Muscat shies away from fight with Catholic Church over divorce

Labour leader Joseph Muscat has pledged that he did not want to have a conflict with the Catholic Church over the issue of divorce

Asked about Fr Anton Gouder’s warning on RTK that voting in favour of divorce would constitute a “moral sin” during a wide-ranging one-hour interview on party station One Radio this moring by Standard Publications’ Limited Editor-in-Chief Noel Grima, Muscat said: “I do not look forward again at the stoking of a fight between the PL and the church.

“However there should be reciprocal respect between both sides of the argument,” he insisted.

“I hope that Fr Gouder’s comment was blown out of proportion,” Muscat noted.  He explained that this debate on divorce was “a very healthy signal for our young democracy”.

“I do not agree with the Nevada type of divorce, where you get it with e-mail, but with divorce legislation that safeguards the interest of children,” Muscat insisted.

The divorce proposal made by Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando in his private members bill allows divorce only after four years of marriage and is based on the Irish divorce legislation.

This was the first time ever that Grima has interviewed Muscat on One Radio, which is usually reserved for “safer” journalists from L-Orizzont or Super One.

Muscat explained how the divorce question “surely had to rise somehow.  We were living  a lie. I have always spoken in favour of divorce, which can help those families in difficulties” he said.

“Yes the PL suffered because of mortal sin,” Muscat recalled. “A whole generation of the sixties was lost but for the Church on the other hand they had agreed with the Church’s social teachings,” he added.

“For these people, it was like choosing between their mother and their father,” Muscat explained.

On the Delimara power station extension case, Muscat explained that the evidence against BWSC was so strong that it is “cast in stone as seen by the auditor-general’s report on the matter as well as by the European Commission’s infringement letter. “For me it’s already very serious that the EU has raised these doubts,” he insisted.

“I had been given advice not to mention corruption, however corruption is a tax that is paid by you,” the Labour leader charged.  “In a time of austerity, there is a new realisation that economically, we should not continue paying for corruption,” he added.

There were various people who were asking the PL to come out with its proposals. “We will be coming out with in the future,” he pledged.

“How will we be different from the Gonzi Government?” he asked. “We will not tolerate what Gonzi tolerates now!” Muscat insisted.

I will not be a Labour Prime Minister and not investigate what happened fully! I cannot tell the Maltese to pay for huge taxes and then not take care of what happened in the BWSC case,” he pledged.

Since the contract was awarded 4 days before the 8 March 2008 general election, “it would have tied a Labour Government if it was elected,” he lamented.

He reiterated his position that a new Labour government would re-open the case, investigate it fully and give an amnesty to those businessmen who provide information about politicians who committed irregularities in this case.

“The PN fired a major on €80. On €200 million it is not going to do anything,” Muscat asked.

“There was no multiple oversight about the adjudication process. How could a sub-altern sign the contract?,” Grima asked Muscat.

Muscat explained how the Auditor-General had highlighted this deficiency in its audit report.

He revealed how in 2006, the cabinet “had come to a realisation that a new power station extension would have been based on gas.  However the Government went for heavy fuel oil.

“It’s as if instead of going to a blackberry, you opted for a simple telephone,” Muscat quipped.

The PL leader explained how EC Commissioner Michel Barnier had highlighted the fact that the Maltese Government had only taken one exception from the EU directive concerning HFO, “but did not take an exception for gas.  That’s why the EC is insisting that the tender was discriminatory!,” the Labour leader insisted.

“The Maltese taxpayer, as well as those who are paying high utility bills from their nose, is angry with this behaviour,” Muscat added.

Asked by Grima whether the Maltese taxpayer was “paying now for the present, and the past with the utility bills”, Muscat quipped: “We are already paying for tomorrow’s utility bills with the Government’s decision to go for heavy fuel oil power station!”

Muscat had harsh words for MRA, the energy regulator, accusing it of being “a puppet regulator. I waited some time before pronouncing myself on this; however when the MRA had approved the utility tariffs and then the Government came out with the compensation offer almost immediately after is a clear example of this,” the Labour leader insisted.

The Government should find funds to assist not only the lower classes but also the middle class,” he warned. “The Government’s policies are leading to the destruction of the middle class, which works hard,” the Labour leader insisted.

The energy vouchers were “a travesty”, Muscat insisted, because they cannot be used it to pay the utility bill unless you pay for the entire bill. And it is these kind of people who often cannot afford to pay their whole utility bill,” he lamented.

