After Sliema impeachment, PN goes on the attack: ‘Labour councillors’ abstention supported Nikki Dimech’

Nationalists accuse Labour of not being true to zero-tolerance policy on corruption, by abstaining on the Nikki Dimech impeachment.

The Nationalist Party has found itself vindicated with the successful impeachment of former Sliema mayor Nikki Dimech, choosing to hit out at Labour for abstaining on the vote of no confidence.

In a statement, the PN is accusing Labour of putting paid to its ‘zero-tolerance’ policy on corruption, by refusing to oust Dimech, who is charged with having asked for commissions on a council contract.

The commissions were allegedly demanded from Stephen Buhagiar, a driver to Nationalist MP and former Sliema mayor Robert Arrigo, who until very recently, was Dimech’s political mentor.

“The Labour councillor’s declaration of gratitude for Dimech and its abstention on the motion, means the party is still carrying on its campaign to support the former mayor.

“Despite Nikki Dimech’s admission to police, Joseph Muscat’s Labour is weak on corruption because it defends whoever admits to involvement in corruption, and instead criticizes the PN for expelling Dimech,” the PN said.

The PN said it was “cynical” of Labour’s three councillors, not to have voted in favour of the motion to oust Dimech and install Joanna Gonzi as mayor.

Instead it accused Labour of “defending those accused with corruption and continuing in its tradition to be weak on corruption.”

Before the start of yesterday’s meeting, Labour councillors Martin Debono, Nikolai Cuschieri - who is actually in the employ of Nikki Debono’s audit firm - and Marianne Aquilina, issued a statement explaining they would abstain on the vote:

“This case is politically contaminated, and it’s a fight for power with roots in the corridors of the PN headquarters, between rival candidates and their friends. We don’t agree with the uncivil way Sandra Camilleri was treated, an elderly person who always acted in an exemplary way.

“We don’t agree that Joanna Gonzi be made mayor, as in various occasions she showed disrespect towards the Labour minority. We don’t feel it right that a few hours before this vote, the police filed charges against the mayor, with the probability that the council decision has been influenced.”

avatar
I really feel sorry for you cos you have been found guilty by the PN when a hearing in court has not even started. At this point I ask all: Why should I believe the allegations of the said contractor, why should I believe the police corps, why should I believe Paul Borg Olivier and not Nikki? Has the police corps started an independent investigation on the allegation made by Nikki? Or is everybody a saint except for Nikki? When it comes to purifications I definitely cannot look at the PN Will someone please enlighten me who has won anything in this saga? As regards to Labour abstaining from the vote, I agree more than 100%, let the PN swim in its own mud.
avatar
Tony Zerafa
Labour played their cards right. Firstly, one cannot, at this point, convict the former mayor since he is still innocent until proven guilty, and therefore abstaining from the motion was the most adequate thing to do. Secondly, the Labour Party is right to not interfere with PN internal politics. If the PN want to fight it out between themselves, let them do so.
avatar
Mario Pisani
PL made the right political and mathematical calculations in asbtaining. Politically, because they decided to stay away from a case which is clearly motivated by internal politics within the 10th district and, mathematically, there position didn't tilt the final outcome one way or another and they left the whole matter in the hands of the PN and former PN councillors. What's shameful is how PN insists on deliberately damaging someone who, afterall, contested in their party's name up to less than a year ago.
avatar
charlene cassar
I don't have any particular sympathies or affiliations with either PN or PL but in my opinion, PL would have gotten criticised all the same had they voted either in favour or against so an abstention is the safest way not to commit to something. In this case, many question marks were raised about the process which was used against Mr Dimech, especially the allegations which were raised by him about his treatment at the depot. It would have been wiser for the PN to wait until the issue would have been clarified further before barging in.
avatar
Miriam Rizzo
No matter what the PN says, PL acted right and very clever. Gone are the days when PN looks down on PL for political wisdom.
avatar
Romina Debrincat
PN can NEVER spin its way out of this one! This statement only makes matters worse. They may have got what they wanted yesterday...but this short term strategy will soon come back to haunt them!