PBS enforces BA code only during elections

PBS says "concerted attack" on Where's Everybody presenters is all about audience share.

The Public Broadcasting Services has stated it only enforces the impartiality of its TV presenters during elections, referring to accusations made by Labour MP Gino Cauchi that the national broadcaster was not adhering to Section 19 of the Broadcasting Act regulating the standards and practices of broadcasters in the national TV station.

In an unsigned statement, PBS said that Section 19 “is not enforceable” by the Broadcasting Authority but that TVM enforces it when there is some kind of election in the country.

“It is ironic that when Lou Bondì said he was in favour of divorce, Labour said nothing because Bondì’s position was congruent with Labour’s,” PBS said.

“This concerted attack on popular TVM presenters Peppi Azzopardi, Lou Bondì and TVM news has nothing to do with balance in broadcasting but with audiences. We have improved audience share and attracting bette quality productions. These have a negative impact on competing TV stations who lose audience and advertising revenue, which PBS believes is the real reason for this harsh, orchestrated campaign.”

Labour MP Gino Cauchi has asked the Broadcasting Authority to get the Public Broadcasting Services in line with broadcasting legislation, over its accusations of partiality by Where’s Everybody directors Lou Bondì and Peppi Azzopardi.

Speaking after an admission by Azzopardi of having coached Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando to face down former Labour leader Alfred Sant in the run-up to the 2008 election, Cauchi said the BA had to enforce section 19 of the Broadcasting Act’s subsidiary legislation on standards and practice. [READ – opens PDF]

The legislation states that those known to the public primarily as presenters of current affairs programmes on PBS must be seen to be impartial. “It is important that no off-air activity, including writing, the giving of interviews or the making of speeches, leads to any doubt about their objectivity on-air. If such presenters or reporters publicly express personal views off-air on controversial issues, then their on-air role may be severely compromised.”

The law further states that such presenters must not state their voting preferences, express themselves in favour of any policy in a matter of current party debate, advocate any particular position on an issue of current public controversy or debate, or exhort a change in high-profile public policy.

“It is the BA’s obligation to see that the law is followed. PBS appears to be out of control and degenerating into an arm of the Nationalist Party,” Cauchi said. 

Cauchi said Labour had already complained to PBS chairman Joseph Mizzi, copying articles from Bondì’s personal blog in which he criticised Labour policies, MPs and the Opposition leader, but had not received any acknowledgement from the station.

He also said that Bondì had declared himself publicly on Net TV that he would vote for the Nationalist Party, and that Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando had testified in court that Peppi Azzopardi had coached him in how to face down Alfred Sant during a Broadcasting Authority press conference.

“Azzopardi is therefore admitting he had a crucial role in coaching PN members during the election. Additionally, he produced influential programmes during the 2008 elections, including debates between the two leaders, that were crucial in making people’s minds up,” Cauchi said.

Azzopardi’s role in coaching Pullicino Orlando during the Mistra scandal was revealed in court during the sitting for a libel suit against Mediatoday managing editor Saviour Balzan, by Richard Cachia Caruana, Malta’s permanent representative to the EU.

avatar
“It is ironic that when Lou Bondì said he was in favour of divorce, Labour said nothing because Bondì’s position was congruent with Labour’s,” PBS said. . What a poor excuse, if anybody was to raise an objection it should have been gonziPN who took a stand against divorce and the church. But then Bondi is one of their boys and better let the issue die than giving the YES lobby more ammo. Antoin vella grow up and learn. tHE PN IS DEAD LONG LIVE gonziPN
avatar
@antoine vella By pointing at some wrongly used word as an argument only shows what a S-owl you are and only makes your argument more feeble. Grow up, (despite your age)
avatar
@Antoine Vella Yeah..thanks for pointing that out. However your incapability to look at the facts without your tinged specs makes your problem more difficult and more serious than mine. The PN and its acolytes, including yourself, are doing their utmost to shield the party so that it will hopefully remain in government coming next election, not for the sake of their party, but because they're afraid that their nicely feathered nests will be disrupted.
avatar
James Grech, listen. If someone asks you what you want this Christmas tell them to give you an English dictionary and then look up the word 'thwarted'. . Forsi, ma tafx kif, titgħallem xi ħaġa.
avatar
Joseph Sant
If PBS insists on flouting the law there's precious little anyone can do about it - except for one very significant and practical thing. Boycotts worked very well in the 80s - they can do so again. . If you disagree with PBS policy boycott it, boycott WE programmes, and more importantly boycott those companies that advertise on WE programmes. If you want things to change YOU have to take the first step.
avatar
@Antoine Vella I bet that you're as thwarted as Bondi and Azzopardi. How stupid can a person be if he/she cannot understand what is being depicted day-in-day-out by ppl like Bondi and Azzopardi? How exceedingly stupid will such a person feel when time passes and his/her thwarted, sick comments can still be found on the Web with a click of a button?
avatar
The reference to the divorce campaign is particularly relevant because the same rules quoted by ex-PBS newscaster Gino Cauchi states that: . "presenters must not . . . advocate any particular position on an issue of current public controversy or debate, or exhort a change in high-profile public policy." There is no mention of political parties here. . This is exactly what the divorce issue was all about and Joseph Muscat publicly encouraged Lou Bondi to take an active part in "advocating a particular position in a public controversy/debate". . This whole distasteful incident is yet another object lesson in Mintoffian hypocrisy and double standards.
avatar
Why is PBS mentioning the divorce issue? The PL did not have any political position about it, only the PN tinged it blue. It should never have been addressed through such political interference from the PN side. However other issues which Bondi and Co address on their programs are biased and it has often been the case that these individuals passed on thwarted messages wrt ongoing national issues that placed the PL in bad light. This is what happens when a party is left too long in power. Individuals take it in their own hands to ensure that their niches are not embezzled by spinning programs to ensure that their party is kept in power even longer.