“And then you have to go to Luqa to pay the energy bills there, taking two buses to get there from Valletta.  This is a travesty of social justice!,” he charged.

Muscat recalled how a woman had explained how her husband needed a particular type of treatment. First she had to pay 18% VAT on the machine since it was not classified as medicine.

In July she received a €400 bill which gave her “a huge blow”. A few days later she received an €800 bill. “They did not even go out this summer, and if something happened to her, then that family would be in dire straits,” Muscat lamented.

Muscat revealed that the new oncology hospital at Mater Dei was going to cost the taxpayer €59 million instead of the €6 million originally forecast by Gonzi when he negotiated with Skanska over the completion of the hospital.

“I hope that it all goes for equipment and not for something else,” Muscat insisted. “If we give them the best treatment, well and good.

“However somebody should take responsibility for how the costs for the oncology hospital have risen to €25 million, then €40 million, and then €59 million,” Muscat insisted.

Muscat also lambasted the decision to re-integrate Malta Industrial Parks Limited with Malta Enterprise after merging six years ago.

“Last Thursday, we learnt that six years after divorcing, they will now re-marry and transfer from San Gwann to St Luke’s Hospital,” Muscat said sarcastically.

“Where will we now build factories, in Sliema?,” he asked.

He also slammed the Nationalist Government’ s choice of St Luke’s Hospital to house only the ME offices and restaurant. “That is a prime property site,”.

Finally, asked by Grima whether we were not going to have a “Muscat PL” during the next electoral campaign, Muscat replied: “I believe that the party should be above the leader.”

Muscat recognised that “change is not easy.  You have to take criticism in your stride and never forget the finishing line.

“I took over a party which was so demoralised of losing that we had lost the will of winning. We have to be proud of our past while apologising to those who we have failed,” he explained.

He also called for a “mentality change” in the PL:“ we are not contesting electron merely to contest and win elections, however to bring about real change,” Muscat insisted.

A parry which always thought about itself was “always bound to lose continuously,” he warned.

Labour had to attract “those people who might not necessarily have voted Labour in the past. We have to satisfy not only the principles but also the primary needs of the Maltese people in health, education, and civil rights,” he insisted.

Muscat announced that the PL would have “new people” who would be contesting the elections with the PL. “We will break with the past and offer a hope for the Maltese people as against the PN’s fear tactics during the next general elections,” Muscat pledged.

“We have a tough challenge. I will put all my energy and determination to offer hope to our country,” the Labour leader concluded his one-hour interview.

