D'Amato's proposal to raise the drinking age from 17 to 18 is the right thing to do. Some of the bar owners and entertainment establishments might not agree with that decision because they lose profits and that might be a problem for them? This is for the same reason that voting should stay at age 18 and not lower, but in this case a Minister needs more votes and if they lower the voting age to 17 he and his party are apt to gain more votes in a general election. Again I ask the Minister: Would you trust your entire household affairs to your 16 year old teenager? Of course not! So why do you want to trust the whole country's future to a 16 year old teen? No way Jose.
avatar
One outcome of all this will soon be ...that Helen D'Amato will be asked to resign!!! Just you all wait and see!
avatar
This shows that some in the leisuire industry do not care a hoot about our youth as long as they fatten their pockets.
avatar
Government should only be concerned about the well-being of the younger generation growing up and not about how the introit or vice versa of an establishment are going to be affected. As a suggestion Government could send out a questionnaire to all families and get the feed back. That should settle what the real responsible people having young children under their care really want.
avatar
Government should only be concerned about the well-being of the younger generation growing up and not about how the introit or vice versa of an establishment are going to be affected. As a suggestion Government could send out a questionnaire to all families and get the feed back. That should settle what the real responsible people having young children under their care really want.
avatar
Isn't it obvious that some establishments particularly those that mainly cater for youngsters don't take kindly to the proposal to raise the drinking age to 18? Does one expect the owners of such establishments to cherish a proposal which leads to a drop in their business? But, would these people agree that their 17 year-old children should be allowed to consume alcohol in public? Laws are not made for the convenience of such patrons but for the protection of the vulnerable under-eighteens.
avatar
Joseph MELI
How does one differentiate between a 17 year-old and a 18 year old?In any event, who will differentiate and enforce the law if changed as it not being enforced now -so how will this help matters?