'Full control over corruption not possible' - Austin Gatt
Former investments minister Austin Gatt testifies again in the Public Accounts Committee on the NAO report into Enemalta's fuel procuremment
No government can keep corruption fully at bay, no matter how many controls it imposes to quell it, former resources minister Austin Gatt claimed.
“The nature of corruption isn’t about shortcomings in papers and writing, but about discretion,” Gatt, the minister formerly responsible for Enemalta, told a Public Accounts Committee session investigating Enemalta’s past fuel procurement. “I fully agree that the fuel procurement committee should have formally kept its minutes, and I’d have given a ministerial directive for them to have done so had I known that they weren’t written properly. However, the fact that they didn’t formally keep minutes isn’t in itself a sign of corruption. Minutes are formally written at the Lands Department, but can anybody truly ensure that it is free of corruption?”
When pressed by Justice Minister Owen Bonnici, Gatt said that many people believe that there was something corrupt about the Gaffarena expropriation and Café Premier cases. Bonnici retorted that “rampant corruption” took place under Gatt’s watch – which included the charging of people in court in relation to the oil procurement scandal, and the granting of a presidential pardon to oil trader George Farrugia.
“Every country has its own system to prevent corruption, and yet cases keep popping up,” Gatt said. “No minister is a superman, capable of removing it entirely. The real shame is that politicians keep blaming the opposite party, rather than putting their heads together to tackle the true roots of corruption.”
Throughout his grilling, Gatt repeatedly insisted that he would have gone straight to the Police Commissioner had he been made aware of any wrongdoing regarding oil procurement at Enemalta, just as he had done when he had suspected foul play over a €26 million IT contract for Mater Dei.
However, towards the end of the session, Labour MP Deborah Schembri questioned how Gatt could possibly have been unaware of all the wrongdoing that was occurring under his watch. She quizzed him on what responsibility he, as the minister responsible at the time, should have shouldered.
Gatt responded that the law is quite clear in where responsibility starts and ends, and “god forbid that a minister doesn’t abide by the law”. Pressing harder, Schembri said that Gatt was responsible for improving Enemalta’s internal structures to prevent corruption, “something that goes beyond the letter of the law”. Gatt agreed that Enemalta’s structures should have been improved, but that a proposal to do just that had been turned down by the finance ministry due to funding problems.
When questioned, he described former Enemalta chairman Tancred Tabone as an “experienced chairman who knew how to handle a board, if perhaps a little too hands-on”. On Frank Sammut, who has also been arraigned in court in relation with the oil scandal, Gatt responded that he had been employed as a consultant on issues relating to the storage of data at Enemalta.
“Anybody who committed wrongdoing and betrayed my trust should be punished severely by the law,” Gatt said, while denying that he had cast a blind eye on corrupt practices.