Why Muscat won’t repeat Sant’s mistake on public appointments

Joseph Muscat today will give a glimpse into what Labour will do if elected to government on its promises to fight corruption and reduce taxes

A recorded interview with senior MaltaToday journalist James Debono will be aired today on Super One radio, where Muscat is questioned on how his party is being perceived in its claims that it will fight corruption.

Muscat blames Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi for creating a sense of cynicism amongst the general public, for the way it views political parties as bringing nothing new to the way they govern the country.

Debono asks Muscat on his take of the cynical view of people that a change in government will be nothing but a game of musical chairs.

“It is cynicism that stems from this government’s mediocre style of governance, and it is a strategy: a strategy that both parties ‘are the same’.”

Muscat claims he will usher in drastic changes if elected prime minister, referring specifically to the €200 million contract for the Delimara power station extension to Danish firm BWSC and Vassallo Builders Group, which is now under investigation by the European Commission on suspicions of irregularities.

“If I was prime minister and had these facts presented to me, I would not defend the contract. Gonzi simply defends the status quo. I would get to the very bottom of the case. A situation where Gonzi defends this contract is unacceptable.”

Muscat does not commit himself to a clear course of action on how, if elected to government, he would reverse the BWSC contract, with works at Delimara already in progress even while Brussels investigates.

“I’m waiting for the Commission’s verdict. But the people will not pay for the mistakes of this prime minister.”

He stresses that nobody will “pay for the people who stole from the taxpayers” when presented with the scenario that a financial penalty from Brussels would still mean that it will be taxpayers who pay for the government’s infringement of EU laws.

“We’re ready to give full protection to whistleblowers who will say which politicians were involved in this case.”

In a reference to Enemalta’s chairperson Alexander Tranter, whose business links included Vassallo Builders Group, the recipient of the energy corporation tender, Muscat is also asked on how he will appoint people to drive the government’s authorities.

“What’s important is that they shoulder their responsibility. I will choose people on the basis of meritocracy, and according to their abilities.”

Even if they are not from the Labour camp?

“I will appoint people who are able to manage and believe in the government’s programme. I can’t have a ship’s captain who steers south when it must go north.”

Muscat also said he would not commit the same mistake made by Alfred Sant, when asked to comment on how the former prime minister kept civil servants who were not necessarily sympathetic to the party in government back in 1996.

“I’m not ready to appoint people just so that I can look nice for the media,” Muscat says.

Queried on how obscure party financing is at the root of many corruption scandals, Muscat is pushed on Labour’s ill-thought out decision to leave the Select Committee for the strengthening of democracy, where a law on party financing could be hammered out.

“It’s a convenient excuse made against us but government needs no opposition to present a law on party financing. People today already pay for the PN’s financing from their own pockets. And it’s because of the PN’s so called ‘JS list’ of party financers who are given public contracts.”

When Muscat is asked about Labour’s own financers, he claims the party has greater problems than the PN’s in attracting donations. “Let’s take BWSC. Zaren Vassallo is the man who will pocket the money from the Delimara contract. And it’s he who finances the PN. Full stop, fresh line…”

Muscat stops short of declaring whether he will present a private member’s bill on party financing.

He is also taken to task on how Labour councillors abstained from ousting Sliema mayor Nikki Dimech when he was accused of corruption, while the party promises a zero-tolerance on corruption.

“A local council is not a court… the PN has a majority in Sliema and needs no votes from Labour to impeach its mayor.”

But Labour is also supporting the appointment of a Nationalist deputy mayor in the same council.

“Because those nominated for mayor and deputy mayor have shown cooperation with the Labour side,” Muscat says.

The Labour leader also stops short from passing judgement over the way police investigations, as in the case of Nikki Dimech’s bribery charges, are closely liked to government and party intentions.

“We must introduce new mechanisms and discuss the introduction of the inquiring magistrate to investigate cases on its own initiative… what I find laughable is that the Permanent Commission Against Corruption has never uncovered one single case of corruption. I think the police are not paid much for a lot they do and are carrying out a thankless job.”

