Tonio Borg told NATO member states to ‘knock on other doors’

Foreign Minister Tonio Borg, 'no military action involving Malta' - but US ambassador to NATO confirms Malta’s role as international base for ‘larger co-ordinating process’ - UK denies Malta involvement in botched SAS mission, but photographic evidence of British jets at Luqa airport remain unexplained.

Malta’s foreign minister Tonio Borg has issued a stark warning to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) stressing that if they intend to engage in any military action against Libya using Malta as a base, they should “go and knock on other people’s doors.”

Ironically, this comes in the wake of reports that NATO aircraft have been in close communication with Maltese authorities, and the day after the US ambassador to NATO confirmed Malta’s role as base for ‘the larger international co-ordinating process’ for operations which also involve NATO,

Speaking to MaltaToday from Rome after meetings with his Italian counterpart Franco Frattini, Malta’s foreign minister said that he made it clear to all NATO member states, that Malta will not allow its neutrality to be breached and its Constitution broken.

“Malta’s role in the developing crisis in Libya is purely humanitarian and nothing more, however we will never accept any circumstance where Maltese territory be used for any military action against Libya,” Borg said.

But he also stressed that Malta cannot be neutral before the humanitarian tragedy that is unfolding at the Libyan borders with Tunisia and Egypt, where thousands of people are fleeing the violence are stranded in no man’s land, and living under extreme hardship.

“Where there is a situation of life and death, I choose life,” Minister Borg said, adding that “neutrality doesn’t come into this choice... I won’t be neutral on such a tragedy.”

Military interests overhead

Asked about a proposed no-fly zone over Libya by the United Kingdom and the United States, Tonio Borg preferred to adopt a wait-and-see attitude, insisting however that any decision should lay within the parameters of a United Nations mandate, “which is turning out to be quite unlikely, given that Russia has already expressed objections.”

When questioned about last weekend’s botched mission in Benghazi by UK special forces, that was reportedly planned and deployed from Malta, the Foreign Minister stressed that the Maltese Armed Forces have received “assurances” from the UK’s joint-command centre currently operating from Malta as part of the evacuation programme, that “Malta was not involved in the operation.”

However, these assurances remain to be verified in the wake of evidence that senior governmental and military officials were in Malta over the weekend, when the Benghazi operation was playing out.

MaltaToday has photographic evidence of a RAF executive jet HS-125 that was secretly parked behind a hangar at the airport.

The aircraft regularly provides a passenger service to the Royal Family, Government ministers and senior military officers and is operated throughout the world in the VIP role and, in its communications role. The jet left Malta on Monday soon after the Special Forces and MI6 team returned from Benghazi aboard the HMS Cumberland that docked at the Grand Harbour.

In the meantime NATO has deployed the sophisticated Awacs aircraft above Malta, Lampedusa and Pantelleria on a 24/7 non-stop routine. The Awacs belong to NATO, France and the United Kingdom. Other military planes have included Portuguese F-16’s, a USAF air tanker, and a USAF flying fortress MC-130H. Last night, a Canadian executive jet CC-144B landed in Malta, while C-17 and C-130 Canadian AF aircraft are still at MIA.

US ambassador to Nato briefing

Tonio Borg’s comments were made in the light of remarks made by the United States ambassador to Nato Ivo Daalder during a press briefing.

The senior US diplomat confirmed Malta’s centre-stage role in international operations involving, among others, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO).

In an on-the-record press briefing last Monday, Ambassador Daalder unambiguously confirmed Malta’s role as a base for ‘the larger international co-ordinating process’ of ongoing relief efforts in Libya.

“The larger coordinating process remains an international one based in Malta at the moment in which NATO will be one of many other players,” Daalder said in response to a question regarding NATO’s operational partners in the Mediterranean.

He also made it clear that NATO’s involvement has to date been limited to humanitarian aims.

“On the question of who NATO is dealing with, right now NATO is dealing with international organizations. We are offering support to those organizations as they engage in the activities to provide humanitarian relief.  So we’re – the secretary general is in contact with the NATO – with the UN secretary general. He’s in contact with the AU, with the Arab League, with UNHCR, the IOM, OCHA -- all of the agencies that are really involved on an international side providing humanitarian relief. And our effort here is to suggest – we have some capabilities that may be very useful to meet the needs, the dire needs that you face right now.”

Daaldo said that there was no intent to have a presence inside Libya at this point.

“If and when ships with aid may have to go to Benghazi, that’s already happening as we speak. I think the Italians are in Benghazi today in order to deliver aid. And that will be done by nations, but it will be coordinated by the NATO effort. The command-and-control aspect is only for the NATO effort.”

With regard to surveillance capability – which goes beyond humanitarian aid – he clarified that: “when you have air transportation capability that is owned and operated by NATO or tasked by countries to NATO authorities, that’s the command-and-control that will fall within NATO.”

