Updated | Government 'happy with charity, when what we need is solidarity' – PL

The Labour Party called on government to state whether it voted for the EU’s final decision yesterday, or whether it abstained like Italy did.

Labour MP and spokesperson on immigration Michael Falzon said the way the European Union has acted so far, is a "far cry" from its talk on solidarity, when reacting to the voluntary burden-sharing policy by EU member states on Monday.

“Lawrence Gonzi and his government are weak to accept a plan which does not give any form of solid solidarity,” Falzon said, adding that “government is pleasing itself with other countries’ charity, when what we really need is true solidarity, which is our right.”

Falzon added government should declare how it voted in Luxembourg on the council conclusions of Monday’s justice and home affairs council, or whether it abstained like Italy did.

EU Commissioner for justice and home affairs Cecilia Malmstrom said the council had approved to prolong the pilot resettlement programme for migrants with temporary protection in Malta. However, the European Council reiterated that it was still premature for the solidarity mechanism to be invoked.

Falzon hit out at Gonzi for “lauding” the voluntary help offered by EU countries, saying it only goes to show how “weak Gonzi is when he comes to defend Malta’s national interest at EU level”.

Referring to the immigration solidarity mechanism, Directive 55, Falzon said it discriminates against Malta. Article 5 of Directive 55/2001 enables the granting of temporary international protection orders in cases of large influxes of people into the EU. 

"The declarations that the solidarity mechanism is only activated when all EU countries are affected by the immigration influx completely ignores Malta's geographical position and the island's size," he said.

“By what has been said amongst the EU fora, it shows that some countries are expecting Malta to act as a shield against the immigration wave,” Falzon added.

Without referring to any specific country, Falzon praised those countries which, without any inhibitions, place their national interest at the top of their agenda.

“The PL believes that whilst respecting human dignity, Malta should never let others abuse of it and we should safeguard our national interest, just like other countries are doing,” Falzon concluded.

Meanwhile, in a statement today, the Nationalist Party hit out at the position taken by Labour leader Joseph Muscat on the Italian blockade of Lampedusa as insensitive and populist.

“Instead of supporting the Maltese government’s decision to support human life as its main priority, Muscat supported Italy and said Malta should have done the same.”

Reacting to the statement, the Justice and Home Affairs Ministry said that the EU is already showing “direct and concrete” solidarity with Malta on the issue of illegal immigration.

Referring to the PL’s statement the Ministry said that “it is sadly built upon arguments that are incorrect, inexact, and completely wrong.”

It said that that the declaration made by the EU’s Council of Ministers for Internal Affairs put in motion the first steps of “concrete” solidarity and assistance with Malta and the immigrants.

The Ministry added that, as was already reported, a number of Member States already showed signs that they would be participating in the already-existing Burden Sharing Agreement.

The Ministry however conceded that there is more that can be done beyond t his “marked step forward.” It also hit out at the Opposition for relying on “mistaken sources” in saying that Italy abstained from voting on the Council’s declaration.

The Ministry said that Italy had actually voted in favour of the declaration, despite how  the country wanted the final declaration to change so that a project of solidarity for Italy can be established as well.

This did not happen precisely because the other Member States did not agree, the Ministry said, adding that they declared that there are fundamental differences between Malta and Italy’s situations.

It also refuted claims that indications were given during the meeting that other members states are waiting for the situation to deteriorate further before taking action. “Neither is it true that our position as a country was not recognised, or that Malta needs to prevent more people (immigrants) from arriving here,” the ministry said.

In a jab at statements by Opposition leader Joseph Muscat days ago, the ministry said that it is “ironic that so much admiration is being shown to certain countries that is being described as a defender of national interest that nevertheless had to receive 25,000 economic migrants from Tunisia that it could not send back.”

avatar
Dear Car u tond Never watch Net TV (sat reception only ) and assure you that these spins are purely my own. I am not backing the government either since the we've had enough hot air coming from that side as well. Use your own objectivity about this matter and you will realise that as far as dignity is concerned other EC countries especially Italy are the ones are shedding their responsibilities with their spinless attitude to a international tragedy. Mr Muscat's comments are simply a badly veiled ploy to gain political momentum. If you relate to such claims then so be it but as far as I am concerned, it has simply driven a wedge in our resolve to do what right and show the kind of maturity that is presently lacking across the EU. Judging from rush of sympathy the PL comments are generating, are we that much better than the rest of them?
avatar
@not amused: I am not amused by the malicious spins you seem to quote from Net TV. The truth is that we have a spineless government, who is not even taken seriously by his right- wing friends; Italy, France UK, Denmark and Sweden. Malta has lost its dignity and it is being taken for a ride. It has become so silly with the PN trumpeting victory after victory- with voluntary burden sharing the result of which, every Maltese can feel and see!
avatar
If the government has nothing to hide it should come clean and state how it voted in Luxembourg. I am sure that at some point this information will come out because it should not be difficult for the PL to make its own enquiries in Luxembourg.
avatar
Who told you that Joseph Muscat sided with the Italian? Why do you and your party always try to blame Joseph for every mishap happening in Malta? Ippokriti!! You were the ones pushing for our entry in the EU. This is the result you never thought of. So much for the solidarity and synergy among member states. So much for the cheap talk about being equal members. Even with a firm government it will be difficult, never mind having such a spinless government. What common ground are you refering to? To your rude ministers, common ground simply means agreeing to whatever they believe in. But sorry we are proud to be Maltese and not lick ass to forigners like you. Finally Joseph NEVER said let them drown. There are other methods to force the other EU members to help. Like using our Veto, if need be, at every opportunity.
avatar
This is the typical political hot air that our politicians are so renown for. PL respects human dignity but attach a big BUT to it....what a cheap shot. If national interest is their real interest than it is their responsibility to create a common front with the government to pressure the EU and especially italy to adhere strictly to the EC own ground rules. Of course this will be no pushover but it is opportunity to show that Malta stands for humane principals and is ready to fight it's own rights without neglecting human values and dignity. The PL, by siding with italy who is so blantantly leaving others to carry the buck and blackmailing Malta in the process while citing national interest, is just a typical doppio facia tactic. The only goal, PL is interested in, is by fermenting controversy and creating a scary scenario that Malta will be drowned by illegal emigration caused by our government's weaknesses. What a load of baloney.