avatar
EU sceptics websites do not detail the conseqences of withdrawal. Up to 2013 Malta will receive more funds than it contributes even though the amounts might be neglible. After 2013 Malta will be a net contributor and if you think things are getting tough now wait during the next 3 years when new legislation comes into effect for financial services to defend the Euro and global warming to defend climate change. Malta's fees are associated with access to membership markets and once you paid these fees and was given access to those markets, those fees are not refundable. However grants that were used to bring Malta infrastructures and administration management up to EU standards are refundable because otherwise member countries will join till their standards are lifted with EU funds and then simply walk out. Do you really believe the EU would approve legislation that can come back to have dire consequences on its monetary policies? If it was that easy GREECE & IRELAND would have considered that option. Their economies would be in shambles without the EU markets and they would be facing financial collapse as they try to set up their own currency. The seriousness of EU membership was established and rightly so. by how easily they followed EU and world bank directive to make the necessary cuts to bring their budgets under control. If Malta remains on its present course un regards defecits and national debt, the day is not far away from when the government will have to tackle these same problems. May you live long enough to realise your dream however I must look at other alternatives and that is to create a meaningful political party that can control the PN & PL and hold them accountable for their actions.
avatar
minnfommirrih We shall do whatever is necessary to get Malta out of the EU. If the PL doesn't listen then yes, if need be we shall have another political party. As for your assertion that we will have to pay the EU back what they gave us, that is a blatant lie. Apart from what they will have to give us back what we have paid them which is much more than we are getting because that would include all expenses incurred to abide with its regulation, I suggest you go and see this video from the European Parliament website and see how easy it is to get out of the eu and don't be influenced by what the local politicians may tell you. http://www.europarltv.europa.eu/YourParliament.aspx?action=viewVideo&packageid=f5077c6b-3b92-4a1f-8271-c7a49c3bc6e8 You can also find the link on the CNI website www.cnimalta.org You can also choose to see the subtitles in Maltese. As for collusion, everyone is entitled to his and her opinion, but whether the political parties collude or not, we shall get Malta out of the EU come what may.
avatar
There are too ways to tackle this issue. You can either live in this illusion or Start a new political party that can attract politicians with principals to practice MALTA FIRST & FOREMOST. This country will never be able to leave the EU for the following reasons. The PL and its leadership has committed to EU membership and this country will never be able to finance the needed funds that must be refunded to the EU. One important fact in the way the PL in Opposition has adopted itself to milking the cow at tax payers expense makes one think that the political system in Malta has taken the image of monkey see; monkey do. The sad part is that the Opposition efforts are so weak and hopeless; one can conclude that political collusion has taken root. Obviously they fear rocking the boat that took them to Brussels.
avatar
Sift the PL of the EU lackeys and bring back those who remain of the old guard. Declare that once elected they will tear up the Malta-EU accession treaty, combine it with my suggestions re foreigners, settlers and immigrants, and they are assured a majority that has never been seen before in Malta by any political party. We can rebuild Malta when we are no longer dictated to by the EU and can do whatever is necessary in our own interests.
avatar
The fact of the matter is this. The Maltese people had been betrayed by those who insisted on EU membership. We all know who the YES moviment were. Most of them are enjoying the fruits of their labours in Brussels. Some of them OLD LABOUR have harvested their seeds of anti-Sant and Pro-EU by living in palaces or receiving republican medals of recognition. To believe that after voting for EU membership, any whining will take Malta back to the past is only an illusion. After the EU membership and then the EUROZONE adoption, Malta was literally thrown to four winds of unbidled greed, unchecked security, free markets and free movement of refugees and illegals where planning was left to organised crime. Malta's assets had all been sold and Malta's debt will soon resemble that of other EU states that are taking parliamentary action for survival. These actions will have disastrous effects on the working class and those living below the social safety net. To believe the NSO about Malta's economic situation and tourism figures, one must ask one very simple question. If our country is doing so well economically, how is it that every year Malta must finance on average an additionally 400 million Euros in increased DEBT. Is anybody accountable on this blessed island? Twenty years of a PN administration has rewarded its inner circle with unlimited financial gains and a national debt load that must be shared by all tax payers. Twenty years of PL oppositon has resulted in inner squabbles and direct interference to loose national elections. The proof is in the puddings between the EU and Malta's parlamentary elections. The PL elected Four out of Six seats in the EU. They also elected 34 out of 65 seats which in a true Democracy is considered a right to govern, The total majority votes should not even be an issue. The constitution calls for 65 seats in parliament, so why should the tax payers continue with the burden of financing another 4 seats just because the OLD nitwits saw fit to protect the two main political parties and ensure that a third party is out of the question. This is what exposes how utterly useless and hopeless the opposition has continued to be. Is this the Democracy of old that Maltese wish to bring back? There has never been a more opportune time for everyone to invest in a third party. The days of electing your district MP through loyalty party politics is over. Anybody who is interested in the future of Malta and its future generation must take a long look at both the PN & the PL and truely declare what we have is unacceptable. On both sides the infighting at Pieta & Mile End is comical and an embarrassment to the Maltese nation.
avatar
Everyone has a right to his opinion, but what's wrong in having the old order back into the party? What's wrong with having decent wages, pensions, working conditions, no illegal immigrants in Malta and stopping and reversing legal immigration since we do not have even enough space for ourselves, defending our industries against foreign ones, remaining neutral and not playing hubby to the USA and NATO with their illegal interventions and interference in other countries and their internal affairs? I also expect any decent Maltese political party to declare in its political electoral programme that it will declare that we no longer form part of the European Union once in power because we have again become slaves in a colonized country, in our own country, dictated to by the European Union unelected dictators, repeal all rights given to European Union citizens and prevent any foreigners except those married to Maltese citizens from remaining and working in Malta. This is what I expect of all decent Maltese political parties to be worthy of our votes. If not they will be unworthy of even considering to go to vote let alone vote for them. As for illegal immigrants and also legal immigrants, those who defend them ought to know that all over Europe people are fed up with them and the latest news is that preliminary results in Finland have shown that an anti-immigrant party has won parliamentary seats for the first time in Finland. This will also happen in Malta if the political parties continue allowing legal and also illegal immigrants to come and stay in Malta. Maltese political parties are there to defend and secure Maltese citizens rights and protection in Malta not those of foreigners and illegal immigrants. Political parties, you have been warned. Disregard at your own risk.
avatar
Another interview without any credible substance. It's the POT calling the KETTLE black. The party leader that was instrumental in leading a coup to loose the last election so that Alfred Sant could be replaced is now lecturing about corruption and drastic changes of progressive politics and moderation. If you believe that than I have absolutely no sympathy for Malta's fragmented political system. This is nothing but cheap talk about politics of betrayal while the old order clawed their way back inside the PL. Reminds you of the snake that sheds its skin. Is it possible for Malta to choose its' politicians with principals and some wit. At present you have an administration whose main ambitions are to get rich on the back of the tax payers and a hopeless and useless opposition. To understand how irrelevant Muscat leadership has been, all one has to do is look at his media department that continues to sputter and fumble on important issues. Is change possible?