Architect defends modern design for new Valletta Hotel

Chris Briffa, the architect of the proposed Mattia Preti Hotel –which seeks to integrate a new contemporary building with a 16th century period house – has defended the use of modern architecture in Valletta.

The proposed hotel perched on San Salvatore bastions in Marsamxett consists of two main interventions: the restoration and conversion of the old house (which is typical of Mannerist architecture) into the hotel’s common areas and two, new buildings located on two presently undeveloped sites. The hotel is being proposed by the Valletta local council.

Briffa insists that Valletta only became an urban and architectural gem for the simple reason that its buildings were always innovative for their time.

According to Briffa, every new great building in Valletta was designed to break new ground in terms of its function, style, technology and resources… and this is what makes this city so special.

“Laparelli’s planning was avant-garde for his time… Gerolamo Cassar did not design St John’s Co-Cathedral in the Gothic style, but in the Mannerist style that was ‘ultramodern’ at the time.”

But he regrets that this tradition has been discontinued.

“We have the duty to continue this legacy we have inherited and stop being so quixotically historicist. Valletta’s regeneration is not about turning it into an open-air museum, or a money-draining restoration project, but into a vibrant European capital that embraces reality and improvement for its inhabitants and visitors.”

He also refers to the acceptance of modern architecture in historical landscaped by UNESCO (which is responsible for monitoring world heritage sites like Valletta). He quotes director Francesco Bandarin, who defines a historic urban landscape as “an expression of the change of cultural and social values over the course of time.” 

“In this context, contemporary architecture must be understood as an integral part of the cultural continuation of our historic centers – not buildings frozen in time, but a continuously flourishing environment catering for modern needs.”

One major concern on the project is that it will have a major impact on views from the other side of the harbour. Briffa points out that throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Marsamxett saw particularly acute development as a  number of buildings were demolished to make way for apartment blocks. The old town house earmarked for restoration has escaped this fate, creating an infill site lodged between two much higher buildings.

The new hotel will be built in the only infill site on the entire Marsamxett coast.

“We simply drew a line on the top of the two adjoining buildings, which made the entire roofline – from Biagio Steps to St Paul’s Cathedral – of uniform height.”

By utilising this void, the hotel will have just enough rooms  to be commercially viable, the architect insists.

The main aim of the design is the visual integration with the adjacent buildings and fortifications – particularly when viewed from across the harbour. This required an aesthetic that had to be primarily centered on the use of stone.

“From Sliema and Manoel Island, we imagined prevailing areas of stone and vertically proportioned openings that merge happily with the surrounding windows and the predominant ‘gallarjia’ cityscape.”

The new construction will be physically detached from the old Mattia Preti house through the creation of a pedestrian access to Old Theatre Lane. 

“Glass bridges will link the two buildings above this public walkway, and a glazed back-façade on Old Theatre Lane will introduce the energy of a busy hotel atrium into an otherwise very narrow and dreary alleyway.”

With the site located above the Valletta-Sliema ferry dock, the architect is proposing a public lift accessible from the street but within the hotel’s footprint, connecting Marsamxett Road to the shoreline below, via the existing war shelters within Salvatore Bastion.

“This will provide a mechanical vertical access to guests, visitors and locals arriving from across the harbour.”

The adjacent and currently derelict water polo pitch will also be repaired and converted into the hotel’s lido and beach facilities. But he does not exclude reinstating the presently defunct water polo club.

Ray Bondin expresses concern on hotel design

When contacted by MaltaToday, Ray Bondin, President of the UNESCO’s International Committee on Historic Towns and Villages acknowledged that modern architecture has a place in historical cities but expressed reservations on the design which is being proposed for Mattia Preti Hotel.

“While the use of contemporary architecture is accepted in historical cities, this should be compatible with other buildings and should not clash with its surroundings as was the case with the Law courts building.”

Bondin also argued that since Valletta is a world heritage site, any development of a certain scale which impinges on the city’s architectural fabric has to be notified to UNESCO.

