‘We’re not going to be another Arriva’, says Scottish CEO

Scottish bus company McGill’s withdrew from public transport bid citing lack of information on current state of transport company

The chief executive of Scottish bus firm McGill's vowed that his company "was not going to be another Arriva" when the company was not being furnished with enough financial information for it to make a serious bid for Malta's public transport operation.

Ralph Roberts told MaltaToday that McGill's Bus Service, of Greenock, Scotland, demanded to know as much information as possible - namely the value of assets, liabilities, staff complement and their salaries, amongst other crucial information - before bidding on the expression of interest issued by Transport Malta.

Roberts said that even on the basis of his guesswork, McGill's was looking at an operation costing some €35 million with the expectation of an equal amount in turnover.

"At that kind of 1:1 gearing, you're looking at a very, very expensive business to run... you ask yourself why Transport Malta should have set such a high bar in the first place. On our part, everything has to be right before tying up so much of our own cash and assets for this business. We have a corporate social responsibility not to do anything that might harm our operation in Scotland," Roberts said.

The chief executive said that TM had not been forthcoming enough on the information it needed to make a serious bid within the next six weeks.

Roberts surmised, on details available from the share transfer from Arriva Malta to Transport Malta and its new public transport company, an estimated €20 million asset base and another €5 million needed for start-up capital and cash flow. He also said that a €10 million guarantee was required in the form of a letter of comfort.

"Seeing that we could expect €35 million in revenues over the years, we felt this was a very expensive business to run... I ask myself, why should I tie up €10 million of my assets? I would need at least €900,000 every year for the next decade or so to make good for that."

Arriva Malta sold its entire operation to Transport Malta at the start of 2014, leading to the creation of a nationalised public transport service.

Roberts said that the current EOI asks bidders to indicate whether they want to purchase the entire company and its asset base, or whether they are interested in acquiring an exclusive concession by forming a new company.

"Taking over the company means you have to know the total value of the current assets and liabilities and employees' salary - the company has now been operational since January, and the share transfer agreement from Arriva Malta only gives you the basis for guesswork," Roberts said."

Malta Public Transport Services Ltd absorbed €7.9 million in total debts when it took over Arriva Malta.

The government's call for expression of interests for the operation of the new bus service closes on 7 April.

Earlier yesterday, the Sunday Herald of Scotland reported Roberts saying that his "gut feeling" was that excessive state interference would prevent the firm from running a profitable service.

"Their first option was to have someone take over an effectively nationalised service and assume the assets and liabilities. While they made that clear up front, they didn't say what this amounted to, so we had no idea what the liabilities were, what the assets were, what the revenue was, or the patronage numbers," Roberts told the Sunday Herald.

avatar
Well in the ABC of business takeover, the first thing you is to carry out a due diligence of the company being taken over. TM is asking bidders to take over the existing company. Any serious company would have to carry out its own due diligence. This has not happened and therefore nobody should be surprised with the Scottish company's actions.
avatar
Joseph MELI
Another point not mentioned here is that clearly McGills CEO ,Roberts ,does not his company want 'to be another Arriva ' as he still has connections with Arriva and possibly sought counsel from that company ? As he worked for that company in a managerial capacity for long enough in the psst - a fact strangely not brought up!
avatar
Joseph MELI
'Lack of information 'is clearly a highly prevalent issue here and try being a Maltese citizen when requesting information from a governmental entity or else getting some information and full-disclosure clarity on the IIP scheme
avatar
Mhux ghalhekk il-Ministru Mizzi qed jipprova jigbor il-bicciet li hallew l-Arriva bis-sahha ta' Austin Gatt sabiex min jerga jigi biex jopera t-trasport pubbliku f'Malta ma jispiccax imdamdam. S'intendi, l-akkolti tal-PN bhas-soltu qed jaqilbu kollox ta' taht fuq u jwahhlu fil-gvern Malti li mhux jimxi sew. Min ghandu wiccu u l-warrani l-istess, il-kelma misthija ma' jafx x'hini.
avatar
I was the first to request Minister Mizzi and TM to reply to this company's claims, as I did not wish Malta turned into a not even close comparison to a GonziPN scenario. TM were very quick to clarify the situation. They noted that they were acting in line with (1) the call for expression of interest, (2) that queries were still being received (3) and that they did not want to treat preferentially any one potential bidder. Now I would ask this company's representative to substantiate his assertions in the media. Or was all this due to a prospected "quickie" which did not materialise? It is very easy to throw mud when one does not get matters his way.