GRTU on war path as government calls for more dialogue

GRTU members have 'authorised' the union’s council to 'mobilise all sectors' and protest against the way government has breached 1992 agreements in liberalising the gas issue.

During the union’s general meeting on Sunday morning, GRTU condemned the government’s behaviour throughout the issue as “condemnable and damaging.” The union was referring to the way existing and enforced agreements reached in 1992 mean that gas distribution licences were bound to particular territories.

Breaching these territories meant that licence holders (distributors) would be breaching the conditions of their licences.

However Easygas, the new kid on the gas distribution block, was allowed a licence that is not tied to a particular zone or territory, meaning that it is in breach of the existing exclusivity guaranteed by the licensing system, the distributors are claiming.

The issue caused considerable unrest over the end of year period, as industrial action almost took place just days before Christmas Day, one of the busiest times of the year for catering and entertainment establishments.

Reacting to the GRTU’s calls for mobilisation, the government said that it is committed towards a strong regulatory system which guaranteed fair competition to the benefit of consumers, operators, distributors and the government.

The government reiterated that the best solutions are found through dialogue, adding that this is why it had been involved in a number of meetings with all the parties concerned over the past weeks.

The government also appealed to all parties concerned not to close doors on dialogue and discussion.

At their annual general meeting this morning, GRTU members encouraged and authorised the council to start mobilising all its sectors to protest together against the government behaviour with gas distributors.

The meeting condemned the government for breaching an agreement reached in 1992 with the GRTU in the gas liberalisation issue and said the way the government behaved in the case was condemnable and damaging.

avatar
I find it inconceivable that Farrugia want to protect monopolies. A distributor has just a few thousand euros worth of a truck and they expect that they are owed a living? Or a couple of hundred thousand euros to let up their monopolies? What about all the businesses that have hundreds of thousands worth of machinery to manufacture and they are constantly being bombarded with imports and sales dwindling? Mr. Farrugia you and your PN masters told us that E U membership is all about choice etc etc. Let there be choice then and no more insanity of dishing out money from public taxes. Stop playing the hero Farrugia and live up to your masters voice.
avatar
Isabelle Borg
Li tzra tahsad Sur Farrugia. Issa ghalaq halqek u taghmel figura ahjar.
avatar
Jiena nghid kelma lil membri kollha tal GRTU kif ghadkom THALLU lil Vince Farrugia presitend tal ghaqda taghkom meta Xeba jghamlilkhom QASSATAT impossibli ma ghandkomx HILA TAHTRU lil xi HADDIEHOR floku ghax kif jista Vince Farrugia JINNEGOZJA F ISIMKOM meta HU bicca wahda ma GONZI