“Personally I would prefer if the building includes traditional features like wooden balconies and doors. One can still have a contemporary design which includes some traditional features.”

avatar
Mamma mia what an eyesore! Hope MEPA shoot it down.
avatar
Joseph Catania
"that embraces reality and improvement for its inhabitants and visitors." The Maltese do embrace reality. And the reality is that your proposed plan is NOT an impovement.
avatar
I can only think of one word to describe the proposed plans 'HORRENDOUS' ... The stunning Maltese balconies will all be covered not to mention the total ruin of the view visible from across the bay and the change of the skyline as has already happened with the project in Tigne - complete chaos !!!
avatar
It is surprising that Mr Debono did not mention in his article the strong arguments against this proposed hotel which I outlined in my letter to the Editor of Maltatoday on 13 March.  The proposed hotel which will rise 16.34 metres above Old Theatre Lane (which is not even 2 metres wide) will have serious adverse effects on the inhabitants leaving them without light and air.  It is even more surprising that he has refrained from mentioning the opinion of the Cultural Heritage Advisory Committee (see below) which clearly states that any new building on the site should not exceed the current height - a sensible opinion because it puts the well-being of the Valletta inhabitants before the interests of architects, building developers and tourists. Ray Bondin is right to express his concern with regard to Valletta’s commitments to Unesco.  Malta is also signatory of the European Convention for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Europe: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/Resources/Conventions/conventions_en.asp through which Malta undertakes to “facilitate whenever possible in the town and country planning process the conservation and use of certain buildings whose intrinsic importance would not warrant protection within the meaning of Article 3, paragraph 1, of this Convention but which are of interest from the point of view of their setting in the urban or rural environment and of the quality of life;”. So Mr Debono, let us have a more objective article in Maltatoday and Chris Briffa, let us see a new proposal which  respects not only the architectural fabric of Valletta, but more importantly the quality of life of its citizens.   PA4605/10 chac mtg 648 bid-data 25/03/11 Il-Kumitat mhux qed isib oġġezzjoni għat-twaqqigħ tal-parti li inbnit wara il-gwerra iżda il-kumplament tal-bini għandu jiġi preservat. L-għoli tal-bini ma għandux jaċċedi l-għoli eżistenti. Il-Kumitat qed joġġezzjona li isir il-passaġġ li jagħti għal-Water Polo Pitch.
avatar
What you call "modern" architecture has a funny tendency to look awful. That we pounce on the awfulness does not necessarily make us quixotic or historicist. We are just frustrated that our modern architects can't seem to live up to Gilormu's stunning legacy. Modern architects have much to answer for - the destruction of Sliema's special beauty in a matter of decades, for example, has left people with a profound distrust of architects who want a finger in the pie of our architectural and natural heritage.
avatar
Il-Perit is right regarding Girolamo Cassar's design which was avant-garde and very appropriate. Il-Perit's design is not exactly avant-garde but it is definitely a sick joke.
avatar
Another monstrosity which will block the view for the apartments. The residents should go up in arms against this hideous monstrosity. What architects is the University churning out these days?
avatar
Helenio Galea
O M G!
avatar
Literal translation of first comment to come to one's mind in Maltese: "This architect ... his face and his rear are identical, and if there is the slightest difference it goes in favour of his rear."
avatar
Malta needs new architectural impulses but does it have to be in Valletta?. Laparelli and Cassar may have created a new style for Valletta but that is exactly why it is so special and it is exactly the reason why it needs to be preserved. The capital is already in a bad state in some areas and it only takes one or two exceptions ( our PM has already stamped his ego on one of these ) to allow a systematic defacing of the ‘old’ architecture, replacing it with a more modernistic appearance. If this experiment really succeeds leaves much to be desired. After all face-lifting and beauty operations are very much in vogue but please spare Valletta from such a plight. Let’s be honest, Tigne may be upmarket but looks like a slum area from across the harbour and I’m sure that the architect must now be wondering why everything looked so good on paper.
avatar
This is simply the continued destruction of not only Malta as a whole by speculators but also of our capital city built by gentlemen for gentlemen. First we had the city gate without a gate, a parliament on stilts and the topless theatre as has been indicated by others and now we have this new modern hotel with new style architecture jarring with the old Valletta style. When is this destruction going to stop?