avatar
"Muscat shies away from fight with Catholic Church over divorce." What is morally wrong cannot be politically right. In the 1950's and 1960;s and 1970's the religious- political battles were necessary because the MLP had true grit about defending the working class from a dysfunctional political system dictated by the Catholic Church of Archbishop Gonzi at the detriment of the non connected. Peopke were sent to jail or diagnosed as mentally ill because they had unpleasant reactions towards their parish priests. The MLP had leadership with great determination and who were not afraid to swim upstream to expose corruption, inequality, social justice and religious interference in state affairs. Fifty years later corruption is rampart, inequality and social justice are administered according to your voting record and religious interference in state affairs is once again visible by declaring that a vote for divorce is a mortal sin. DIVORCE should be legislated by the state to protect WOMEN and CHILDREN involved. Quote from the book:-THE POWER AND THE GLORY Inside the Dark Heart of John Paul II‘s Vatican by DAVID YALLOP Chapter 11 Thou shalt not………. Page 411 The Catholic Church hardly ever recognizes a divorce or a second marriage while the original spouse is still alive. The situation for those wishing to remarry and remain good Catholics is to seek an annulment in which the Church after due process rules that a perfectly valid marriage never existed in the first place. Such an arrangement is inevitably open to abuse. In Italy on 3 July 1974 Claudio Cesareo and marina Volpato contracted a marriage at a religious ceremony held in the parish Church of Santa Maria in Trastevere. Near the end of 1980 Claudio left the marital home to continue an adulterous affair. He continued sleeping with his wife and ten months later he returned to Marina shortly before she gave birth to their first child. In 1984 a second child was born. Both children were christened and the father arranged for their first communion and subsequently his elder daughter’s confirmation. A devout man, Cesareo attended a pre-marriage course with Marina during which the couple became fully conversant with the various religious services including the celebration of various wedding anniversaries and religious funeral services. He also insisted that he and his wife should go to the shrine of Medjugorje in Yugoslavia and kneel in prayer before the Holy Virgin. In 1993 Claudio again left the marital home, this time permanently. He set up home with a Danish girl and this relationship produced a son. Marina eventually accepted that the marriage was at an end and anxious that her two young daughters should at least be materially provided for by their father, sued for civil divorce during which she had every expectation that the court would make adequate provision for the children. In an attempt to avoid alimony payments, Claudio turned to the Vicariate of Vatican City, seeking an annulment. Initially his grounds were that though he had gone through a religious ceremony he did not and never had believed in God. Advised by the court officials that in light of his attention to a wide variety of religious activities the contention that he was an atheist was going to be rather hard to establish, Claudio changed his position. He ‘acquired’ a witness who stated that before the wedding Cesareo had told him that he did not believe in the indissolubility of the Wedding Sacrament. Cases such as this are helped considerably if money is placed in the right places; Marina’s father Sergio would insist that this case was no different. The Vatican Tribunal found in favor of Claudio and magically his marriage was annulled. Not withstanding the physical evidence of a wife and two children, his marriage had never existed and as such no alimony was due. The court also ruled that, if she wanted marina was free to get married but Claudio was forbidden to ‘remarry without previously consulting the local ordinary’. A few years before this sad tale reached its conclusion, cardinal Ratzinger in yet another edict from his office to bishops throughout the world stated that divorced Catholics in unsanctioned second marriages cannot receive Communion unless they renounce sex. Demonstrably, any estranged couple wishing to avoid a life of celibacy should abandon divorce plans, ‘acquire a couple pf persuasive witnesses and head for the Vatican courts. In January 2002while addressing members of the Roman Rota the Pope suggested to the lawyers gathered before him that they might invoke their rights of conscience to avoid becoming involved in divorce cases. One eminent Italian lawyer was heard to mutter, ‘What–and lose two thirds of my income?’ By March 2004 only three countries still maintained a complete ban on divorce and one of them, Chile, the only country in the Americas where the total ban applied, had initiated legislation to legalised divorce. It had been a long and bitter fight with the resistance headed by the Catholic Church. Before the end of the year, divorce was legalized dealing a stunning and humiliating defeat to the Church. Only Malta and the Philippines remain as divorce-free zones. The sooner the PL takes a stand against this administration, the sooner the Maltese will believe that this leadership are not practicing Politics of betrayal.
avatar
Alfred Galea
What do you think Joseph should do to bring this government down?? Revolution?? NOTHING will make Gonzi call an early election, it's not the PN's style, they'll milk it until the very last day of their mandate.
avatar
The archbishop should have sent Gouder not Montebello to Mexico. It would have made more sense. I wonder when Gouder will come out with his own Syllabus of Errors. It will no doubt be as silly as that of Pius IX. Incidentally, these are some of the propositions condemned by Pius IX in his Syllabus: "67. By the law of nature, the marriage tie is not indissoluble, and in many cases divorce properly so called may be decreed by the civil authority. -- Ibid.; Allocution "Acerbissimum," Sept. 27, 1852. 68. The Church has not the power of establishing diriment impediments of marriage, but such a power belongs to the civil authority by which existing impediments are to be removed. -- Damnatio "Multiplices inter," June 10, 1851." The Syllabus also condemned free speech and Bible societies. Infallible I hear you ask?
avatar
Dear Wenzu,
avatar
Dear Wenzu,
avatar
He seems to be happy being the great leader of the PL party. Yo! Listen up - you will get the country by default. Get off your ass and bring this government down - PL carries guilt for the present situation for being such a laughable opposition, for being distracted on internal leadership fights while the country sinks further in corruption and for being generally clueless or choosing to be clueless.
avatar
Patrick Calleja
Compared to the plague of corruption and "anything goes" mentality concooted by GonziPN, Joseph Muscat is a breath of fresh air!
avatar
dear Hon. Mr.Joseph Muscat, can you please state exactly you as the malta labour party leader -say exactly and make a promise to all those who are and will be in need of divorce what you exactly willl do if you win the next election? i know i read what you said but can you garantee it ? or if the man as he was the only one in parlament who had the guts to propese it in parlament, why not join forces together and vote for it now? are you all cautious ? and what is the reason for if so? well i admire jeffrey pulicino orlando and who is like him-because he is not afraid of the dark- thanks
avatar
Keith Goodlip
"It's SO easy to sit on the fence".