Different forms of residency make defining residency ‘problematic’ – de Marco
PN leader for party affairs says judicial protest on citizenship scheme superseded by introduction of 12-month residency period.
The judicial protest filed by the Nationalist Party to forewarn IIP applicants that citizenship came with an expiry date has been superseded by a new legal notice introducing the 12-month residency period, PN deputy leader for party affairs Mario de Marco said today.
Addressing a press conference urging the government to come up with an action plan for job creation, de Marco was pressed by journalists to say whether the Opposition would be a filing a fresh parliamentary motion to revoke Legal Notice 470 - the latest legal notice that enjoys the European Commission's approval.
"We will find the best mechanism by which our proposals can be included," de Marco said, refusing to go into the technicalities of the matter.
According to the Maltese Citizenship Act, a legal notice cannot be amended, but annulled and a fresh one issued in its place. In fact, a clause in Legal Notice 470 repeals Legal Notice 450, the first legal notice to be issued under which the citizenship scheme was regulated.
"We want the legal notice to lay down clearly what's the genuine link with Malta. The government must be humble enough to listen to our proposals. Is it ready to listen to what we have to say?" de Marco said.
He pointed to a number of "grey areas" in the legal notice, including the fact that the residency period applied only to the main applicant.
The Opposition wants the legal notice to lay down the specifics for an "effective residency". While the government said it would be making use of residency as is applied today, legally it is very difficult to narrow down a definition of residency.
"What is the checklist that defines residency? Today there are different forms of residency for different purposes. This makes defining residency problematic," de Marco said.