It was at this point in the briefing that Daaldo referred to Malta’s explicit role as a hub for the wider international efforts, which also includes NATO.

avatar
If this is so why are NATO member counties aircraft being allowed to land and stay in Malta? http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=28367 Why are they not told to go away and don't come back? Why are they also using warships for evacuations? Why didn't they use commercial ships? Why are foreign soldiers being allowed in Malta? Why? The Constitution provides in Article 1 that: (3) Malta is a neutral state actively pursuing peace, security and social progress among all nations by adhering to a policy of non-alignment and refusing to participate in any military alliance. So why is Malta in the PfP which is a NATO Organization? Such a status will, in particular, imply that: (a) no foreign military base will be permitted on Maltese territory; Then why are so many military aircraft and ships being allowed to land and stay and operate from Malta in this troubled time? (b) no military facilities in Malta will be allowed to be used by any foreign forces except at the request of the Government of Malta, and only in the following cases: (i) in the exercise of the inherent right of self-defence in the event of any armed violation of the area over which the Republic of Malta has sovereignty, or in pursuance of measures or actions decided by the Security Council of the United Nations; or Was there an armed violation over the area of the Republic of Malta that we had to exercise self-defence? NO, so why are the foreign military aircrafts, ships and soldiers being allowed to be in Malta? (ii) whenever there exists a threat to the sovereignty, independence, neutrality, unity or territorial integrity of the Republic of Malta; Was there any such threat? No. So again, why allow foreign military aircraft, ships and personnel in Malta? What is happening behind our backs? Why aren't they ordered to LEAVE? (c) except as aforesaid, no other facilities in Malta will be allowed to be used in such manner or extent as will amount to the presence in Malta of a concentration of foreign forces; Considering the number of military aircraft, ships and soldiers, they certainly amount to a concentration of foreign forces in Malta. Why are they being allowed to be here? (d) except as aforesaid, no foreign military personnel will be allowed on Maltese territory, other than military personnel performing, or assisting in the performance of, civil works or activities, and other than a reasonable number of military technical personnel assisting in the defence of the Republic of Malta; Again, the same questions as in the previous paragraph. We are also under NO attack and don't need foreign military personnel in Malta. So why are they being allowed to be and to remain here Dr Gonzi and Dr Borg? You don't need military hardware and personnel to conduct CIVILIAN rescue operations. SO WHY ARE THEY BEING ALLOWED TO BE AND REMAIN IN MALTA? WHY DON'T YOU ORDER THEM TO LEAVE FORTHWITH? IF THE FOREIGN LEADERS CAN FOOL YOU BOTH THEY CANNOT FOOL US AND THEY SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CONSTANT BREACH OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
avatar
Nice words Dr.Borg. Any assurances that on the ships that entered in Malta in these last two weeks they did not have on board any nuclear weapons. I do not believe that the U.S have any particular interest in the matter, they have more than enough on their plates. I strongly believe that there are other interest in the matter. Action please
avatar
This is our first real test in neutrality. All eyes on Minister Borg, and of course, Castille. If we fail this time, our entire Constitution will be jeopardized. We'll be facing a chaotic scenario and "extra-parliamentarianism" revisited. Fil-Parlament jikbru fjuri?
avatar
Wish I could take the Minister's word for granted. But the toing and froing of the British jets at our airport and the bee of activity with foreign war ships entering and leaving our ports is not much of comfort for my peace of mind! And then remembering how Malta handled the situation when Frontex was supposed to help us and instead we finished with illegal migrants landing on our shores because Frontex brought them here, continues to add further doubts in my mind that we are really capable of telling NATO to knock on other doors.
avatar
THe Italians in this Libyan Saga till now had a low profile. Therefore if NATO wants to use military action against Libya, then they have Sigonella airbase in Sicily. NATO can easily leave us alone and out of the action. Malta is a nation for peace not like the US and Britain always plotting for warmongering - as soon as the Libyan conflict started, the US deployed and mobilized its military towards Libya. These Americans, always keen to be part of the action especially military and always picking a fight were there is one. Well, their economy goes around armaments and weapons of mass destruction and lobbying to Capitol Hill is ever intense. Amen.
avatar
Italy to offer military bases for UN, NATO-led "no-fly zone" over Libya ROME, March 8 (Xinhua) -- Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said Italy was ready to offer the use of its military bases and logistic support to a United Nations and NATO-sponsored "no fly zone"over Libya. Despite ruling out the possibility that Italy might participate in the sky patrolling, Frattini, however, stressed the importance of "our Euro-Atlantic loyalty" that would make available to the international community several military bases for flight operations towards Libya. The only condition to Italy's role in offering logistic support, said Frattini, would be the "existence of international legitimacy to the 'no fly zone' enforcement through a UN Security Council resolution and support from the NATO. "A 'no fly zone' implies that there are airplanes flying over Libya hindering other planes from departing, and if these do take- off it would imply some shooting,"he stressed. "We need to remain calm and consider the situation,"he added. "The Libyan civil war cannot be stopped tomorrow unless by means of war. And a war is not a video-game,"he said. Therefore, the minister made it clear that the only way Italy could contribute to a possible "no fly zone" over Libya would be by offering to international-led operations its bases and logistics.